Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



February 18, 2014

Elder Paisios: "Compassion Harms the Unrepentant"


- Elder, I remember how one time you scolded me a lot.

- If necessary, I will scold you again, that we may go together to Paradise. Now I will take draconian measures!

Look, I have as a rule first to have the other understand that he needs scolding and then after to scold. Do I not do good? Do I, because I scold the other when I see them doing something harmful, become evil?

But what can I do? Should I relax someone in their passion, that I may appear to be supposedly good with him, and then we go together to Hell? My conscience never bothers me when I scold someone or make a remark and he becomes upset, because I do it out of love, for his own good.

I see how he doesn't understand how he hurt Christ with what he did, and this is why I scold him. I feel pain, and melt at the time, but my conscience doesn't bother me that I scolded him. I can go and commune at peace, without having to confess. I feel a certain consolation within me, a certain joy. Because for me consolation and joy is the salvation of the soul.

- Elder, it enters my thoughts that when you are consoling me, it is either because I do not carry the austerity, or because you have told me many times to do something and I didn't do it, and it's as if you allow me.

- Blessed soul, will I play with the salvation of your soul? The young are in training. The old have judgement and keep on track. Feel confident. If I see something crooked, either far away or nearby, I will tell you.

You should have trust and be at peace. Ah, you haven't understood me! Will I easily relax thoughts like this? When I see a soul is sensitive or entirely shocked by the feeling of its error, what can I say? Then I console them, that they may not despair. But when I see the heart is a stone, then I speak strictly to shake it.

If someone goes to a cliff and I say: "Keep going, you are on the right path", do I not do something criminal? The bad thing is that many do not believe, when you tell them not to worry, and they are tormented. If I see something evil, how can I not say it? How can you allow someone to go to Hell? When you have responsibility, then you will also yell, if needed. For me it is better to not say anything, but I can't when I have responsibility.

Then one must be aware of the following: for example, if you do me an evil, I will forgive you. If you then do me another evil, I will again forgive you. I'm fine, but, if you aren't correcting yourself, this is very harmful.

It is one thing if you cannot completely correct yourself. But you should at least try as much as you can to correct yourself. Do not put your thoughts at ease and say: "Since he forgives me, then everything is in good order and I don't need to be burdened, so no need to worry."

Someone can err, but they should repent, weep, ask for forgiveness with contrition, struggle for correction, then there is a recognition of it and the spiritual father must forgive it. But if they do not repent and continue their tactics, then the person responsible for his soul can't laugh. Compassion harms the unrepentant.

Source: From the book Passions and Virtues: Counsels of Elder Paisios the Athonite, vol. 5. Translation by John Sanidopoulos.

BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER