Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



June 6, 2022

Archbishop Stefan of Ochrid on Receiving Autocephaly from the Ecumenical Patriarchate


In his first interview after the removal of the Schism, Archbishop Stefan of Ochrid spoke to the Greek media To Vima (June 5, 2022) and expressed his respect for the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

The interview of Archbishop Stefan was given before the concelebration of Patriarch Porfirije of Serbia with Archbishop Stefan of Ochrid (from the day the Ecumenical Patriarchate decided to restore the former schismatic Church of Skopje) in the Cathedral of Belgrade during which His Beatitude handed over to His Eminence the Tomos of Autocephaly.

From the interview of Archbishop Stefan of Ochrid to the journalist Maria Antoniadou in To Vima we read:

"Will Autocephaly finally be granted to you by the Ecumenical Patriarchate or by the Patriarchate of Serbia?"

"There is order in the Orthodox tradition. We hope to receive autocephaly as all the post-Chalcedonian Churches have received it. We neither ask for, nor want, nor are we entitled to an instant solution, we do not want something that will put the Archdiocese of Ochrid in the middle of the road or at a dead end.

In the pre-synod conferences, as well as in the conversations in Chambesy, the issue of the concession of the autocephaly was raised, that is, for it to be done with some pan-Orthodox consent and to be co-signed by all the leaders of the Churches.

The Ecumenical Patriarch showed great condescension, he also renounced his own privileges, so as to achieve general pleasure and finally peace in Orthodox relations. But what was to be agreed was not agreed and was not accepted and was not implemented as a valid regulation by a pan-Orthodox decision.

The tradition therefore remained in force, for only the Ecumenical Patriarchate to grant a tomos of autocephaly, while the other Churches are to accept this with respect."
 


BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER