Showing posts with label Christology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christology. Show all posts

The Timeliness of Saint Maximus the Confessor


By Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos and Agiou Vlasiou

(Sermon Delivered in the Metropolitan Church of Ioannina 
on 21 January 2020)

First of all, I would like to warmly thank His Eminence the Metropolitan of Ioannina and beloved brother in Christ, Maximos, for the ministry of the word that he has entrusted to me, and especially today, when the great teacher of our Church celebrates, Saint Maximus the Confessor, whose name the Metropolitan and my beloved brother in Christ bears.

Your Eminence Metropolitan of Ioannina and beloved brother Maximos, revered chorus of Hierarchs, Priests of God the Most High, ministry of Christ, most honorable leaders and chosen Christians:

It is known to all of you that from the time your Metropolitan, who bears the name of Saint Maximus, came here to Ioannina, various speeches have been made about this great teacher of the Church. Saint Maximus lived in the seventh century, in a very difficult century in many ways, and he became a foremost teacher of our Church and a great theologian, a soaring eagle of theology.

The Christological Teaching of St. John of Damascus (Fr. John Romanides)

 
By Prof. John S. Romanides 
University of Thessaloniki
 
Having lived and written during the century following the Sixth Ecumenical Council, St. John of Damascus represents the Orthodox Theological Tradition, which was still living in the interpretive atmosphere created by the debates surrounding the Sixth Council. It is quite natural, therefore, that the Fathers of this Council, Sts. Maximus the Confessor and Sophronius of Jerusalem, should exercise a very strong influence on his teachings concerning the Person of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
      
At the same time, the Damascene sees clearly from his vantage point the lines of terminological development from the Third Ecumenical Council through the Fourth and Fifth Ecumenical Councils within the framework of the Fathers of these Councils. At the same time, he is a master of the presuppositions of the Trinitarian debate enveloping the decisions of the First and Second Ecumenical Councils and sees clearly the complete interdependence or even identity, which exists between the doctrines of the Holy Trinity and Christology.
      

Did the Apostle Luke, Like the Apostle John, Refer to Jesus as the Word of God?

 
 
Did the Apostle Luke in his Gospel, like the Apostle John in his Gospel (Jn. 1:1), refer to Jesus as the Word (Logos) of God? The patristic testimony unanimously affirms that he did, specifically in Luke 1:2 where it says: "...just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the Word." In most translations of "Word" it is not capitalized, so the idea is conveyed that it is actually speaking of words, such as the way Protestants refer to Scripture, but the context is clear that this Word had eyewitnesses and servants, therefore referring to a person, specifically Jesus Christ. Below are four early patristic interpretations of Luke 1:2 to make this clearer:

Sixth and Seventh Homily for Holy Thursday (St. Cyril of Alexandria)


By St. Cyril of Alexandria

(Commentary on Luke, Sermon 146)

Luke 22:39-42,45,46. And He came out and went, as He was wont, to the Mount of Olives; and the disciples also followed Him. And when He was at the place, He said to them, "Pray that you enter not into temptation." And He went apart from them about a stone's throw, and knelt down and prayed, saying, "Father, if You will, put away this cup from Me: but not My will, but Yours be done." And He rose up from prayer, and went to the disciples, and found them asleep from sorrow. And He said to them, "Why sleep you? Arise, pray that you enter not into temptation."

The Didactic Nature of Jesus Weeping According to Basil the Great and John Chrysostom


By St. Basil the Great

Now, as for the fact that the Lord wept over Lazarus and the city, we have this to say: He ate and drank, not because He needed these things Himself, but so as to leave you with measures and limits by which to control the unavoidable emotions of the soul. Thus, He wept in order to correct the propensity to excessive emotion and dejection among those given to mourning and lamentation. For if there is anything that needs to be moderated by reason, it is weeping: that is, over what things, to what extent, when, and how it is proper to weep. For that the Lord's weeping was not emotional, but didactic, is clear from this verse: "Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; but I go, that I may awake him out of sleep" (John 11:11). Who among us mourns for a sleeping friend, whom he expects to awake after a short while? "Lazarus, come forth" (John 11:43). And the dead man was brought back to life; he who was bound walked. This is a miracle within a miracle: that his feet were bound with grave-clothes and yet were not prevented from moving. That which strengthened him was greater than that which impeded him.

St. Ephraim the Syrian on Christ's Divine and Human Natures


By St. Ephraim the Syrian

(Excerpt from the Homily on the Transfiguration)

The facts themselves bear witness and his divine acts of power teach those who doubt that he is true God, and his sufferings show that he is true man. And if those who are feeble in understanding are not fully assured, they will pay the penalty on his dread day.

If he was not flesh, why was Mary introduced at all? And if he was not God, whom was Gabriel calling Lord?

If he was not flesh, who was lying in the manger? And if he was not God, whom did the Angels come down and glorify?

If he was not flesh, who was wrapped in swaddling clothes? And if he was not God, whom did the shepherds worship?

The Messiah in the Old and New Testaments


By Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos and Agiou Vlasiou

One of the basic phrases associated with St Andrew the First-Called Apostle is his statement to his brother Simon, the Apostle Peter: “We have found the Messiah (which is translated, the Christ)" (John 1:41).

This raises the question of how St Andrew understood the word ‘Messiah’ and what exactly he meant. Is he referring to a messianic expectation that existed in his time among the Jews, and to the appearance of a political leader to liberate them from Roman domination? Or is this a matter of empirical faith, which is connected with Christ as the true God Who took flesh?

Before he said these words, the Apostle Andrew, together with St John the Theologian, had been in the company of St John the Forerunner. He had heard him say of Jesus, “Behold the Lamb of God!” (John 1:36), and he had followed Him. At some point “Jesus turned, and seeing them following, said to them, ‘What do you seek?’” They asked Him where He was staying. Christ replied, “Come and see.” And “they came and saw where He was staying, and remained with Him that day” (John 1:38-40).

What it Means That Christ Sits at the Right Hand of the Father (St. John of Damascus)


By St. John of Damascus

After Christ was risen from the dead He laid aside all His passions, I mean His corruption or hunger or thirst or sleep or weariness or such like. For, although He did taste food after the resurrection [Luke 24:43], yet He did not do so because it was a law of His nature (for He felt no hunger), but in the way of economy, in order that He might convince us of the reality of the resurrection, and that it was one and the same flesh which suffered and rose again. But He laid aside none of the divisions of His nature, neither body nor spirit, but possesses both the body and the soul intelligent and reasonable, volitional and energetic, and in this wise He sits at the right hand of the Father, using His will both as God and as man in behalf of our salvation, energizing in His divine capacity to provide for and maintain and govern all things, and remembering in His human capacity the time He spent on earth, while all the time He both sees and knows that He is adored by all rational creation. For His Holy Spirit knows that He is one in substance with God the Word, and shares as Spirit of God and not simply as Spirit the worship accorded to Him. Moreover, His ascent from earth to heaven, and again, His descent from heaven to earth, are manifestations of the energies of His circumscribed body. For He shall so come again to you, says he, in like manner as you have seen Him go into Heaven [Acts 1:11].

Why Did the Jews Who Came To Arrest Jesus Fall to the Ground When They Approached Him?


John 18:4-6 - Jesus therefore, knowing all the things that were coming upon Him, went forth, and said unto them, "Whom do you seek?" They answered Him, "Jesus of Nazareth." Jesus said unto them, "I am He." And Judas also, which betrayed Him, was standing with them. When therefore He said unto them, "I am He," they went backward, and fell to the ground.

The Christology of Saint Gregory the Theologian


By Stylianos Gerasimos

Saint Gregory the Theologian, addressing the Apollinarian teaching, opposed it with a Christological teaching within the Tradition of the Church.

Saint Gregory clearly stresses in his letter to the Presbyter Cledonius: "I never have and never can honor anything above the Nicene Faith, that of the Holy Fathers who met there to destroy the Arian heresy; but am, and by God's help ever will be, of that faith; completing in detail that which was incompletely said by them concerning the Holy Spirit; for that question had not then been mooted, namely, that we are to believe that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are of one Godhead, thus confessing the Spirit also to be God."

Therefore, the center of the Christology of Saint Gregory, we could say, is the Creed of Nicaea regarding the consubstantiality of the Son with the Father. Saint Gregory stresses the real union of the two natures, the divine and human, in the person of Christ. When the Son and Word of God was incarnated, He received the entire human nature for the salvation of the human race.

"For we do not sever the Man from the Godhead, but we lay down as a dogma the Unity and Identity of Person, Who of old was not Man but God, and the Only Son before all ages, unmingled with body or anything corporeal; but Who in these last days has assumed Manhood also for our salvation; passible in His Flesh, impassible in His Godhead; circumscript in the body, uncircumscript in the Spirit; at once earthly and heavenly, tangible and intangible, comprehensible and incomprehensible; that by One and the Same Person, Who was perfect Man and also God, the entire humanity fallen through sin might be created anew."

Gregory goes on to explain: "If anyone does not believe that Holy Mary is the Mother of God, he is severed from the Godhead. If anyone should assert that He passed through the Virgin as through a channel, and was not at once divinely and humanly formed in her (divinely, because without the intervention of a man; humanly, because in accordance with the laws of gestation), he is in like manner godless. If any assert that the Manhood was formed and afterward was clothed with the Godhead, he too is to be condemned. For this were not a Generation of God, but a shirking of generation. If any introduce the notion of Two Sons, one of God the Father, the other of the Mother, and discredits the Unity and Identity, may he lose his part in the adoption promised to those who believe aright. For God and Man are two natures, as also soul and body are; but there are not two Sons or two Gods. For neither in this life are there two manhoods; though Paul speaks in some such language of the inner and outer man. And (if I am to speak concisely) the Savior is made of elements which are distinct from one another (for the invisible is not the same with the visible, nor the timeless with that which is subject to time), yet He is not two Persons. God forbid! For both natures are one by the combination, the Deity being made Man, and the Manhood deified or however one should express it. And I say different Elements, because it is the reverse of what is the case in the Trinity; for There we acknowledge different Persons so as not to confound the persons; but not different Elements, for the Three are One and the same in Godhead."

In confronting the positions of the Apollinarians regarding the incarnation of the Word, Saint Gregory presents a Christology directly related to Soteriology. "If anyone has put his trust in Him as a Man without a human mind, he is really bereft of mind, and quite unworthy of salvation. For that which He has not assumed He has not healed; but that which is united to His Godhead is also saved. If only half Adam fell, then that which Christ assumes and saves may be half also; but if the whole of his nature fell, it must be united to the whole nature of Him that was begotten, and so be saved as a whole."

It should be noted that, because Saint Gregory refers to the union between the divine and human hypostasis in the person of the Word, he uses the terms "μίξις" (mingling), "κράσις" (blending), "σύγκρασις" (blending together) and "συμφυΐα" (unite). With these terms Saint Gregory stresses the real union between the two hypostases in the person of the Word, without meaning the deterioration of each of the two natures. Thus God the Word received human nature and He exalted and deified it. The Son of God now descends to the world as the God-man and offers people the opportunity to become deified. People now have the opportunity to become immortal, because it was done by God the Word.

"The Word of God Himself — Who is before all worlds, the Invisible, the Incomprehensible, the Bodiless, Beginning of Beginning, the Light of Light, the Source of Life and Immortality, the Image of the Archetypal Beauty, the immovable Seal, the unchangeable Image, the Father's Definition and Word, came to His own Image, and took on Himself flesh for the sake of our flesh, and mingled Himself with an intelligent soul for my soul's sake, purifying like by like; and in all points except sin was made man. Conceived by the Virgin, who first in body and soul was purified by the Holy Spirit (for it was needful both that Childbearing should be honored, and that Virginity should receive a higher honor), He came forth then as God with that which He had assumed, One Person in two Natures, Flesh and Spirit, of which the latter deified the former. O new commingling; O strange conjunction; the Self-Existent comes into being, the Uncreated is created, That which cannot be contained is contained, by the intervention of an intellectual soul, mediating between the Deity and the corporality of the flesh. And He Who gives riches becomes poor, for He assumes the poverty of my flesh, that I may assume the richness of His Godhead. He that is full empties Himself, for He empties Himself of His glory for a short while, that I may have a share in His Fullness. What is the riches of His Goodness? What is this mystery that is around me? I had a share in the image; I did not keep it; He partakes of my flesh that He may both save the image and make the flesh immortal" (Oration 38, On Theophany).

Source: Ekklesiastiki Paremvasi, "Ἡ Χριστολογία τοῦ Ἁγίου Γρηγορίου τοῦ Θεολόγου", March 2005. Translated by John Sanidopoulos.

Circumcision of Christ Resource Page

Circumcision of Christ (Feast Day - January 1)

Verses

With Christ's circumcision, the law was cut off.
And with the law cut off, grace entered in.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 

Christ Came to Pass Through All the Ranks of the Priesthood



The following is taken from the Saying of the Desert Fathers.

A certain elder who counseled against fornication said the following:

“Be like a man who passes through a street of taverns, and who smells the odor of boiling meats, or the whiff of something which is being roasted; he who wishes enters into one of them and eats, and he who does not wish to do so smells the meats as he passes by and then goes on. Drive away then from yourself the fetid smell of evil thoughts, and stand up and pray, saying, ‘O Son of God, help me.’ The same thing is also to be said about other thoughts, for we are not the roots of the thoughts, but are those who strive against them.”

On the Lord's Passion, Death and Descent into Hades (St. John of Damascus)


An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith

By St. John of Damascus

Book 3

Chapter 25. Concerning the Appropriation.

It is to be observed that there are two appropriations: one that is natural and essential, and one that is personal and relative. The natural and essential one is that by which our Lord in His love for man took on Himself our nature and all our natural attributes, becoming in nature and truth man, and making trial of that which is natural: but the personal and relative appropriation is when any one assumes the person of another relatively, for instance, out of pity or love, and in his place utters words concerning him that have no connection with himself. And it was in this way that our Lord appropriated both our curse and our desertion, and such other things as are not natural: not that He Himself was or became such, but that He took upon Himself our personality and ranked Himself as one of us. Such is the meaning in which this phrase is to be taken: "Being made a curse for our sakes" (Gal. 3:15).

The Theological Crisis and Its Impact on Daily Ecclesiastical Life (6 of 6)



f) "The Prophetic, Royal and High Priestly Office of Christ"

In the Old Testament there are three different types of bearers of grace through whom God led His people, namely the Prophets, Kings and High Priests. Christ with His incarnation has the fullness of Grace as the Son of God in bodily form, as the Apostle Paul says: "For God was pleased to have all His fullness dwell in Him" (Col. 1:19), and "in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form" (Col. 2:9). Therefore He is a Prophet through His preaching, a King through His guidance, and a High Priest with His sacrifice and offering. This means that Christ has these three qualities/features, and they are united between them.

The Wisdom of God (2 of 4)



2. Churches that Bear the Name of Hagia Sophia

Because the Wisdom of God is Christ, the pre-incarnate Word of the Old Testament and the incarnate Word of the New Testament, this is why Christians built Sacred Temples to honor the Wisdom of God, calling them "Hagia Sophia" or "Holy Wisdom". This was not a female Martyr or Ascetic named Sophia, but Christ who is the Word of the Father.

George Florovsky writes that the first Temple in Constantinople dedicated to Hagia Sophia, was probably designed by Constantine the Great himself, but the building of it took place later and was completed and inaugurated in the year 360. It is not exactly known when this Temple was first given the name of Hagia Sophia. Yet this first Temple of Hagia Sophia subsequently became the largest Temple under Justinian.

The Wisdom of God (1 of 4)


On the Feast of Mid-Pentecost, 9 May 2012, Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos was invited to Cyprus by Archbishop Chrysostomos of Cyprus for the inauguration of the Church of God's Wisdom in Nicosia, Cyprus and delivered the homily, titled: "The Wisdom of God". The reason for the consecration being on Mid-Pentecost is because all temples consecrated to the Wisdom of God are traditionally celebrated on Mid-Pentecost, which is the Feast of the Wisdom and Word of God, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, Jesus Christ.

By His Eminence Metropolitan Hierotheos
of Nafpaktos and Agiou Vlasiou

I wanted to warmly thank His Beatitude Archbishop Chrysostomos of Cyprus for the invitation to come to Cyprus today, on this important day of the feast of Mid-Pentecost, and deliver a talk on the theme "The Wisdom of God", in conjunction with the inauguration of the Church of God's Wisdom, which has been determined to be celebrated on the feast of Mid-Pentecost.

The Theotokos as the First to See the Risen Christ


By John Sanidopoulos

The Gospels and the tradition of the Church are pretty clear that two women first saw the risen Lord. We know one was Mary Magdalene who is exclusively spoken of in the Gospel of John, and the other we know was another Mary, but the identity of this Mary initially is not told. The tradition of the Fathers is clear that this Mary was the mother of Jesus, the Theotokos.

One way we know this is from the iconographic tradition of the Church, where two women are depicted together as being first witnesses of the risen Jesus. The woman in red (or sometimes blue), the traditional cloak color for the Theotokos, is the Virgin Mary, who is also sometimes depicted with her name engraved near her halo. This depiction goes back centuries, the earliest of which that we know of comes from a miniature of the Crucifixion and the Resurrection in the Rabbula Codex (Syria and Palestine, dated 586-587 A.D.). The first scene shows two women at the tomb and the second scene shows them at the feet of Christ. One of the women has a halo, which indicates that she is the Virgin Mary, just as she is depicted in the Crucifixion scene. These scenes became the standard iconography for the Sunday of the Holy Myrrhbearers during the Paschal season, and even flourished in the Middle Ages of the West as well.

Why Did Jesus Weep at the Tomb of Lazarus?


By His Eminence Metropolitan Seraphim of Kastoria

When interpreting the sacred texts of our Church, the God-bearing Fathers use the method of allegory. This method does not abolish the historical event, but it brings it to another level.

The Fathers use such reasoning without denying the historicity of the events, rather they are expressing their own experiences after reaching purification and illumination by the grace of the Holy Spirit. Hence they were able to infallibly interpret Holy Scripture and present the truths of our faith, which if we live them with our purified hearts then we will be given the ability to also experience them, thus giving us experiential participation in the Passion of Christ.

Saint Amphilochios, Bishop of Iconium, a close friend of Basil the Great and the Cappadocian Fathers of the Church, interprets the event of the resurrection of Lazarus by beginning with the following words: "Bring before us once again John the Evangelist. It is good to examine the first-fruits of the resurrection." Continuing his interpretation, he stands before an event which John the Evangelist specifically presents, and that is the tears of Jesus.

And Saint Amphilochios asks: "Why the need for tears, if You are about to raise him?"

Why then did Jesus weep?

The Circumcision of Christ and His Humanity


By Prof. Lambros Skontzos

The Incarnation of God the Word is not some abstract theoretical form, nor some fable of some imaginative myth writer, but a real event, which took place in a specific area and time (Gal. 4:4). The great feast of the Circumcision of the Lord reminds us of this great truth and stresses in particular the real human nature, which He voluntarily put on for the sake of our salvation.

Jesus Christ, the Wisdom of God


By Archimandrite Silouan Peponakis

The feast of Mid-Pentecost is a feast of great importance, on which Christ is celebrated as the Wisdom of God.

A broad face, formed with many highlights, with almost rugged features, and a general tendency to avoid the beautification of the Lord, make this stunning icon from the Museum of Byzantine Culture in Thessaloniki (image above). From its title, which is also the title of this article, it is speculated that the icon was originally in the Church of the Holy Wisdom of God in Thessaloniki, and that this church, like many churches, were modeled after the great Church of the Holy Wisdom of God (Hagia Sophia) in Constantinople.