Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



July 6, 2017

Athonite Romanian Skete of Saint John the Forerunner Denies Cessation of Commemoration of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew


The Romanian Skete of St John the Forerunner (Prodromos) of Mount Athos has issued a communique in which it denied the cessation of commemoration of the Ecumenical Patriarch at the divine services, as false information disseminated by the media.

Moreover, the communique sheds light upon the case of some monastics, excluded from the Skete, who have spread false information on behalf of the Romanian Skete.

Please find below the full text of the communique.

+ + +

26 June 2017

Communique
No. 169

Because through various means of information, especially on the Internet, there continues to appear news that does not reflect the reality of the Romanian Skete of the Prodromos of Holy Mount Athos, which cause offense and bewilderment among believers, it is our duty to make the following clarifications:

- The name of the hierarch under whose canonical jurisdiction lies our Skete – as well as the entire Holy Mount Athos – that is of His Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew is commemorated at all divine services officiated in the Skete.

- The commemoration of the name of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew has never been interrupted in the Skete.

- The monastic community has never raised the question of interrupting the commemoration of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, so there has never been a vote of fifty monastics of the community to approve the interruption of the commemoration of his name.

- The commemoration of the name of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew was not imposed by the will of any authority outside the Skete, but rather from the very desire of the monastic community to remain in communion with the hierarch under whose protection it lies, and with the entire Orthodox Church.

- The Romanian Skete of the Prodromos has never sent and does not send representatives to public meetings organized without the blessing of the local hierarch and in which people are urged to break away from the Church. Those who in such circumstances present themselves as Athonite Fathers or monastics of the Prodromos and use the images, the logos and the icons of the Prodromos Skete, or even make statements in the name of the Skete, as though they were representatives of Prodromos Skete, do not have our blessing, nor are they in agreement with our monastic community.

- We are deeply concerned that the name of the Romanian Skete of the Prodromos is used to create disunion in the Church, using impolite methods to manipulate believers by disseminating false information referring to some events that occurred in the Skete, with the obvious purpose of creating a deceptive impression about the real situation and in complete contradiction with the evangelical spirit both through the language used and through the contents of the published material.

- Moreover, through methods foreign to Christian living and following insistent misinformation about the recent ecclesiastical events, some statements were taken by force from Elder Julian of Prodromos through which the believers are urged to interrupt the commemoration of the hierarchs of the Church, statements that are in full contradiction with the practice and the life-long teachings of Elder Julian.

- The purported information that five monks who separated themselves from the monastic body of the Skete through their non-participation in the liturgical life have been sequestered, placed under canon, persecuted or subjected to various pressures is untrue. On the contrary, with paternal love, with much patience and indulgence, our brothers have been directed on the path to salvation according to the teachings of the Holy Fathers, in accordance with the sacred canons of the Orthodox Church and with the rules of monastic life, thus the economy applied in their case has far exceeded the boundaries set by the rules. However, the monks concerned continue to live a self-governing life – they exit the Holy Mountain and return to the Skete without any blessing, they do not participate in the divine services of the Skete, nor in other community activities – and denigrate those who do not share their point of view.

At the same time, we express our deep sorrow for the discords that have recently appeared in the life of the Church, which, with more wisdom and prayer, could have been avoided.

For the future, in order to be protected against possible bewilderment and confusion that might be generated by some communiques on current ecclesiastical themes related to the Romanian Skete of the Prodromos, we ask the true-believing Christians to regard as true only the official documents bearing the seal of the Skete, the abbot’s signature and a registration number.

With love in Christ,

The Abbot of the Romanian Skete Prodromos
Archimandrite Athanasios of Prodromos
And the brethren in Christ together with me


BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER