Showing posts with label America. Show all posts
Showing posts with label America. Show all posts

July 4, 2020

Happy Independence Day!


“Why should one refrain from burning hatred, whatever its basis ― race, class, or ideology? Such hatred is in fact corroding many hearts today. Atheist teachers in the West are bringing up a younger generation in a spirit of hatred of their own society.” 

- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
(1983 Templeton Address, "Men Have Forgotten God", in London)

"Against every law of society and nature, our children are taught in school to hate their own country and to believe that the men and women who built it weren't heroes, but villains. The radical view of American history is a web of lies." 

- President Donald Trump
(2020 Fourth of July speech at Mount Rushmore)

Happy Independence Day!



June 24, 2020

Human Beings Are Neither Born Free Nor Equal (St. Athanasios of Paros)


By St. Athanasios of Paros

- The real reason the French were led into impiety is something else. However, because they have shown and continue to show such a fierce obsession with the establishment of secular freedom and equality, the impression is that for this reason alone, by a common decision and choice, they have almost completely eliminated Christ and Christianity and its holy books.

- Freedom, then, is found in two forms. One is the freedom of the soul and the other of the body. Examining the definition of freedom in both of these forms, we find that it is defined as complete autonomy, that is, that no one recognizes any kind of dependence above themselves, nor do they receive orders from another, but that they are the sole master and ruler of themselves and no one else in the world. So if this is defined as an essential feature of freedom, that is, that man is not subject to any principle, I completely reject this general axiom of the most foolish atheists. In other words, I do not accept that people are born free (independent) in the world. On the contrary, I support and will prove that there is no such freedom in the world: people are born and live in the world as "slaves" (dependent) in many ways.

June 13, 2020

Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew at the Tomb of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.


On October 31, 1997 Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew was the first religious leader to visit the tomb of Civil Rights Leader Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in Atlanta, Georgia for a Wreath-Laying Ceremony in his honor at the Martin Luther King Center for Social Change. Present and introducing him was Coretta Scott King.

May 16, 2017

Saint Brendan the Anchorite, also known as the Navigator or Voyager (+ c. 577)

St. Brendan the Voyager (Feast Day - May 16)

“They that go down to the sea in ships, that do business in great waters; these see the works of the Lord, and his wonders in the deep.” - Psalm 107:23, 24

Our holy father among the saints Brendan was born about 484 AD to an Irish family near the present city of Tralee, County Kerry, Ireland. He was baptized at Tubrid, near Ardfert by Saint Erc, and was originally to be called "Mobhí" but signs and portents attending his birth and baptism led to him being called 'Broen-finn' or 'fair-drop'. At a very young age he began his education in the priesthood and studied under Saint Ita at Killeedy. Later he completed his studies under Saint Erc, who ordained him in 512 AD.

November 23, 2016

Thanksgiving Resource Page


"Give thanks in all circumstances, for this is God's will for you in Christ Jesus" (1 Thess. 5:18).

"Whether, then, you eat, or drink, or do anything, do all to the glory of God" (1 Cor. 10:31).

"For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, because it is consecrated by the word of God and prayer" (1 Tim. 4:4-5).

 
 

September 11, 2014

An Orthodox Interpretation of the Results of Terrorist Actions on 9/11


By His Eminence Metropolitan Hierotheos
of Nafpaktos and Agiou Vlasiou

It is known that journalists report on contemporary events, and they analyze them according to their beliefs and their ideological positions. Therefore they offer knowledge, which is then transmitted and creates for many a pseudonymous knowledge of things. Of course, later, after a lapse of many decades and centuries, history corrects things a bit. However, the personal approach to these events, even if it is incorrect, creates many problems.

October 31, 2013

Halloween Resource Page



This page has moved to the following link:


October 24, 2013

September 11, 2013

An Orthodox Interpretation of Terrorist Activities


By His Eminence Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos and Agiou Vlasiou

It is known that journalists are reporting on contemporary events, as well as analyzing them according to their beliefs and ideological positions. Therefore they transmit and create knowledge which is largely a pseudonymous knowledge of things. Of course, later, after a lapse of many decades and centuries, history will restore things a bit. However, the personal approach, and indeed incorrect facts create many problems.

Lately I received a letter from an American woman, a convert to Orthodoxy, who interpreted the events that happened on September 11, 2001 and what followed, through her own Orthodox perspective. Having been born in America and living in that humanistic climate which prevails, she came to know Orthodoxy and become associated with Greece, not for its philosophers, but for its saints and traditions, and through this prism she saw the dramatic events. It is worthwhile to look at the analysis.

I wonder why the disaster in New York caused me such little feeling. The people here are passionate. People have forgotten their lives and are stuck to their televisions. I feel closer to you than to my own country, or to fear or to rage. I do not understand the political aspects, only the fact that Bin Laden is against the western way of life, which he considers a threat to his faith. When I heard about the attack the only thing I felt was the need to pray for the people who could do something like this. I am sure that God will take care of the innocent victims. Moreover, so much good has resulted from the destruction of our country! The hearts of the people have opened, they have emerged from the "cold culture of money", and have found a new perspective on the fragility of our lives. It seems that there is more "heart" in people, greater bonding. I believe that for this reason smaller countries that have been suppressed, like Greece, have such strong people. The families are fortresses. We have not ever felt threatened and as a result we have become arrogant, we're lost. No one has really felt the need to pray, because there is no fear of death. So people believed that security is only economic and physical, until such an event came and destroyed both. Only spiritual security exists, and this is faith, that is, prayer, and one just has to live it.

I think this text is eloquent enough and I fear to comment on it lest I perhaps destroy it. But I will do a little commentary to highlight two specific points.

First, that American life is pretty fragile, because it is based on the culture of money and there people believe that security is offered by financial and physical facilities. But in reality it creates a terrible insecurity, because with the first unsettling event everything collapses. There is no sense of a remembrance of death, which is why in reality the fear of death dominates.

The second point is that this American woman was altered so much spiritually from the Orthodox tradition, that she feels closer and more closely related to the Orthodox Greeks, which is why she views the terrorist attack as offering something good, despite the disaster. She sees that in Greece, because we have been oppressed numerous times, there are strong people, who are inspired by faith. And by praying for terrorists to repent and be saved she is living as an Orthodox. This is a major way in overcoming things.

And I wonder if Greece does have something important, which can play a large role in the contemporary way of life. Not that it only has beautiful places and beaches, nor that it has great philosophers of antiquity, although they in their time played an essential role, but mainly because it has the Orthodox Tradition and Romaic way of life, which inspires the people and makes them feel secure in their insecurity.

Ultimately, for one to be a Romios does not mean that they must be born Greek, but that they should be Orthodox in the fullest sense of the word and to follow the teachings of the Apostles and Fathers, wherever they may live, whether it is in Europe, America, Asia, Africa, Australia or New Zealand. A Romios can face things differently, with an existential reference and a meaningful way.

Source: Ekklesiastiki Paremvasi, "Μιά ορθόδοξη ερμηνεία των αποτελεσμάτων των τρομοκρατικών ενεργειών", November 2001. Translated by John Sanidopoulos.

July 4, 2013

The Spirit of American Society


The following message dates back to 2003 when America invaded Iraq, and is a response to those who opposed the war in Iraq with extreme slogans against America in Greece.

By Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos

These days everyone is watching with deep sadness and existential pain what is happening in Iraq. Everyone struggled, each in his own way, to prevent what is condescendingly called a war, since it is an illegal invasion. I participated in anti-war events in my Metropolis. Unfortunately the war happened, despite an international outcry, and now we hope and pray the consequences are as few as possible.

At the anti-war events there were heard several slogans. One of them was the famous slogan: "Americans, murderers of the people". I would like to express some thoughts about this slogan, because as we shall subsequently see, this slogan should not refer to the American people, but to its leaders.

The "spirit" of America

First, it should be noted that America is a contradictory society. Within itself it has contradictory elements. There are people who are inspired by the arrogance of power and world domination, and there are people who possess psychological and existential insecurity who seek psychological and ontological support.

The American writer and filmmaker Frank Schaeffer in his amazing book Dancing Alone: The Quest for Orthodox Faith in the Age of False Religion, which was translated by Archimandrite Augustine Myrou, analyzes with exact and clear knowledge the spirit which underlies American society.

In the beginning of the book he expressively writes:

"America is a nation, whose citizens we say believe in God, while at the same time we live and behave like atheists. Judged even by the minimum criterion of traditional Christian conduct, Americans can hardly be described as a 'Christian nation'. Compared with other cultures, we Americans are perhaps the most materialistic and corrupt people on earth. But, according to what we say about ourselves, we are 'religious' and even 'good' people."

In this book he expresses the truth that in America there are two prevailing trends. In the first are included the majority of people who think they are religious people, but their religiosity is largely due to their "great faith in false religions". The second trend is of the so-called "Knowledge Class" in which reside the "highly intellectual, political and the social stratum of our society". And of course this "order of experts" largely determines the spirit that prevails in America today.

Generally, the current that dominates American society is dominated with Calvinist Puritanism, the European Enlightenment, and the Romantic movement. These principles have permeated the American dream of creating a society of eudaimonistic happiness that is absolute sovereign in the world. Eudaimonism became associated with "Christian doctrine", as it was carried over by Calvinist migrants, and this "Christian" spirit became associated with tempered enlightenment principles of liberty, democracy and humanism.

What Americans seek

While this is the general spirit that prevails in America, and while the leaders of America are inspired by what I just spoke of, American society is dominated by an insecurity and a search for authentic life. There are many who react against the "Knowledge Class". There is also a large portion of people looking for a more authentic life that satisfies their internal and existential hunger, which is why existentialism was previously accepted.

When referring to Americans we must keep in mind that many are immigrants from all nations in the world and they are not perfectly tied with the aspirations of their leadership. Besides we have seen these days in the General Media that many Americans visibly and publicly reacted against the war in Iraq. For example, there are people from Greece, the Balkans, Turkey, Russia, Africa, Asia, Arabia, Syria, Lebanon, etc. And when you think that all of these usually were part of "national religions" and "national churches", which is a big problem for American society, then you have to conclude that things are not so simple and we cannot condemn all Americans because they are Americans.

There is a large portion of people who are disappointed by Calvinist Puritanism, which makes man confined to an outward ethic. They are also disappointed with rationalism and the enlightenment spirit, because it does not satisfy their existential hunger. So there are many who seek a religious basis. Not surprisingly, from this point of view, many Americans embrace Buddhism because in it they feel an answer to the suffering of life, and they embrace Islam because many elements of Western Christianity resemble the Muslim dream. Indeed, the eudaimonistic spirit, the domination of the world, the sanctification of war, and individualism are common in both Western Christianity and Islam.

Adding my own personal knowledge, I would like to note that there are a large portion of Americans today who are disappointed by the ideological-religious currents prevailing in their country, and they seek to find Orthodox truth with its neptic tradition. I have been invited to participate in several conferences and seminars in Seattle, Atlanta, Chicago, etc, and I saw the thirst of Americans for the hesychast tradition, as expressed and voiced by St. Symeon the New Theologian, St. Gregory Palamas, and many other philokalic Fathers. They are very interested in the communal and therapeutic spirit in the Orthodox Church. About ten of my books have been translated in English and disseminated widely in American society, and they are certainly creating widespread discussion, as seen from the letters I receive.

Therefore, when referring to the reprehensible actions of American leaders, we should be careful to not condemn all Americans, because there are prominent politicians, intellectuals, and many other people who have a different perception on these issues. Unfortunately, the "Knowledge Class", with their entire mindset, have the ability to create the right climate as well as disorient a large portion of American people. I at least have hope that the American people, with the insecurity it has, the contradictions that distinguish it, the existential dissatisfaction that pervades, together with the search for the historical Church which characterizes it and the effort to find existential answers, will be quite open to authentic Orthodox theology with its hesychastic and communal spirit, with love towards the person and society.

It is precisely for this reason that it is not the responsibility of the American people alone against the world, but us as well, especially the Orthodox, who have the responsibility to what extent we will be able to satisfy this existential void.

Source: Ekklesiastiki Paremvasi, "Η αμερικανική κοινωνία", March 2003. Translated by John Sanidopoulos.


June 25, 2013

Orthodox Saints and the Future of America


By Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos

The latest information from our press has announced a new book written about the late actress Marilyn Monroe by Joyce Carl Oates, which in reality is presented as a fictional biography. But what is important in this case and needs to be noted is that in the interview granted by the author of this book there is a characteristic quote: "In America cinematography is a religion. We don't have saints, but we have folklore" (Ελευθεροτυπία, 11/06/2000).

America is a young country, the so-called "new world", created after the migration of entire populations of Europe, primarily to find work. In this way the spirit of the Renaissance, the Reformation and the Enlightenment with all its consequences on individual and social life was transferred. So the spirit that prevails is rationalism and sensationalism. This affects all social behaviors, which is why Puritanism dominates the American land.

When one reads several books by American writers they will find that the examples they use come from films, which at their basis represent the American environment and the American atmosphere, where there is no deep theological or philosophical thought. This shows that indeed cinema is a religion in America, and actors are considered models and idols.

Frank Schaeffer, in his book Dancing Alone: The Quest for Orthodox Faith in the Age of False Religion, writes: "Unlike the ancient Orthodox Churches in various countries such as Palestine, Africa, Greece, Ukraine and Russia, the Orthodox Church in North America (with the exception of the Church in Alaska) is entirely a Church of migrants. The founders were not monks and missionaries, but people seeking to find a better life."

In the Roman Empire, known as Byzantium, the standards of our society were the Saints, the deified, whoever had communion with God at various levels. Even today in Greece we honor, celebrate and process our Saints. This is precisely the difference between our country and other countries, especially America. If we don't understand this truth we will not be able to understand the difference between us. For this reason Greece and the Greeks of America play an important role in changing the climate and culture in America. When the manners and customs of our country are transferred there, which at its basis is an ecclesiastical atmosphere and life, then the climate of America will change, which has been influenced by Protestantism, who rejected the Saints.

Our models should be the Saints and not the "American dream", in which there are no saints, but folktales from the fields of art, science and politics.

Source: Paremvasis, "Εποχή χωρίς Αγίους", March 2001. Translated by John Sanidopoulos.

April 20, 2013

Louis Tikas: A Greek-American Hero


Louis Tikas was a Greek-American immigrant born in Loutra, Crete as Elias Anastasiou Spantidakis. He was the main labor union organizer at the Ludlow camp during a 14-month coal strike in southern Colorado from 1913-1914. He was shot and killed during the Ludlow Massacre, the bloodiest event of the strike, on April 20, 1914, the day after Orthodox Christian Easter.



Below is an interview with Zeese Papanikolas about the Greek immigrant Louis Tikas. Papanikolas is the author of Buried Unsung, an account of Louis Tikas and the Ludlow Massacre.


April 5, 2013

Who Really Is A Bigot?


The word "bigot" is being thrown around more and more these days, especially since September 11, 2001 when the world woke up to the realization that there are a lot of "haters" in the world. At this time Militant Islam brought out the Militant Atheists which revealed Militant Secularism which helped give rise to Militant Politics (both liberal and conservative). One reaction gives birth to another reaction, so that the world is now a roaring flame from having reached a boiling point of extreme anger. As for who is right and who is wrong is not the issue, but the issue is how people use these movements to push their agendas, albeit in a very angry way. These days, for example, we have another extreme reaction where a very small group of people began getting a lot of media attention a few years ago for screaming "God hates fags!", and out of anger the opposition began yelling back "Bigots!". Very few in the world would agree with the former slogan, but the latter for me is very ambiguous and is being thrown around more and more by the rising Militant Secularist type against anything that disagrees with their position, especially if they are members of a religion or a different political party. For this reason I wanted to examine it a bit more to see how the word should be properly used, if used at all.

The exact origin of the word bigot is unknown. It may have come from the German bei and gott, or the English by God. William Camden wrote that the Normans were first called bigots, when their Duke Rollo, who receiving Gisla, daughter of King Charles, in marriage refused to kiss the king's foot in token of subjection, unless the king would hold it out for that purpose. Being urged to it by those present, Rollo answered hastily, "No by God", whereupon the King turning about, called him bigot; which name passed from him to his people. This story is likely fictional, as Gisla is unknown in Frankish sources. However, it is true that the French used the term bigot as an abuse for the Normans.

A bigot is most often defined as a prejudiced person who is intolerant of opinions, lifestyles, or identities differing from his or her own. In other words, a bigot may be any person who regards his own faith and views in matters of religion as unquestionably right, and any belief or opinion opposed to or differing from them as unreasonable or wicked. Or, a bigot is a person who is intolerant of opinions which conflict with his own, as in politics or morals; one obstinately and blindly devoted to his own church, party, belief, or opinion.

Outside of the word's common association with prejudice, the dictionary definition of a bigot includes one who holds rigidly to an idea. Again, holding to what you believe to be true is, by itself, not inherently bad. Even the simple act of one person believing another to be a bigot, and refusing to be convinced otherwise, is itself a prime example of bigotry. According to this definition EVERYONE is a bigot. Everyone has a group that they have no tolerance for. It doesn’t matter if you are liberal, conservative, or moderate. Consider this; a bigot is someone who says they aren't a bigot.

Bigot is also used as a term of derision to imply contempt or disapproval. One noteworthy example of this is how the word bigot is increasingly being used to defame those who do not believe marriage between homosexuals should be validated in church or public policy.

It’s much easier to call someone a bigot than to consider their arguments. Elbert Hubbard said: "If you can't answer a man's argument, all is not lost; you can still call him vile names." Name-calling is a form of an attack, based upon one’s prejudices, emotions, or special interests, rather than one’s intellect or reason. It draws a vague equivalence between a concept and a person, group or idea. By linking the person or idea being attacked to a negative symbol, the propagandist hopes that the audience will reject the person or the idea on the basis of the symbol, instead of looking at the available evidence.

It's always amusing to watch those who bellow and brag about how superior they are, become strident and defensive, when their views are questioned or challenged! The only defense one has to deflect the truth is to resort to derogatory comments and personal attacks. Name-calling is the attempt to distract the uninformed observer from the message by attacking the messenger. Thomas Jefferson wrote: "Resort is had to ridicule when reason is against us."

The most powerful and persuasive contributions are made by those that don’t resort to cheap name calling and show that they can articulate their rebuttal rather than resort to the lazy way out of personal abuse.

Those who resort to brow-beating, name-calling, bullying, bashing, harassment, threats, mockery, and rudeness, instead of humbly and honestly facing the real issue, only stroke their own ego. They stroke their ego even further when they consider themselves more tolerant than those whom they call bigots. Eric Hoffer declared: "Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength." Name-calling is verbal abuse; a crude substitute for argument. It is the strategy of cowards: If you don't agree with someone, shout him down and call him names, so you think you win. Those who resort to name calling IMMEDIATELY discredit themselves and any ideas they have regardless of the validity.

G. K. Chesterton wrote: "We call a man a bigot or a slave of dogma because he is a thinker who has thought thoroughly and to a definite end." He also confirmed: "The people who are the most bigoted are the people who have no convictions at all." 

Bigot is most simply defined as the favoring of one argument over another. Bigotry, in and of itself, is neither good nor bad, but simply an inclination towards one idea over another. Examples of bigotry could be a preference for ice cream over broccoli, believing that the earth is spherical instead of flat, or the inclination to think that the Bible causes more harm than good. The question is not "Who is a bigot", but rather "About what are you bigoted and why?"

Charles Spurgeon, England's best-known preacher during the second half of the nineteenth century, declared: "The glorious charity of the present day is such, that it believes lies to be as good as truth; and lies and truth have met together and kissed each other; and he that telleth truth is called a bigot, and truth has ceased to be honorable in the world!"

We are left with answering the question: who really is a bigot? We can safely assume that those who call others bigots are in reality yelling at their own reflection. In my opinion, we are left with only two choices - it is either that EVERYONE is a bigot or NOONE is a bigot. I leave it to the reader to decide which is the fairer choice.

January 19, 2013

Fairleigh Dickinson Poll On Conspiracy Theories


Sixty-three percent of registered voters in the U.S. buy into at least one political conspiracy theory, according to results from a recent Fairleigh Dickinson University Public Mind Poll. The nationwide survey of registered voters asked Americans to evaluate four different political conspiracy theories: 56 percent of Democrats and 75 percent of Republicans say that at least one is likely true. This includes 36 percent who think that President Obama is hiding information about his background and early life, 25 percent who think that the government knew about 9/11 in advance, and 19 percent who think the 2012 Presidential election was stolen.Generally, the more people know about current events, the less likely they are to believe in conspiracy theories – but not among Republicans, where more knowledge leads to greater belief in political conspiracies.

The most popular of these conspiracy theories is the belief that President Obama is hiding important information about his background and early life, which would include what’s often referred to “birtherism.” Thirty-six percent of Americans think this is probably true, including 64 percent of Republicans and 14 percent of Democrats.

“This conspiracy theory is much more widely believed mostly because it’s been discussed so often,” said Dan Cassino, a professor of political science at Fairleigh Dickinson University and an analyst for the poll. “People tend to believe that where there’s smoke, there’s fire – so the more smoke they see, the more likely they are to believe that something is going on.”

However, belief in such conspiracies is not limited to the political right. Twenty-five percent of registered voters think it’s probably true that President Bush knew about the 9/11 terrorist attacks before they happened, a figure that includes 36 percent of Democrats. Similarly, 23 percent of those interviewed say that President Bush’s supporters committed significant voter fraud to win him the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio. Belief in this conspiracy theory is highest among Democrats, (37 percent say it is likely true), though 17 percent of independents and 9 percent of Republicans think so as well.

“It’s easy to discount conspiracy theories about 9/11,” said Cassino, “but this isn’t some fringe belief. Trutherism is alive and well in America, and is only going to get stronger as memories of the actual event fade.”

Still even current events aren’t immune to conspiracy theories. Twenty percent of Americans think that President Obama’s supporters committed significant voter fraud in the 2012 elections. Thirty-six percent of Republicans think this is the case, but only 4 percent of Democrats do.

“These beliefs in election fraud pop up after every election,” said Cassino. “Americans tend to be politically isolated, and some can’t fathom that there are people who actually voted for the other guy, so the only way he could have won is through cheating.”

In general, higher levels of actual knowledge about politics tends to reduce belief in conspiracy theories. In the poll, respondents were asked a series of four questions about current events, and respondents who were able to answer more questions correctly were less likely to endorse the conspiracy theories. Fifteen percent of people who got none of the questions right thought that three or four of the conspiracies were likely, compared to three percent of those who answered three or four correctly. Education also tended to reduce belief in the conspiracy theories.

However, the relationship between current events knowledge and belief in conspiracy theories is conditional on partisanship. Among Democrats, each question answered correctly reduces the likelihood of endorsing at least one of the conspiracy theories by seven points. Among independents, each additional question reduces it by two points. For Republicans, though, each additional question answered correctly tends to increase belief in at least one of the theories by two points.

“There are several possible explanations for this,” said Cassino. “It could be that more conspiracy-minded Republicans seek out more information, or that the information some Republicans seek out just tends to reinforce these myths.”

Belief in these conspiracies is higher among young African-Americans than whites. For instance, 59 percent of African-Americans think that Bush knew about the 9/11 attacks before they happened, and 75 percent of African-Americans think at least one of the theories is likely true, compared with 62 percent of whites.

“Groups that feel more distanced from the political process are more likely to believe that sinister forces are at work,” said Cassino. “These figures tell us more about a lack of trust in the political process than acceptance of particular conspiracies.”

The Fairleigh Dickinson University poll of 814 registered voters was conducted nationally by telephone with both landline and cell phones from December 10 through December 16, 2012, and has a margin of error of +/-3.4 percentage points.

January 18, 2013

Sanity in the City


“To live sanely in Los Angeles (or, I suppose, in any other large American city) you have to cultivate the art of staying awake. You must learn to resist (firmly but not tensely) the unceasing hypnotic suggestions of the radio, the billboards, the movies and the newspapers; those demon voices which are forever whispering in your ear what you should desire, what you should fear, what you should wear and eat and drink and enjoy, what you should think and do and be. They have planned a life for you – from the cradle to the grave and beyond – which it would be easy, fatally easy, to accept. The least wandering of the attention, the least relaxation of your awareness, and already the eyelids begin to droop, the eyes grow vacant, the body starts to move in obedience to the hypnotist’s command. Wake up, wake up – before you sign that seven-year contract, buy that house you don’t really want, marry that girl you secretly despise. Don’t reach for the whisky, that won’t help you. You’ve got to think, to discriminate, to exercise your own free will and judgment. And you must do this, I repeat, without tension, quite rationally and calmly. For if you give way to fury against the hypnotists, if you smash the radio and tear the newspapers to shreds, you will only rush to the other extreme and fossilize into defiant eccentricity.”

-- Christopher Isherwood, “Los Angeles” from Exhumations (1966)

November 22, 2012

Squanto: A Special Instrument of God


By John Sanidopoulos

When reading the writings and histories of the early American settlers, a common theme one comes across time and time again is the Providence of God. Faced with insurmountable obstacles in trying to settle in a new land, when these settlers felt they had been especially blessed by God, they gave thanks as a community, knowing that all good things come from Above. The Providence of God was displayed in diverse ways, but for the Pilgrims who settled in Plymouth, Massachusetts in 1620, it came in the form of a Native American person - his name was Squanto.

Most Americans are familiar with certain aspects of Squanto's life, but what caused William Bradford, the Governor of the Plymouth Colony, to call him “a special instrument sent of God” for the good of the colonists?

Little is known of Squanto's early life. Historians date his birth sometime between 1585 and 1592. Tisquantum was his real name and he was from the the Patuxet tribe of the Wampanoag Confederacy. In 1614, Tisquantum was kidnapped by Englishman Thomas Hunt, one of John Smith's lieutenants. Hunt was planning to sell fish, corn, and captured natives in Malaga, Spain. There, Hunt attempted to sell Tisquantum and a number of other Native Americans into slavery in Spain for £20 a piece.

Sir Ferdinando Georges, an early English colonial entrepreneur who has been called "the Father of English Colonization in North America," related an account of the incident:

...it happened there had beene one Hunt ... [who] seized upon the poore innocent creatures, that in confidence of his honestie had put themselves into his hands. And stowing them under Hatches, to the number of twentie foure, carried them into the Sraits, where he sought to sell them for slaves, and sold as many as he could get money for. But the Friers of those parts took the rest from them, and kept them to be instructed in the Christian Faith; and so disappointed this new and Devillish project.

As Georges says, Hunt captured 24 Native Americans and locked them “under Hatches.” Imagine the horror that these young men felt. They were locked below deck in deplorable conditions for days, while the ship sailed across the harsh Atlantic Ocean. They did not know where they were being taken or what would happen to them when they arrived. Hunt brought Squanto and his fellow prisoners to Spain where he intended to sell them as slaves in the Malaga Slave Market. Providentially for Squanto, a group of Spanish monks intervened and stopped the sale. These monks greeted this bound young Indian with the words, “Estas libre,” meaning “You are free.” So Squanto, after facing tremendous fear and panic for days at the hands of a tyrant, was introduced to Christianity with a spirit of love. They took Squanto into their care and taught him the Christian faith. Though little is known of Squanto’s time in Spain, he was able to survive life in a country where people spoke a foreign language and lead a lifestyle that bore no resemblance to the way he had lived in his homeland. One biographer said he began to love Jesus at this time. Now a free man, Squanto ventured for a way to return home.

After Squanto went back to England he began searching to find a way to go back home to America. He managed to get to London, where he lived with, and worked for a few years with John Slany, a shipbuilder. After a failed attempt to return in 1618, at last in 1619 Squanto returned to his homeland aboard John Smith’s ship, having joined an exploratory expedition along the New England coast, led by Captain Thomas Dermer. He soon discovered to his horror that the Patuxet, as well as a majority of coastal New England tribes (mostly Wampanoag and Massachusett), had been killed off the year before by an epidemic plague, possibly smallpox; it has recently been postulated as having been leptospirosis. Native Americans had no natural immunity to European infectious diseases.

Having discovered that his tribe was extinct and villages for miles inland were completely empty, Squanto eventually found a few survivors from neighboring villages, who brought him to Massasoit, chief of the Wampanoag. Massasoit told him of the grisly details of a spreading plague which had killed 90% of the native people of the region.

When the Mayflower arrived on the shores of Massachusetts in 1620, with its 102 passengers and about 30 crew members, it was welcomed by a harsh winter climate. Due to exposure, disease and shortages of food, only 53 Pilgrims survived their first New England winter. Fortunately, they happened to settle on land that the Patuxet tribe once occupied, whose last survivor just happened to know fluent English.

Massasoit, perhaps because of Squanto’s close association with Europeans, placed him and another native from Maine named Samoset under house arrest in the village of Pokanoket (near what is today Bristol, Rhode Island.) At the end of the winter, Massasoit and his people considered sending Samoset and/or Squanto to talk with the Pilgrims, since both of them could speak English. Ultimately, Massasoit decided to send only Samoset to greet the Pilgrims because he did not want to chance losing both of them and he did not want to risk sending Squanto, who was his best translator.

On March 16, 1621 Samoset walked up to a group of Englishmen and said “Welcome Englishman! Welcome Englishman!”

Later Massasoit met with Plymouth Governor John Carver. Squanto was the translator. With his assistance, they signed a treaty of peace. Massasoit signed for his people and the Pilgrims signed as emissaries of King James. The peace treaty lasted more than fifty years.

After signing the treaty, Massasoit was so pleased with the work of Samoset and Squanto that he granted them their freedom. Samoset returned to his homeland in Maine. Squanto, who probably knew more English than any other native person in North America at that time, decided to stay with the Pilgrims as the colony’s chief interpreter and agent in their interaction with all native people.

That spring and summer Squanto proved himself invaluable. He led them to brooks brimming with herring beginning their spring migration upstream. He showed the Pilgrims how to fish with traps. He taught them where to stalk game in the forest. The children learned what berries they could pick for their families. Twenty acres of corn grew tall after Squanto showed the Pilgrims how to plant fish (as natural fertilizer) with the native corn seeds from a local tribe.

Historians have conjectured that had not Squanto been at that right place at the right time, the early Plymouth settlement would simply have not been. The people would have starved to death and the America as we know it today would have been drastically different.

William Bradford knew exactly Squanto’s worth, when he says:

…Squanto continued with them and was their interpreter and was a special instrument sent of God for their good beyond their expectation. He directed them how to set their corn, where to take fish, and to procure other commodities, and was also their pilot to bring them to unknown places for their profit, and never left them till he died.

On his way back from a meeting to repair damaged relations between the Wampanoag and Pilgrims, Squanto became sick with a fever. He began bleeding from the nose. Some historians have speculated that he was poisoned by the Wampanoag because they believed he had been disloyal to the chief. Squanto died a few days later in November of 1622 in Chatham, Massachusetts. He was buried in an unmarked grave.

Governor William Bradford, in Bradford's History of the English Settlement, wrote regarding Squanto's death:

Here [Manamoick Bay] Squanto fell ill of Indian fever, bleeding much at the nose, which the Indians take as a symptom of death, and within a few days he died. He begged the Governor to pray for him, that he might go to the Englishman's God in heaven, and bequeathed several of his things to his English friends, as remembrances. His death was a great loss.

Squanto is the ultimate survivor. He survived kidnapping, harsh treatment, and an attempt to sell him as a slave in Spain. In the world as existed in the 17th century, living in foreign cultures, without being trained to speak either Spanish or English, he was able to find his way back to England and back to North America in the Cupids Cove Colony. He made his way home to Patuxet only to find that everyone he knew had died of a plague. He was able to assimilate all that he had learned and became a special instrument sent to the Pilgrims of God for their good beyond their expectation.

History of the Many First Thanksgivings


June Hunt
November 19, 2012

Thanksgiving Day in the United States abounds with historic images of black-hatted, silver-buckled Pilgrims joining Native Americans in an outdoor New England feast of wild fowl, fish and grain. Certainly today's Thanksgiving feast is inspired by the traditional stories about the Pilgrims, but this celebration isn't exactly the very first American Thanksgiving.

Consider this: The 1564 French Huguenots in Florida ... the 1598 Spanish conquistadors near present-day El Paso ... the 1610 Virginia settlers of Jamestown – they all hold claim to celebrating the "first" Thanksgiving in North America before the arrival of the Pilgrims in Massachusetts.

Picture the French Huguenots in Florida – 1564

After building Fort Caroline to establish a settlement on the St. John's River near Jacksonville, French Protestants joined with local Indians in celebration. This simple event involved a modest feast, prayer and music. One of the French officers wrote: "We sang a psalm of Thanksgiving unto God, beseeching Him that it would please His Grace to continue His accustomed goodness toward us." But due to conflict with Spain over possession of the territory, the settlement was destroyed within a few years.

Picture the Spanish Conquistadors in Texas – 1598

Led by Juan de Onate, an expedition of about 500 crossed the Chihuahuan Desert to reach the Rio Grande River. After their harrowing journey across the wasteland, they rested on the banks of the river, offered thanks to God and feasted. Their journey and colonization was the start of European settlements in the American Southwest.

Picture the Virginia Settlers in Jamestown – 1610

The early years of the Jamestown settlement were marked by famine, disease and death. After the winter of 1609-1610, a population that had reached nearly 500 was reduced to about 60 settlers. When ships arrived carrying food in the spring of 1610, the settlers responded with a spontaneous prayer service.

The Traditional Picture of the Massachusetts Pilgrims

In November of 1620 after a voyage totaling more than 3,000 miles, dissenters from the Church of England, commonly known as Pilgrims, landed at Cape Cod to establish a new settlement and exercise religious freedom. The first winter and spring was a trying time for the colonists as disease, cramped quarters and bitter cold all took a toll.

In the early months of their quest, 50 of the 102 settlers died with only a handful remaining unscathed by the harsh environment.4 By the summer and autumn of 1621, the Pilgrims rebounded and gathered a bountiful harvest while enjoying plentiful fishing and hunting. Nearly 100 Native Americans joined 52 Englishmen to feast for three days to celebrate the harvest and God's blessings.

The Role of Abraham Lincoln

Thanksgiving proclamations were sporadically made by presidents and governors, but in 1863, President Abraham Lincoln established a day for giving thanks as a national tradition. Desiring to unite a nation torn apart by war, Lincoln wrote of prosperity, population increase and emerging harmony as signs of God's mercy even in the face of battle.

This president called all Americans to "a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens," while asking God to bring peace as well as to tenderly care for widows, orphans and all those who were suffering because of the Civil War.

Our Historic Thanksgiving Heritage

Americans are a unique combination of diverse cultures and traditions, evidenced by several competing "first" Thanksgivings. Our nation has a rich heritage that recognizes God's sovereign rule, offering gratitude to Him even in times of adversity. Thanksgiving to God is the common element that links the early French, Spanish and English settlers as well as Americans of the Civil War period.

No matter where you are or whatever your needs, take time to be grateful. When we come to God with our requests and concerns filtered through thanksgiving, the Bible makes it plain – we will receive the peace only He can give, a peace that passes all understanding.

Remember what the apostle Paul wrote, while chained under house arrest, "Do not be anxious about anything, but in every situation, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus" (Philippians 4:6-7 NIV).

Abraham Lincoln's Atheist Period


Stephen Mansfield
November 16, 2012

We have heard the soaring phrases often. They are fixed in the American book of verse. Now, they sound again in Steven Spielberg's magnificent film, "Lincoln."

They come to us as tones of faith from Abraham Lincoln's presidential speeches: "a firm reliance on Him who has never yet forsaken this favored land," "the Almighty has his own purposes," "that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom," and "the judgments of the Lord are true." They suggest a God who rules in the affairs of men and does so with both love and justice.

Yet this God was not always Abraham Lincoln's God. In his early years, Lincoln hated this being. It was a natural response. He was thoroughly convinced that God, in turn, hated Abraham Lincoln. It is one of the most surprising facts of Lincoln's life, a fact that makes his religious journey among the most unique in our history.

The 16th president of the United States was born on an American frontier swept by almost violent religious revivals. Men routinely responded to preaching and the "Spirit's work" by shouting, convulsing, passing out and even barking. Few were caught up in this excitement more eagerly than Thomas and Nancy Lincoln.

Their intelligent, sensitive son found it all too much. Young Abraham rejected his parents' loud, sweaty brand of faith and in part because he could not reconcile the weepy, religious version of his father with the man who beat him, worked him "like a slave," and resented his dreams of a more meaningful life. Historian Allen Guelzo has written, "on no other point did Abraham Lincoln come closer to an outright repudiation of his father than on religion."

Young Abraham chose reading over religion -- and reading made him rethink religion. Alongside "Aesop's Fables" and "Robinson Crusoe," he read the works of religious skeptics. Books like Thomas Paine's "Age of Reason," Edward Gibbon's "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire," and "Ruins" by the French writer Volney gave Lincoln the intellectual tools for dismantling the edifice of religion.

His move to the Illinois village of New Salem did the same. As his friend and biographer, William Herndon, wrote of this time, "he was surrounded by a class of people exceedingly liberal in matters of religion. Volney's 'Ruins' and Paine's 'Age of Reason' passed from hand to hand." Lincoln drank deeply from this anti-religion stream. Soon he began openly attacking Christianity. Friends recalled that he openly criticized the Bible, that he called Christ a bastard and that he labeled Christianity a myth. He even wrote a pamphlet defending "infidelity." To protect his political aspirations, friends tore the booklet from his hands and burned it. Lincoln was furious. He had become the village atheist.

His closest friends doubted his atheism, though, believing that he used it to mask a deeper pain: the suspicion that God had cursed him. This grew from his mother's "illegitimate" birth. Lincoln felt tainted by it. Herndon recalled "rumors of bastardy" that convinced Lincoln "God has cursed and crushed him especially." His outspoken atheism was actually "a blast, Job-like, of despair."

Lincoln lived under this angry cloud during his first ventures into politics, into a troubled marriage and through the sufferings that marred his life and assured him of his curse. Oddly, it was through the portal of these very sufferings that faith slowly returned.

When little Eddie Lincoln died in 1850, just shy of his fourth birthday, his parents were devastated. Ever haunted by depression, Abraham needed help pushing back the darkness. He turned to the Rev. James Smith, a Presbyterian minister in Springfield. The two met, counseled and prayed. Slowly, unsteadily, a change began.

It was the bugle call of Lincoln's epic battle for faith. Though he never joined a church and seldom spoke of Jesus Christ publicly, he became our most spiritual chief executive, sometimes more prophet than president.

We see this in his decision to issue the Emancipation Proclamation. He told his cabinet he did it because of a covenant he made with God. He would end slavery where he could if God would grant the Union significant victories. He had become convinced the war was divine judgment upon a slave-trading nation. He believed the act of Emancipation could help lift that judgment.

This same sense of need to mediate between God and the nation infused his Second Inaugural Address, perhaps the greatest of American political sermons. God wills this war, Lincoln said, in order to purge the wickedness of slavery. Now, at war's end, both North and South should humble themselves, honor God's righteous judgment, and heal the land through forgiveness and mercy. It tells us much about Lincoln's religious views in the latter years of his presidency that he expected the speech to disappoint the nation. Why? "Men are not flattered by being shown that there has been a difference of purpose between the Almighty and them," he explained to a friend.

This "difference of purpose" was a reality Lincoln knew well. He had suffered under it, hated God for it, and, ultimately, tried to heal it in himself and in the nation. We should be thankful that he did, for these efforts helped to give us our greatest president.

September 11, 2012

Elder Ambrose Foretold the September 11th Attacks


Towards the end of August 2001, someone asked Elder Ambrose of Dadiou to pray to Saint Nektarios to help him, and the Elder said:

“Let the Saint be, my child. He is now in America running to save lives”.

On September 11th, the disaster at the Twin Towers took place. Some months earlier he had seen what was going to happen and had warned that it was going to change history.

"A great evil will begin in America, and not just in September. Alas!"

He had given this warning to the Metropolitan of Sisaniou, Anthony, in one of the latter’s visits, in the presence of other people. However, he did not give any explanation.

"Your Eminence, wait and see what calamity will befall the Americans in two months."


Elder Ambrose is pictured hugging the Metropolitan of Sisaniou, Anthony. 

July 4, 2012

Jefferson's Support For Intelligent Design


Stephen C. Meyer
July 15, 2009

IN THE battle over how to teach evolution in public schools, Thomas Jefferson’s demand for a “separation between church and state’’ has been cited countless times. Many argue that the controversial alternative to Darwinian evolution, intelligent design, is an exclusively religious idea and therefore cannot be discussed under the Constitution. By invoking Jefferson’s principle of separation, many critics of intelligent design assume that this visionary Founding Father would agree with them.

But would he? For too long, an aspect of Jefferson’s visionary thought has been ignored, hidden away as too uncomfortable for public discussion - his support for intelligent design.

In 1823, when materialist evolutionary ideas had long been circulating, Jefferson wrote to John Adams and insisted that the scientific evidence of design in nature was clear: “I hold (without appeal to revelation) that when we take a view of the Universe, in its parts general or particular, it is impossible for the human mind not to perceive and feel a conviction of design, consummate skill, and indefinite power in every atom of its composition.’’ It was on empirical grounds, not religious ones, that he took this view.

Contemplating everything from the heavenly bodies down to the creaturely bodies of men and animals, he argued: “It is impossible, I say, for the human mind not to believe that there is, in all this, design, cause and effect, up to an ultimate cause, a fabricator of all things from matter and motion.’’

The “ultimate cause" and “fabricator of all things’’ that Jefferson invoked was also responsible for the “design’’ of life’s endlessly diverse forms as well as the manifestly special endowments of human beings. Moreover, because the evidence of “Nature’s God’’ was publicly accessible to all and did not depend upon a special appeal to religious authority, Jefferson believed that it provided a basis in reason for the protection of individual liberty. Thus, the Declaration of Independence asserted that humans are “endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.’’

Of course, many people assume that Jefferson’s views, having been written before Darwin’s “Origin of Species,’’ are now scientifically obsolete. But Jefferson has been vindicated by modern scientific discoveries that Darwin could not have anticipated. For example, in 1953 when Watson and Crick elucidated the structure of the DNA molecule, they made a startling discovery. The structure of DNA allows it to store information in the form of a four-character digital code. Strings of precisely sequenced chemicals called nucleotide bases store and transmit the assembly instructions - the information - for building the crucial protein molecules and machines the cell needs to survive. Francis Crick later developed this idea with his famous “sequence hypothesis,’’ according to which the chemical constituents in DNA function like letters in a written language or symbols in a computer code. As Bill Gates has noted, “DNA is like a computer program, but far, far more advanced than any software we’ve ever created.’’

This discovery has made acute a longstanding scientific mystery that Darwin never addressed or solved: the mystery of how the very first life on earth arose. To date no theory of undirected chemical evolution has explained the origin of the digital information in DNA needed to build the first living cell on earth. Yet modern scientists who argue for intelligent design do not do so merely because natural processes have failed to explain the origin of the information in cells. Instead, they argue for design because systems possessing these features invariably arise from intelligent causes.

DNA functions like a software program. We know that software comes from programmers. Information - whether inscribed in hieroglyphics, written in a book, or encoded in a radio signal - always arises from an intelligent source. So the discovery of digital code in DNA provides a strong scientific reason for concluding that the information in DNA also had an intelligent source.

Design is an inference from biological data, not a deduction from religious authority. Jefferson said just that, and based his political thinking on it. The evidence for what he presciently called “Nature’s God’’ is stronger than ever. Our nation’s existence, with its guarantee to protect each person’s “inalienable rights,’’ may be counted among the fruits of Jefferson’s belief in intelligent design.

BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER