Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



June 30, 2016

The Iconography of the Deaths of Apostles


1. The Apostle Peter was crucified upside down in Rome, Italy.



2. The Apostle Paul was beheaded in Rome, Italy.



3. The Apostle Andrew was crucified on an X-shaped cross upside down in Patras, Greece.






4. The Apostle John, after many trials and tribulations, reposed in peace in deep old age in Ephesus.



5. The Apostle James, the Son of Zebedee, was beheaded in Jerusalem.



6. The Apostle Philip was crucified upside down on the wall of a pagan temple in Hierapolis.


7. The Apostle Bartholomew was crucified, skinned alive and beheaded in Armenia.



8. The Apostle Thomas was stabbed with five spears in India.



9. The Apostle Matthew was burned alive in Ethiopia.


10. The Apostle James, Son of Alphaeus, was crucified in Egypt, though he is depicted as being beaten with rods or whips.



11. The Apostle Jude (Thaddeus) was either crucified and shot with arrows in the area of Ararat, or martyred with the Apostle Simon in Beirut with an axe. The obscurity of his end makes the depiction of his martyrdom obscure.

12. The Apostle Simon the Zealot was either crucified in Britain, or crucified with the Apostle Jude in Beirut. The obscurity of his end makes the depiction of his martyrdom obscure.

13. The Apostle Matthias was stoned in Palestine.


14. The Apostle James, Brother of the Lord, was clubbed to death after being thrown off the pinnacle of the Temple in Jerusalem.





By Elder Epiphanios Theodoropoulos

It is one thing to die for ideas, and another to die for events. The Apostles didn’t die for any ideas. Not even for the “love one another”, or any of the other moral teachings of Christianity. The Apostles died for their testimony of supernatural events. And when we say ‘event’, we mean that which is captured by our physical senses, and is comprehended through them.

The Apostles suffered martyrdom for “that which they heard”, “that which they saw with their own eyes”, “that which they observed and their hands touched” (1 John 1).

Just like the clever speculation by Pascal, we say that one of the three following things happened to the Apostles: either they were deceived, or, they deceived us, or, they told us the truth.

Let’s take the first case. It is not possible for the Apostles to have been deceived, because everything that they reported, was not reported to them by others. They themselves were eye and ear witnesses of all those things. Besides, none of them were imaginative characters, nor did they have any psychological inclination that made them accept the event of the Resurrection. Quite the contrary - they were terribly distrustful. The Gospels are extremely revealing in their narrations of their spiritual dispositions: they even disbelieved the reassurances that some people had actually seen Him resurrected.

And one other thing. What were the Apostles, before Christ called them? Were they perhaps ambitious politicians or visionaries of philosophical and social systems, who were longing to conquer mankind and thus satisfy their fantasies? Not at all. They were illiterate fishermen. The only thing that interested them was to catch a few fish to feed their families. That is why, even after the Lord’s Crucifixion, and despite everything that they had heard and seen, they returned to their fishing boats and their nets. In other words, there was not a single trace of disposition in these men for the things that were to follow. It was only after the day of Pentecost, “when they received strength from on high”, that they became the teachers of the universe.

The second case: Did they deceive us? Did they lie to us? But then, why would they deceive us? What would they gain by lying? Was it money? Was it status? Was it glory? For someone to tell a lie, he must be expecting some sort of gain. The Apostles though, by preaching Christ - and in fact Christ crucified and resurrected – the only things that they secured for themselves were: hardships, labors, lashings, stonings, shipwrecks, hunger, thirst, nakedness, attacks from robbers, beatings, incarcerations and finally, death. And all this, for a lie? It would be undoubtedly foolish for anyone to even consider it.

Consequently, the Apostles were neither deceived, nor did they deceive us. This leaves us with the third choice: that they told us the truth.

I should also stress something else here: The Evangelists are the only ones who recorded true historical events. They describe the events, and only the events. They do not resort to any personal judgments. They praise no one, and they criticize no one. They make no attempt to exaggerate an event, nor eliminate or underestimate another. They let the events speak for themselves.

BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER