Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



November 23, 2010

The Failure of the Word "Tolerance" in Modern Society


November 23, 2010
Interfax

The Head of the Center for Geography of Religions at the Synodal Department for Church and Society Relations, Roman Silantyev, urged the public to give up the term tolerance.

"Tolerance is the term which society has been recently trying to fill with a new sense of meaning; but the word failed to comply with expectations in the sense of tolerance to evil and destructive pacifism," he said in Cheboksary at a round table conference Tolerance as Imperative in Dialogue of Civilizations, Cultures and Confessions.

Silantyev said he visited a youth camp this September where a lecture on tolerance was delivered, and participants "trained to use the Internet" told him that they had looked up the word tolerance and found out that it was a medical term meaning a diminution in the physiological response to decease.

Thus, "the most tolerant of us is an AIDS patient who has no immunity to anything at all."

"Tolerance has a Western origin and is a great step forward compared with racial theories, concentration camps and apartheid, but compared with peace among peoples inherent to Russia it is a step backward," Silantyev believes.

According to him, "Europeans have no reason to teach us tolerance, moreover, we should teach them the right patterns of peace among peoples and religions."

"The propaganda of tolerance seems irrelevant while the Western tolerant and multicultural society is in collapse, and even the European leaders refer to the failure of this model," he noted and urged the public to give up this term "as there is no practical benefit in its use."

BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER