Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



October 3, 2022

The Deep Foundation of the Church and Arbitrary Traditions

 
By Protopresbyter Thomas Vamvinis

The Deep Foundation of the Church

One of the most misunderstood concepts in our time is the concept of tradition, without putting any definition to it.

It is known that in the Church we do not speak of tradition in general, but we speak of the Holy Tradition, which we distinguish from all other human traditions. Sacred Tradition is not exhausted by, nor is it identified with the church building, iconography or hymnology and the art of chanting. Holy Tradition is something deeper.

All the arts we mentioned are characterized as liturgical, but they are human activities that require special skills that not all people have. Holy Tradition is for all people regardless of physical skills, educational or social level. The liturgical arts are necessary to build a sacred church building, to decorate it appropriately and to perform the services and the Mysteries of the Church in it, in a way to help the believer to pray, to come to himself to receive the Grace of God. These arts have their traditions, which are human traditions.

According to Saint Sophrony the Athonite, his Elder, Saint Silouan, felt the life of the Church as life in the Holy Spirit, and Holy Tradition as the uninterrupted energy of the Holy Spirit within the Church. Holy Tradition, as the eternal and unchanging presence of the Holy Spirit within the Church, is the deepest foundation of its existence. Thus, the learning of the spiritual life, the maturing of man in Christ by the sincere observance of His evangelical commandments, is life in the Holy Spirit, that is, the life within Holy Tradition, which describes the whole life of the Church.

Such an approach to the Holy Tradition is, unfortunately, unknown to many people.

Arbitrary Traditions

Holy Tradition has asceticism as a strong element, which is mastery over the irrational powers of the soul, namely anger and desire. For this reason there is fasting from time to time, a permanent restraint of the passions, the vigilance of reason over the physical senses.

Most popular traditions move in a different direction. They have a primary element of pleasure, dispersion, feasting, dancing, singing, things that mortal man needs in order to make his life somewhat bearable, which, however, do not help him to find and realize the meaning of life.

Popular traditions, when coordinated with the Typikon of the Church, do not separate us from Sacred Tradition. They help us to have a balanced social and ecclesiastical life. However, when with arbitrary choices, thanks to so-called traditional feasts, we eliminate for ourselves the Typikon of the Church, then we find ourselves on a path outside the tradition of our holy Fathers, outside the Holy Tradition of our Church.

It is not possible, for example, on the eve of the Transfiguration of the Savior, during the fast of the fifteenth of August, to organize a "goat festival" and for the organizers and the participants of the festival to think that they respect and celebrate the Despotic and Theotokos feasts of the Church.

Sacred Tradition saves us, not common popular traditions.

Source: Translated by John Sanidopoulos.
 
 

BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER