Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



June 24, 2016

St. Savvas of Kalymnos on the Calendar Schism


By Maria Bizanis
(a close spiritual child of St. Savvas)

Regarding the Calendar he [St. Savvas] told me one day: 

"Maria, I am very much in sorrow that the people here are divided. We must listen to the Church. We should go with the New Calendar. Moreover, it is not important, as it does not involve dogmatic issues, but 13 days. Let us be obedient. Division is the worst of all. Yes, division. The abbess behind us is with the Old Calendar (he meant the Monastery of Saint Katherine). Do you want to follow me there, Maria?" 

I said: "Elder, I am a woman of the world, so it's none of my business."

"Well, there will be three of us, the abbess will come." 

I said: "Listen to me Elder. Do not go there. You will become embittered."

"No," he said, "I will go to speak with her courteously. I will not impose myself on her. I will speak to her so this division does not take place. To come to an agreement. Together." 

I said: "I'm not coming, my Elder. This is the first time I will disobey you." 

"Very well, very well, don't come."

He went with Abbess Thekla [of the Monastery of All Saints]. They went and returned. He was sorrowful, very sorrowful. It seems like he was very upset. He wept. I said: "Elder, did you go?" 

"Yes, yes, I went for a bit. Well, they didn't behave well with me." 

The elder had a point, the abbess had a point: God knows.

From the book Ο Άγιος Σάββας ο νέος ο εν Καλύμνω by Βασιλείου Χρ. Παπανικολάου. Translated by John Sanidopoulos.

BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER