Showing posts with label Uniates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Uniates. Show all posts

The Orthodox: Arrival and Dialogue (Fr. John Romanides) - Part 1 of 5


The following little-known and historically important text of Fr. John Romanides was included in a chapter for the book What's Ahead for the Churches? that was published in 1963. Originally it was published in the journal Christian Century that same year as part of a series of papers that were eventually to form the book by distinguished scholars of various faith backgrounds dealing with their representative faith and its future in the part of the world they knew best. At the time, Fr. John Romanides was a professor at Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology in Brookline, Massachusetts, so he decided to write about the current and future challenges of Orthodoxy in America. Fr. Romanides takes his critical and prophetic task seriously and offers a fascinating look at how an Orthodox scholar viewed the current state of Orthodoxy in America and its future from the perspective of 1963. Because it takes up 19 pages in the book, I have divided it here in 5-parts.
 
The Orthodox: Arrival and Dialogue

By John S. Romanides

The appearance of Orthodox churches in the western hemisphere, particularly in the United States and Canada, could prove to be one of the most important factors in the current move toward Christian unity. That may seem a strange credit to impute to the relatively late insertion of 5 million or so Orthodox Christians into a religious and cultural complex made up of some 100 million Protestants and Roman Catholics. But to the Orthodox theologian it is obvious, and it will become more clear as Orthodoxy completes her evolution from the status of immigrant to that of native American church, a process that will render her capable of interpreting herself to her new neighbors.

Holy New Martyrs and Confessors of Nasaud in Romania: Athanasius Todoran, Basil Dumitru, Gregory Manu and Basil Oichi (+ 1763)

 
Holy New Martyrs and Confessors of Nasaud (Feast Day - November 12)

Holy Martyr Athanasius Todoran was born in Bichigiu village of the Sălăuţa valley in the Năsăud region of Transylvania, to a family of devout Orthodox Christians. Few things are known about his childhood; it is only known that he was an outstanding person in his community, an educated person, who had been administrator and tax collector in Bichigiu and Sălăuţa valley.
 
As a virtuous and courageous man, he was a member of a military regiment of the empire from Vienna ever since his youth. Hence, as his retirement was postponed, he left the army of his masters, who were Catholics, and went back home. Followed by the people of the empire, he took refuge in the Ţibleş Mountains, in the land of Maramureş and Chioaru. While in this exile, he always prayed to God for himself and for his fellow people who were suffering all kinds of humiliations.
 

Holy New Martyrs and Confessors of Romania Persecuted by Roman Catholics: Bessarion, Sophronius, Oprea, Moses and John

 
Sts. Bessarion, Sophronius, Oprea, Moses and John of Romania (Feast Day - October 21)

Venerable Bessarion Sarai the Confessor

Saint Bessarion (Sarai) was a Serb who was born in Madian of Bosnia in 1714. At Baptism he was given the name Nicholas. Longing for the monastic life, he went on a pilgrimage to the Holy Land at eighteen, and was tonsured at the Monastery of Saint Savvas in the Holy Land in 1738 with the name Bessarion. 
 
After traveling to Mount Athos on his way home, he entered the Monastery of Pakrou in Slavonia. There he served as a Deacon for seven years, then he was ordained a Priest. After another pilgrimage to the Holy Land he returned again to his homeland to bear witness for his Orthodox Christian faith.

About this time there was a great deal of unrest in the regions of the Banat and Transylvania because many Romanian Orthodox Christians had been forced into union with Rome. At Karlovits around 1742, Patriarch Arsenius had heard of Saint Bessarion’s holy and ascetical life and his reputation as a preacher, and asked to see him. He sent him to defend the Orthodox faith northwest of the Carpathian Mountains and to restore the Orthodox people from Uniatism.

Holy Hieromartyr Macarius of Kanev (+ 1678)

St. Macarius of Kanev (Feast Day - September 7)

The Hieromartyr Macarius (Makarii) of Kanev lived in the seventeenth century. This was a most terrible time for Orthodox Christians in western Rus. The constant struggles of the Hieromartyr were an attempt to defend the Orthodox faith under difficult conditions, when it was possible only to defend the future of the Russian Orthodox Church, which was preserved from the brusque passing of the hurricane of the Unia, endured together with Tatar incursions.

Macarius was born in 1605 in the city of Ovruch in Volhynia into the illustrious Tokarevsky family, renowned adherents of Orthodoxy. In the years between 1614-1620 the Saint studied at the Ovruch Dormition Monastery, and upon the death of his parents he became a monk at this monastery, having begun his service as a novice.

Holy Hieromartyr Hermogenes the Wonderworker, Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia (+ 1612)

St. Hermogenes of Moscow (Feast Day - February 17)

The Hieromartyr Hermogenes, Patriarch of Moscow and all Rus, was born in Kazan around 1530, and was descended from the Don Cossacks. According to the Patriarch’s own testimony, he served as priest in Kazan in a church dedicated to Saint Nicholas, near the Kazan bazaar. Soon he became a monk, and from 1582 was archimandrite of the Savior-Transfiguration Monastery at Kazan. On May 13, 1589 he was consecrated bishop and became the first Metropolitan of Kazan.

Holy Martyr Kosmas the Protos (+ 1280) and the Athonite Holy Martyrs of Karyes With Him

St. Kosmas the Protos (Feast Day - November 18 & December 5)

Verses

The multitude of Venerables with one mind,
Were killed on behalf of the doctrines of the fathers.

These Holy Venerable Martyrs were Athonite Monks from various cells, who resisted Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos and the Latin-minded Patriarch John Bekkos (1275-1282), and they were martyred when Latin-minded Uniates came to Mount Athos. Saint Kosmas the Protos of the Holy Mountain was hanged, while the others were beheaded.

Life of the Holy Hieromartyr Cyril Loukaris (2 of 5)


...continued from part one.

In February of 1612, while in Constantinople to resolve various ecclesiastical issues, he was elected Supervisor of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, but Metropolitan Timothy of Old Patras and other Hierarchs, because they were afraid for some unknown reason of his ascent to the Patriarchal Throne, created a faction against him and caused great confusion in the Church.6 Cyril resigned "to put a stop to the soul-damaging confusion," and departed for Mount Athos and from there to Wallachia, where he remained until the last months of 1615, teaching the people and striving against the Latin propaganda and the Unia.

Life of the Holy Hieromartyr Cyril Loukaris (1 of 5)


By Metropolitan Cyril of Rhodes

The Hieromartyr Patriarch Cyril Loukaris (or Lucaris) was born in Handaka (modern Heraklion) of then Venetian occupied Crete on 13 November 1572 "from notable and free parents, admired in the State and the Church,"1 and at Holy Baptism took the name Constantine. His father was a Priest named Stephen.2 His teacher was the virtuous scholar Hieromonk Meletios Vlastos,3 by whom were taught other illustrious ecclesiastical personalities of the time, such as Saint Meletios Pegas the Patriarch of Alexandria and Meletios Syrigos.

Germanos of Old Patras: The Hierarch of Freedom


We are publishing here a homily of Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos on Germanos of Old Patras (Palaion Patron Germanos), which was delivered in Patras at the "Protokliteion 2006" organized by the Sacred Metropolis of Patras and it was dedicated to the Hierarch of the Revolution.

By His Eminence Metropolitan Hierotheos
of Nafpaktos and Agiou Vlasiou

Today's eucharistic gathering takes place on the occasion of events organized by the Sacred Metropolis of Patras with the inspiration and guidance of the Prelate of this Sacred Metropolis of Patras, Chrysostomos, for the great Hierarch of this Metropolis, Metropolitan Germanos of Old Patras, who brightened this hierarchical throne and loved the Church and people. And through the supplications of your Prelate and my beloved brother in Christ, Chrysostomos, I will refer to this wonderful personality, and we will especially see him through the perspective of the Hierarch of Freedom.

Saint Athanasius of Brest (+ 1648)

St. Athanasius of Brest (or Bretsk) (Feast Day - September 5 and July 20)

Life

The hieromartyr Athanasius was born in the province of Minsk about the year 1597 into a pious Belorussian family named Philippovich. His secular name is not known, as well as the social status of his family. He received a serious upbringing and was educated at a school run by the Orthodox Brotherhood. He came to know well the theological and historical literature, as evidenced in his diary that has been preserved. Later, he graduated from a Jesuit College in Vilnius. He was fluent in four languages, Polish, Latin, Greek, and the local Slavic dialect.

The 1907 Miracle of St. Nicholas in Pennsylvania at Darr Mine


On 20 December 1907 The New York Times front page reported details of a mining disaster in Pennsylvania. Although hundreds of coal miners had lost their lives, the newspaper carried the unusual headline of The Pittsburgh Press: ‘St Nicholas Feast Saves the Russians’. And other headline captions at the time included: Pittsburgh Gazette Times: "Majority of Victims Americans - Foreign Workers Lay Off to Go to Church and Escape Death"; Pittsburgh Dispatch: "Many of the victims are English-speaking men. Foreigners escape owing to religious holiday." What was the story behind these headlines?

On 19 December 1907, at least 239 coal miners were killed in an explosion at the Darr Mine in Van Meter, in the south-western corner of Pennsylvania. This remains the fourth worst coal mining disaster in U.S. history and everyone inside the mine was killed. However, it could have been much worse - the number of victims could have been double. The death toll was not some 500, because 19 December is St Nicholas’ Day [Old Calendar] and some 250 faithful Carpatho-Russian immigrant coal miners had taken an unpaid day off work to celebrate his memory. For even the greedy coal mine owners, who otherwise had virtually complete control over the miners with their threats of dismissal, knew that they could not force Carpatho-Russians to work on 19 December, St Nicholas Day. For St Nicholas is the patron saint of shepherds, one reason why he has been the Carpatho-Russian patron saint for centuries, and thanks to his intercession, men and boys, some perhaps as young as ten, survived to become fathers of hundreds and grandfathers of thousands. Had it not been for this miracle, more than a thousand would have been widowed and orphaned, which in 1907 would have meant financial destitution, for there would have been no assistance from companies or government agencies in those days.

Newspaper reports of the 11:30 am explosion that took place in the middle of the church service record that there was a terrible noise and the ground shook, as if there were an earthquake. Immediately everyone realized that there had been an explosion in the mine and they rushed to help find survivors. Although it was against the few regulations that did exist at the time, the mining company had allegedly interconnected more than one mine, which devastated a large area of the mine on both sides of the river. In the end, many bodies could not be identified and were placed in a mass grave, and although probably higher, the official death toll was 239.

Life was very harsh for the Carpatho-Russian miners. They were worked like animals in the bowels of the earth, exploited by ‘the English’ - anglophone American businessmen and coal barons, and often worked seven days a week. At that time the Carpatho-Russians were supported in their labour struggles by a priest, Fr (now St) Alexis Toth (1854-1909). Fr Alexis not only supported every labour struggle and won the respect of the people, but supported the immigrants in other ways too. For, having been forced into outward Uniatism in their homeland by the threat of starvation in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, from the 1880s on the Carpatho-Russians had been forced into emigrating by the cruel Hungarian Roman Catholic authorities in their homeland. In America they struggled to retain their identity and traditions. However, as a result of the religious freedom they found in North America, many of their priests and tens of thousands of people had since 1892 been returning to Orthodoxy to become part of the Orthodox Church in North America. And it had been St Alexis who had led the way. Indeed, the Roman Catholic Uniats were as a rule anti-labour and supported their Irish masters. The Carpatho-Russian miners remained close to the Church and many later revered the memory of the Russian Tsar-Martyr, Nicholas II, under whom all Orthodox in North America had been united.

In response to the return to Orthodoxy of the exploited and misled Carpatho-Russians, in 1907 the Pope of Rome was so worried that he appointed a Bishop Soter Ortinsky as ‘Greek Catholic’ bishop for America. It is notable that Rome had never made any similar effort to provide for a specific nationality that had emigrated to America. However, Ortinsky was not even Carpatho-Russian, but a Polish Galician, and he had virtually no authority. In reality, relatively few Uniat churches and priests remained under the authority of their local Roman Catholic bishop, who typically had limited knowledge of the Orthodox rite, let alone Orthodox teaching, and refused to recognize married priests. The 1907 miracle in Pennsylvania, which took place according to the Orthodox calendar date of St Nicholas Day, only served to hearten the exploited Carpatho-Russian immigrants who had returned to Orthodoxy, confirming them in their choice of Faith and encouraging others to do likewise in later years.

19 December 2007 was the centenary of the Miracle of St Nicholas at the Darr Mine and at 7 pm an Akathist to St Nicholas was celebrated at the St Nicholas Orthodox Church at Jacobs Creek close by. A new troparion and kontakion were composed for the occasion and new content describing the miracle of the saving of the coal miners were added to the service.

Source


Read more at these links:

‘St Nicholas Feast Saves the Russians’, The New York Times, December 7, 1907

Centennial of the Miracle of St. Nicholas, Jacobs Creek

A Modern Day Miracle: 1907 Jacobs Creek, Pennsylvania

Darr Mine Disaster: The 100th Anniversary of the Miracle of the Intercession of St. Nicholas

Centennial Observance of St. Nicholas Miracle Brings Churches Together - December 19, 2007

December 1907 Was Most Disastrous Month in U.S. Coal History

Darr Mine Disaster: Video


This was the second miracle of St. Nicholas and miners in 1907. Earlier on December 6, Nicholas' feast day in the Gregorian Calendar, the worst mining disaster in United States history took place in Monongah, West Virginia. Nearly 400 men lost their lives that day. However, 60–100 Italian Roman Catholic and Carpatho-Rusyn Greek Catholic miners were spared as they attended a Roman Catholic St. Nicholas feast day observance. American mines were more dangerous than European mines. Practices outlawed in Europe were still allowed in the US where minors were three to four times more likely to die on the job.

Source


Apolytikion in the Fourth Tone
Protected by your prayers, O Holy Father Nicholas we children of those saved offer praise to you. Beneath your holy omofor you covered your people as they labored beneath the hills of a new land. Cease not to intercede that our souls may be saved.

Kontakion in Tone Three
You were truly the protector of your people, O Holy Nicholas for those who zealously celebrated your holy feast. You preserved them from danger and death as they labored beneath the earth. Therefore with one voice we ask you to continually pray for us that we may obtain mercy from Christ our God.

Saint Stephen Milutin of Serbia

Saint Stephen Milutin of Serbia (Feast Day - October 30)

Saint Stephen was the younger son of King Stephen Urosh I, and grandson of First-Crowned King St Stephen (September 24). He ruled Serbia from 1275 to 1320. Stephen Milutin received the throne from his elder brother Dragutin, a true Christian, who after a short reign transferred power over to his brother, and he himself in loving solitude withdrew to Srem, where he secretly lived as an ascetic in a grave, which he dug with his own hands. During his righteous life, St Dragutin toiled much over converting the Bogomil heretics to the true Faith. His death occurred on March 2, 1316.

St Stephen Milutin, after he became king, bravely defended, by both word and by deed, the Orthodox Serbs and other Orthodox peoples from their enemies. St Stephen did not forget to thank the Lord for His beneficence. He built more than forty churches, and also many monasteries and hostels for travelers. The saint particularly concerned himself with the Athonite monasteries.

When the Serbian kingdom fell, the monasteries remained centers of national culture and Orthodoxy for the Serbian nation. St Stephen died on October 29, 1320 and was buried at the Bansk monastery. After two years his incorrupt relics were uncovered.

Source

A Reflection of St. Nikolai Velimirovich

A great son of the Orthodox Church, King Milutin saved the Balkans from Uniatism. At that time in history when the Byzantine emperor's conscience was weakened, this noble and God-bearing Slavic king rose up decisively and, with God's help, saved Orthodoxy-not only in his own land, but also in all the lands of the Balkans. He who closely examines the life of the holy King Milutin will understand why God gave him success after success in all his works throughout his life. When Milutin ascended the throne, he immediately vowed to God that he would build a church for each year that he would reign. He reigned forty-two years and built forty-two churches. Next to some of the churches - for example, in Thessalonica and Constantinople - he also built hospitals for the indigent, where the poor would receive everything free of charge. Beyond that, he especially loved to give alms to the needy from his own enormous wealth. Oftentimes, this powerful and wealthy king dressed in the clothes of a poor man, and seeing the foolish extravagance of the princess and her retinue, said: "What is this, and what is it for? We are not used to such a life." And pointing to a Serbian princess with a distaff in her hand, he said: "Behold, this is the kind of clothing we expect our daughter-in-law to wear."

HYMN OF PRAISE: The Holy King Milutin

By St. Nikolai Velimirovich

The saint of God, Milutin the gallant,
Had a great and difficult task:
To defend the Faith against evil schismatics,
And the people against many cruel tyrants.
He was a scourge to Palaeologus, and a scourge to the Latins-
Milutin triumphed over all the unbelievers.
The Orthodox Faith was his great treasure,
As it was Justinian's crown of pearls!
And, like Justinian, he built many churches,
And raised up glory to the glorious Christ throughout the world.
Royally he attended to matters imperial,
But his mind was not parted from Christ God.
Thus, pure and innocent in heart was he,
A venerable mind in the whirlpool of the world.
God, Who looks at the heart and judges accordingly,
Granted King Milutin immortality-
Immortality of soul, and an incorrupt body.
And lo, our holy king, even now, is intact!
As you fear no man, O wondrous King,
Be our defender before the Living God,
That he forgive our sinful monstrosities,
And vouchsafe us, with you, the Heavenly Kingdom. 

Saint Alexis Toth of Wilkes-Barre

St. Alexis of Wilkes-Barre (Feast Day - May 7)

Our holy Father Alexis, the defender of the Orthodox Faith and zealous worker in the Lord's vineyard, was born in Austro-Hungary on March 18, 1854 into a poor Carpatho-Russian family. Like many others in the Austro-Hungarian empire, the Toths were Eastern Rite Catholics. Alexis' father and brother were priests and his uncle was a bishop in the Uniate church. He received an excellent education and knew several languages (Carpatho-Russian, Hungarian, Russian, German, Latin, and a reading knowledge of Greek). He married Rosalie Mihalich, a priest's daughter, and was ordained on April 18, 1878 to serve as second priest in a Uniate parish. His wife died soon afterwards, followed by their only child - losses which the saint endured with the patience of Job.

In May, 1879, Fr Alexis was appointed secretary to the Bishop of Presov and also Administrator of the Diocesan Administration. He was also entrusted with the directorship of an orphanage. At Presov Seminary, Father Toth taught Church History and Canon Law, which served him well in his later life in America. St Alexis did not serve long as a professor or an administrator, for the Lord had a different future planned for him. In October, 1889 he was appointed to serve as pastor of a Uniate parish in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Like another Abraham, he left his country and his relatives to fulfill the will of God (Gen 12:1).

Upon his arrival in America, Father Alexis presented himself to the local Roman Catholic diocesan authority, Archbishop John Ireland, since there was no Uniate bishop in America at that time. Archbishop Ireland belonged to the party of American Catholics who favored the "Americanization" of all Roman Catholics. His vision for the future was founded on a common faith, customs, and the use of the English language for everything except liturgical celebrations. Naturally, ethnic parishes and non-Latin rite clergy did not fit into this vision. Thus, when Father Toth came to present his credentials, Archbishop Ireland greeted him with open hostility. He refused to recognize him as a legitimate Catholic priest or to grant permission for him to serve in his diocese.

As a historian and professor of Canon Law, Father Toth knew his rights under the terms of the Unia and would not accept Archbishop Ireland's unjust decisions. In October of 1890, there was a meeting of eight of the ten Uniate priests in America at Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania under the chairmanship of Father Toth. By this time the American bishops had written to Rome demanding the recall to Europe of all Uniate priests in America, fearing that Uniate priests and parishes would hinder the assimilation of immigrants into American culture. Uniate bishops in Europe refused to listen to the priests' pleas for help.

Archbishop Ireland sent a letter to his parishes ordering their members not to attend Father Toth's parish nor to accept any priestly ministrations from him. Expecting imminent deportation, Father Toth explained the situation to his parishioners and suggested it might be best for him to leave and return to Europe.

"No," they said. "Let's go to the Russian bishop. Why should we always submit ourselves to foreigners?" It was decided to write to the Russian consul in San Francisco in order to ask for the name and address of the Russian bishop. Ivan Mlinar went to San Francisco to make initial contact with Bishop Vladimir; then in February, 1891 Father Toth and his church warden, Paul Podany, also made the journey. Subsequently, Bishop Vladimir came to Minneapolis and on March 25, 1891 received Father Toth and 361 parishioners into the Orthodox Church of their ancestors. The parishioners regarded this event as a new Triumph of Orthodoxy, crying out with joy: "Glory to God for His great mercy!"

This initiative came from the people themselves, and was not the result of any coercion from outsiders. The Russian Orthodox Church was unaware of the existence of these Slavic Uniate immigrants to America, but responded positively to their petition to be reunited to the Orthodox Church.

The example of St Alexis and his parish in returning to Orthodoxy was an encouragement to hundreds of other Uniates. The ever-memorable one was like a candle upon a candlestick giving light to others (Mt.5:15), and his flock may be likened to the leaven mixed with meal which leavened the whole (Mt.13:33). Through his fearless preaching he uprooted the tares which had sprung up in the wheat of true doctrine, and exposed the false teachings which had led his people astray. Although he did not hesitate to point out errors in the doctrines of other denominations, he was careful to warn his flock against intolerance. His writings and sermons are filled with admonitions to respect other people and to refrain from attacking their faith.

While it is true that he made some strong comments, especially in his private correspondence with the church administration, it must be remembered that this was done while defending the Orthodox Church and the American Mission from unfounded accusations by people who used much harsher language than Father Toth. His opponents may be characterized by intolerance, rude behaviour, unethical methods and threats against him and his parishioners. Yet, when Father Alexis was offended or deceived by other people he forgave them, and he would often ask his bishop to forgive his omissions and mistakes.

In the midst of great hardships, this herald of godly theology and sound doctrine poured forth an inexhaustible stream of Orthodox writings for new converts, and gave practical advice on how to live in an Orthodox manner. For example, his article "How We should Live in America" stresses the importance of education, cleanliness, sobriety, and the presence of children in church on Sundays and Holy Days.


Although the Minneapolis parish was received into the Orthodox Church in March, 1891, it was not until July, 1892 that the Holy Synod of Russia recognized and accepted the parish into the Diocese of Alaska and the Aleutians. This resolution reached America only in October, 1892. During that time there was a climate of religious and ethnic hostility against the new converts. Father Alexis was accused of selling out his own Carpatho-Russian people and his religion to the "Muscovites" for financial gain.

In reality he did not receive any financial support for a long time, for his parish was very poor. Until his priestly salary began to arrive from Russia, the righteous one was obliged to work in a bakery in order to support himself. Even though his funds were meager, he did not neglect to give alms to the poor and needy. He shared his money with other clergy worse off than himself, and contributed to the building of churches and to the education of seminarians in Minneapolis. He was not anxious about his life (Mt.6:25), what he would eat or drink or wear. Trusting in God to take care of him, St Alexis followed the admonition of Our Savior to "seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you" (Mt.6:33). So he bore the tribulation, slander, and physical attacks with patience and spiritual joy, reminding us that "godliness is stronger than all" (Wisdom of Solomon 10:12).

Bishops Vladimir, Nicholas, St Tikhon, and Platon recognized the special gifts of Father Toth, so they often sent him forth to preach and teach wherever there were people of Slavic background. Even though he was aware of his shortcomings and inadequacies, yet he was obedient to the instructions of the bishops. He did not hesitate or make excuses, but went immediately to fulfill his mission. St Alexis visited many Uniate parishes, explaining the differences between Orthodoxy, Protestantism, Roman Catholicism and Uniatism, stressing that the true way to salvation is in Orthodoxy.

Like Josiah, "he behaved himself uprightly in the conversion of his people" (Sir 49:2). He was instrumental in the formation or return of seventeen parishes, planting a vineyard of Christ in America, and increasing its fruitful yield many times over. By 1909, the time of his blessed repose, many thousands of Carpatho-Russian and Galician Uniates had returned to Orthodoxy. This was a major event in the history of the North American Mission, which would continue to shape the future of Orthodoxy in this country for many generations to come. Any future growth or success may truly be regarded as the result of Father Toth's apostolic labors.

Who can tell of the saint's spiritual struggles? Who can speak of the prayers which his pious soul poured forth unto God? He did not make a public display of his piety, but prayed to God in secret with all modesty, with contrition and inward tears. God, Who sees everything done in secret, openly rewarded the saint (Mt.6:6). It is inconceivable that St Alexis could have accomplished his apostolic labors unless God had blessed and strengthened him for such work. Today the Church continues to reap the fruits of his teaching and preaching.

Father Toth's efforts did not go unrecognized in his own lifetime. He received a jeweled miter from the Holy Synod, as well as the Order of St Vladimir and the Order of St Anna from Czar Nicholas II for distinguished service and devotion to God and country. In 1907, he was considered as a candidate for the episcopal office. He declined this honor, however, humbly pointing out that this responsibility should be given to a younger, healthier man.

At the end of 1908, St Alexis' health began to decline due to a complication of illneses. He went to the seashore in southern New Jersey in an attempt to regain his health, but soon returned to Wilkes-Barre, where he was confined to bed for two months. The righteous one reposed on Friday, May 7, 1909 (April 24 on the Old Calendar), the feast of Sts Sava and Alexius the Hermit of the Kiev Caves. St Alexis' love and concern for his spiritual children did not cease with his death. Before closing the account of his life, it would be most appropriate to reveal but one example of his heavenly intercession:

In January, 1993 a certain man prayed to St Alexis to help him obtain information about his son from whom he had been separated for twenty-eight years. Placing his confidence in the saint's boldness before God, he awaited an answer to his prayer. The very next day the man's son telephoned him. It seems the young man was in church when he was suddenly filled with an overwhelming desire to contact his father. He had been taken to another state by his mother, and she changed his name when he was a child. This is why his father was unable to locate him. Having learned from his mother that his father was an Orthodox Christian, he was able with the help of an Orthodox priest to obtain his father's phone number in a distant city. As a result of that telephone call, the young man later visited his father, who rejoiced to see what sort of man his son had become. The father gave thanks to God and to St Alexis for reuniting him with his son.

St Alexis was a true man of God who guided many Carpatho-Russian and Galician immigrants through the dark confusion of religious challenges in the New World and back to the unity of the Orthodox Church through his grace-filled words and by his holy example. In his last will and testament St Alexis commended his soul to God's mercy, asking forgiveness from everyone and forgiving everybody. His holy relics now rest at St Tikhon Monastery in South Canaan, Pennsylvania where the faithful may come to venerate them and to entreat St Alexis' intercessions on their behalf.




Apolytikion in Tone Four
O righteous Father Alexis, our heavenly intercessor and teacher, divine adornment of the Church of Christ! Entreat the Master of All to strengthen the Orthodox Faith in America, to grant peace to the world and to our souls, great mercy!

Kontakion in Tone Five
Let us, the faithful, praise the Priest Alexis, a bright beacon of Orthodoxy in America, a model of patience and humility, a worthy shepherd of the flock of Christ. He called back the sheep who had been led astray and brought them by his preaching to the Heavenly Kingdom!

Primacy, Synodicality and Unity of the Church


Conclusions of the Conference of the Holy Metropolis of Piraeus

Peace and Friendship Stadium, 28 April 2010

"Papal ‘primacy' has no theological foundation, no legitimacy from the Holy Spirit and no ecclesiological legitimacy. It is clearly based on a worldly understanding of authority." This, among other things, was the conclusion of the theological conference which was organized by the Holy Metropolis of Piraeus in the Peace and Friendship Stadium (Melina Mercouri Hall) on 28 April 2010, and which was a success with many clergy and laity present.

The conference was also honored by the presence of His Beatitude Hieronymos, Archbishop of Athens and All Greece, who also started the conference off. Also present were: His Eminence Seraphim, Metropolitan of Kythira; Pavlos, Metropolitan of Glyfada; and Melito, Bishop of Marathon.

The topic "Primacy, Synodicality and Unity of the Church" was expounded upon in two sessions with seven speakers: His Eminence Seraphim, Metropolitan of Piraeus; Hieromonk Luke Grigoriatis; Prof. Aristidis Papadakis (University of Maryland); Protopresbyter George Metallinos; Protopresbyter Theodore Zisis; Protopresbyter Anastasios Gotsopoulos and Prof. Dimitrios Tselengidis.

From the presentations and the discussion that followed, it was concluded: Unity belongs to the nature of the Church as it is the Body of Christ and communion in Him. The true Church is one. The unity of the Church in all its interpretations - structural or charismatic (grace-bearing) - clearly has its foundation in the Holy Spirit. It is extended mystically, but is maintained, fostered and apparent chiefly through Holy Communion.

According to the Confession of Faith of the Synod of Constantinople in 1727: "Therefore no other head whatsoever is accepted in this Eastern Church, save only our Lord Jesus Christ, from the Father given to the whole Church and its foundation." According to Orthodox ecclesiology, "primate" is not meant generally and indefinitely without the presence of the particular synod of a region.

The concept of a rank of honor (that is the term which Orthodox ecclesiastical tradition uses opposed to the subsequent term "primacy" that the papists use) expresses and ensures the unity and the synodicality of the Orthodox Catholic Church. The Pentarchy of the patriarchal thrones is the form which the Church gave to the concept of a rank of honor during the first millennium.

The authority of the "primate," which derives from the rank of honor, is a fruit of synodicality, while the authority the bishop of Rome had already started to appropriate during the first millennium is a result of the abolition of the synodical organization of the Church.

In the Church of the first millennium there was no papal primacy "by divine right" in jurisdiction or authority over the whole Church. On the contrary, the Church had the right to make decisions about its administration without the Pope, even in spite of his strong opposition, and these decisions were universally valid.

After the schism of 1054, the increasing claim of the popes for primacy of authority over the whole Church completely subverted the structure of the mystical body of the Church inspired by the Holy Spirit. It makes synodicality (as a function of this body inspired by the Holy Spirit) relative - practically abolishing it - and introduces the worldly mindset to it. It nullifies the equality of bishops, misappropriates the complete administrative authority of the whole Church, essentially setting aside the Theanthropos (the God-Man) and making a man the visible head of the Church. In this way the ancestral sin is repeated in this institution.

True unity takes place when there is unity in faith, in worship, and administration. This is the model of unity in the ancient Church, which the universal Orthodox Church continues unchanged. Unia introduces a false unity and is based on a heretical ecclesiology, since it allows different forms of the faith and worship, and makes unity contingent on the recognition of the primacy of the pope, which is an institution of human justice, and undermines the synodical structure of the administration of the Church, which is an institution of divine justice. Multiformity is only acceptable in secondary matters of local traditions and customs.

After the First Vatican Council (1870) and especially the Second Vatican Council (1962-1964) papal primacy does not comprise a simple administrative assertion, but an essential dogma of faith absolutely necessary for the salvation of the faithful. Its denial incurs the anathema of the First Vatican Council, whose validity remains still after the Second Vatican Council.

As the host of the conference, Metropolitan Seraphim of Piraeus emphasized in his introduction, "Due to the heretical and blasphemous doctrine of the primacy of the bishop of Rome and the spiritual ramifications which come from it (such as the "infallibility" of the Pope and his autocratic-monarchic despotism over the whole body of the religious community under him), Papism has developed into an autocratic-monarchic system of mystic ideology and perversion of the meaning of the Church. It has proven to be modern Roman-Frank ethnicism (paganismus) in a spiritual disguise, has taken away the mystical freedom in Christ of each of [the Church's] members and has turned out to be the inevitable and fateful cause of the falling away from the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church into hundreds of different heresies, and an insurmountable obstacle to their possible return."

At the assessment of the participants of the current theological dialogue between Orthodox and Roman Catholics, its attempt at the restoration of ecclesiastical communion must somehow - beyond the elimination of the heretical teachings of Rome (Filioque, created grace, infallibility, purgatory, etc.) - aim also at the definite elimination of papal primacy and not at some commonly acceptable interpretation of it.

Finally, the syncretistic framework of "unity in diversity" is considered unacceptable and cannot become acceptable as "a model for the restoration of full communion."

Source

Metropolitan Hierotheos on the Current Dialogue With Rome


Our Church's Participation in the Dialogue With the Catholics

By Metropolitan of Nafpaktos and Saint Vlassios, Hierotheros Vlachos

This statement was an intervention by His Eminence addressed to the Hierarchy of the Church of Greece, which was recorded in the Minutes of the Synod.


The matter of our Church's participation in the dialogue between the Orthodox Church and the "Roman Catholic Church" - but more so the manner in which She is participating - is a huge one; therefore I shall limit myself here, to only briefly presenting a few views on the issue.

1. It is necessary for the dialogue to take place, but it should be with the necessary theological, ecclesiological and canonical prerequisites. In other words, the Church should not, in the name of the dialogue, deny Her theology, Her ecclesiology and Her canonical law.

2. Although there may be issues that are still pending (as is the issue of Unia), as well as other, basic theological issues (as is the teaching of "actus purus" which clearly affects Papism's overall theology - the "filioque" - and ecclesiology) - nevertheless, the matter of associating the primacy with conciliarity can be discussed, given that this was a basic issue that had preoccupied the first millennium.

It is my view, that the gradual severing of Old Rome from the Patriarchates of the East had begun with the issue of the Pope's primacy in the Church, and at a later stage with the Frankish imposition of the "filioque" in the theology of Old Rome. In other words, the Pope could never reconcile himself with the distinction of equal honour that had been rendered to the Bishop of New Rome by the Fourth Ecumenical Council.

3. Even though the dialogue on the association between conciliarity and primacy is important, and it is regarded that they should move on to other issues through this prism, nevertheless, there are certain problems which need to be pointed out.

First: The way that our Church is participating in the dialogue is not appropriate. It is taking place with the utmost secrecy. The texts, which have been endorsed by the meetings so far (Munich, Bari, New Balamon, Ravenna) and by the representatives of our Church, are problematic. There has never been any discussion whatsoever in the Hierarchy as to the stance that our delegates should take in these meetings, and furthermore, those texts have never been discussed in the Hierarchy, even after being endorsed. Therefore, the Conciliar polity in this instance is not being observed. We Hierarchs who are the expressers and the guardians of the Faith have been marginalized - left "in the dark".

Second: The statements made by the Orthodox and the Roman Catholic representatives are evidence of this problematic status, because they are merely proving that there is indeed an endeavour to bring on the "union of Churches" in a not-so-clear manner. These statements are available, should it become necessary to quote them.

Third: During the first millennium, the Orthodox Church had confronted the issue of an honorary recognition of the Pope of Rome. This occurred during the Council at the time of Photius the Great (879-880 A.D.), which, by many Orthodox, is regarded as the Eighth Ecumenical Synod. These two kinds of ecclesiology - that is, of Papism and of the Orthodox Church - had been put forth during this Council. Patriarch Photius had acknowledged a primacy of honour for the Pope, but only within the Orthodox ecclesiological framework: ie, that the Pope has a primacy of honour within the Church, and that he cannot be placed above the Church. Therefore, in the discussion pertaining to the primacy of the Pope, the decision of this Council should be taken seriously into account.

Of course during this Council the matter of the "filioque" was also discussed, along with the matter of the primacy; therefore, when we discuss the matter of primacy today, we should look at it from within the prism of honorary primacy, as we should in the case of the "filioque".

Fourth: Whereas in the Orthodox Church the administrative system is Conciliar, in the "Roman Catholic Church" the administrative system is "Pope-centered". This was made abundantly clear in the decisions of the Vatican II Synod and in other synodal texts, in which it is asserted that the Pope is the "leader of the college of Bishops", the "rock of the Church", the "eternal and visible principle and foundation of unity, who unites the bishops between them, as well as the multitude of the faithful", the "representative of Christ and the Shepherd of the entire Church, who has full, supreme and universal authority in the Church, which he is always free to exercise". One other claim in Papism's ecclesiology that should be underlined is that "there cannot be an Ecumenical Synod, if it is not validated, or at least if not accepted, by the successor of Peter".

Therefore, this Pope-centered perception and the Pope's predominance - even above the Ecumenical Synods themselves - negates synodicity, thus constituting another ecclesiology altogether. The Papist claim therefore, that the Churches (that is, the Orthodox ones) that do not acknowledge the Pope as their head are "deficient" - that is, that they are lacking, cannot be accepted.

Fifth: Despite its many important points indicating how the primacy of the Pope functioned during the first millennium, nevertheless, in the draft of the document that is to be discussed in Cyprus in October, there was no mention of the association between the Pope's primacy and the Ecumenical Councils.

A document that does not possess a clarity of thought cannot prevail, nor help those who have broken away to be reincorporated into the Catholic Church.

Sixth: It is a fact, that the Pope's basic problem is that he has never in essence accepted the 28th Canon of the Fourth Ecumenical Council, which gave equal honor to the Church of New Rome, and the right to ordain Bishops in barbarian lands. This disdain is also proven by the fact that the Pope himself was never present in any Ecumenical Synod - only his representatives.

Seventh: When one studies the documents of the Primates of the Orthodox Churches, one will notice that they may agree on the continuation of the dialogue, however, they also place clear-cut prerequisites, such as -for example- the outright condemnation of Unia, and, through the issue of the primacy, continue with the dialogue on other essential theological issues.

Eighth: The Patriarchate of Moscow had departed from the Meeting in Ravenna - the reason being the presence of the Archbishop of Estonia - and consequently did not endorse that Meeting's document, just as the Patriarchate of Georgia did not endorse it. It is necessary to seek out the decisions of the other Orthodox Churches on the Ravenna Document.

Following all the above, it is my suggestion that directions be given to our representatives, pursuant to a discussion and decision by the Hierarchy, as to what they are to support during the dialogue, and to discuss the issue with the Hierarchy, after the endorsement of the Documents.

At the same time, it should be declared explicitly, that if our representatives endorse a text that is outside the guidelines that will be given to them by the Church, then that text is not to be considered binding by our Church.

Source: Article published in the newspaper "ORTHODOX PRESS" 11/27/2009.

The OCA Is Being Lead Astray: A Brief Response to Metropolitan Jonah


On March 16, 2009 I had the pleasure to attend a timely lecture at Holy Cross Chapel in Brookline, MA given by Archimandrite Elpidophoros Lambriniadis, Chief Secretary of the Holy and Sacred Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople. The lecture was titled Challenges of Orthodoxy in America and the Role of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Little did I know that from this brief lecture there would arise such a reaction of deep seated hostility against the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

I will not summarize the lecture, since it can be read in full at the link provided below, but the controversy lay in the proposal for the submission of the diaspora to the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople as prescribed by the Holy Fathers of the Ecumenical Synods in order to bring unity among all Orthodox abroad. This proposal comes at this time in response to two hierarchs in America, Metropolitan Jonah of the Orthodox Church In America and Metropolitan Phillip of the Antiochian Archdiocese in America, who seek unity in the diaspora not according to the Holy Canons of the Ecumenical Synods which provide the true formula of unity, but according to relative quack principles formulated in their own minds as to how the Orthodox diaspora should govern themselves. In his lecture, Fr. Elpidophoros gave very precise answers to previous statements of these two Metropolitans that were beginning to undermine the authority of the Ecumenical Patriarchate with some surprisingly ignorant misrepresentations and misunderstandings of even the most basic form of Orthodox History and Ecclesiology.

On April 5, 2009 Metropolitan Jonah gave a sermon after a Pan-Orthodox Vespers at St. Seraphim Orthodox Cathedral in Dallas, Texas to respond to the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Immediately video of this sermon leaked onto the internet and it also can be seen in a link below with the transcript. A response to this sermon is hardly necessary for anyone with a knowledge of Orthodox teaching and history since it is so badly articulated to the point where he is on the verge of ecclesiological heresy. But what further struck me was the utter disrespect and immaturity displayed by this newly-enthroned hierarch.

One heresy that I would like to point out was his interpretation of the hierarchical structure in the Orthodox Church. According to Metropolitan Jonah, who seems to be relishing in his uncanonical "autocephalous" status in the OCA (which I may add fails to even unite the Russians in America), since America has bishops in all its jurisdictions there is no need for these bishops to submit to a higher bishop in a far away land. Such a statement can only be a display of willful ignorance of the canons which clearly speak of certain bishops being under the authority of other bishops as "first among equals", just as he himself is a bishop with authority over other bishops as a "first among equals". Let alone the fact that he ignores Canon 28 of the Fourth Ecumenical Synod which clearly unites the diaspora under the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople (as was the tradition throughout the period of the Roman Empire and even during Ottoman times as attested by the granting of autocephaly to the Russians in 1589). The Metropolitans statement is an uncanonical proclamation for autocephaly which only can be granted with the approval of the Ecumenical Patriarchate as well as the other Ancient Patriarchates. His carelessness in such statements is obviously the result of speaking without thinking to rally a revolution against, his oft quoted, the "Old World" hierarchs of the Ecumenical Patriarchate and other Ancient Sees.

The main appeal of the Metropolitan is to Convert sentimentalities. In his lecture he constantly derides the Ecumenical Patriarchate as being "Old World", "foreign", "controlling", "a pope", "nationalist", "imperialist", and "ignorant" among other things. He says that because we are Americans the Phanar "doesn't understand" the concept of freedom that we love as well as our rich diversity, and that we can "determine our own destiny" without their guidance because they do not "appreciate our culture". He accuses the Phanar of not listening to its priests and laity, of being Orthodox Christians because they were born into it as opposed to Americans (his Convert audience) who chose it, of following ideologies of a "forgotten Empire", of not allowing "a word of English" in services and have "never heard English" themselves. The Metropolitan expressed his fears of America being imposed with "foreign customs" and "foreign despots" where "all decisions will be made by a patriarchate still under Islamic domination." And he goes so far as to say: "If we wanted a pope, we'd be under the real one."

Metropolitan Jonah's proposition for America is to be independent of foreign influence and be a "unity in diversity" here in America as we seem fit. He offers no plan on how this can be done of course, and offers no authority or example to follow. Basically he knows what he doesn't want, but doesn't know what he does want hoping that in the end his rebelliousness is endorsed by the Holy Spirit.

In his sermon the Metropolitan also expresses some historical beliefs that are common inaccuracies among the OCA as a whole. For example, that the OCA is the direct inheritor of the first Orthodox mission to the natives in Alaska by such luminaries as Sts. Herman and Innocent of Alaska, as well as the founder of the first established church in the New World in San Francisco, and by such a default they should have sole authority in the New World. Also he says that before the establishment of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese in 1922 all parishes were under the Russian Patriarchate.

The truth is that the great majority of the OCA, then known as the Metropolia, have their origins in the conversions of the Uniates lead by St. Alexy Toth and were only one of three representatives of the Russian community in America of that time (including ROCOR and the Moscow Patriarchate) and have no direct episcopal line to St. Herman (who was not even a bishop or priest). Furthermore, Greeks were the first to establish a presence on American soil in New Smyrna, Florida in 1767, 26 years before St. Herman arrived in Alaska in 1794, which was not American at the time (being part of the Russian Empire). Also the first Orthodox parish established on American soil was by Greeks in New Orleans, Louisiana in 1864, three years before Alaska became American and four years before the first Russian parish was established in American territory (in San Francisco). And many of the Greek parishes before 1922, as well as other jurisdictions, because of their remote locations, often pledged their allegiance to either the Church of Greece or Constantinople or any other Mother See. In fact, the Ecumenical Patriarchate held jurisdiction over the Greek parishes until 1908 when authority was transferred to the Church of Greece for a short time until Patriarch Meletios Metaxakis restored the original status of the Greek churches under the Ecumenical Patriarchate in 1922. For further enlightenment on the non-canonicity of the OCA, which is rejected by all the Ancient Patriarchates today though is graciously allowed to be in communion with them, one can refer to the 1972 book Russian Autocephaly and Orthodoxy in America: An Appraisal with Decisions and Formal Opinions by the Greek Archdiocese.

If one were to honestly compare the talks given by Fr. Elpidophoros and Metropolitan Jonah, it would be surmised why the Ecumenical Patriarchate correctly sees the Orthodox of America as too immature for true autocephaly. The first maturely tackles the issues and gives appropriate proofs from Synodal decrees and has a firm understanding of our situation here in America with an authentic concern to see spiritual growth and prosperity. The other comes off as embarrasingly ignorant, shallow in its spirituality, and vitriolic as summarized in his last words hoping to stir another American Revolution: "Let us affirm to our bishops that they might tell the churches of the Old World, 'There is an American Orthodox Church! Leave it alone!'"

Americans would be wise to sweep their patriotic pride under the rug when it comes to ecclesiastical matters. Pride is the source of the divide among American Orthodox on this issue. Humility is the source of stability and we should all have faith that when the "fullness of time" comes for our autocephaly, the Lord will make sure it happens without our passions getting involved.

Lecture by Archimandrite Elpidophoros Lambriniadis:

http://www.ecclesia.gr/englishnews/default.asp?id=3986

Sermon by Metropolitan Jonah:

Video - http://video.yahoo.com/watch/4812572/12841013

Transcript - http://www.dosoca.org/files/Pan-orthodox-talk-4_7_09.pdf