Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



April 12, 2019

Who is the Author of the Akathist Hymn?


By John Sanidopoulos

The Akathist is a Kontakion, which is basically a homily set to poetry. This style of hymnography is mostly associated with Romanos the Melodist who lived at the end of the fifth to the mid-sixth century. We have no way of determining the exact date of its composition. When comparing the Akathist to the kontakia of the various hymnographers, it is most akin to that of Romanos the Melodist. For example, Romanos was interested in Christology, and the defense of the Orthodox view against the Monophysites, Nestorians, Arians, Docetists, Apollinarians and Manichaeans. The Akathist Hymn reflects this.

However, in some manuscripts the authorship is ascribed to Patriarch Sergios, or George Pisides, or Patriarch Germanos, or even Patriarch Photios. Only one manuscript ascribes it to Romanos, but this is in conjunction with Patriarch Sergios. One can only speculate who the author is, but it does seem to be someone who has mastered the style. Taking into account all the elements that constitute the greatness of the poem: power of expression, boldness of similes, perfect harmony of the lines and, above all, poetical vision, no other poet but Romanos could have been the author of the Akathist Hymn.

Romanos was the greatest of all hymn-writers, who flourished during the reign of Justinian. It was during the reign of Justinian that the School of Philosophy in Athens was closed down, in the year 529. The Akathist Hymn seems to suggest that it predates this closure. For example, in the seventeenth stanza, we read: "Rejoice, you who dissolve the word-webs of the Athenians." And in the eighteenth stanza, we read:

"Why do the Greeks boast and puff themselves up?
Why do they dream of Aratos, the thrice-accursed?
Why do they err after Plato?"

There is another factor that may prove the author of the Akathist Hymn to be Romanos. Byzantine Hymnographers either composed their poems in a new metre and to a new melody - these composition are called Idiomela - or to the metre and melody of other hymn-writers or former hymns of their own; the latter are called Prosomoia, and bear the rubric "To be sung to the melody of...". In Romanos' Kontakion on Joseph of Egypt, in Cod. Corsin. 366, the rubric reads: "To be sung to the melody of An Angel of the Highest Rank (Ἄγγελος πρωτοστάτης)." The words to this rubric refers to the beginning of the Akathist. We have no reason to doubt the rubric is authentic. Therefore, we see here Romanos referring to a former hymn of his, the Akathist Hymn. Since we know all the other hymn-writers to whom the Akathist is ascribed lived after him, we can be certain Romanos was referring to a former hymn that was his own.

The main and pretty much only argument against the authorship of Romanos is the Prooemium Τῇ ὑπερμάχῷ στρατηγῷ (O Champion General). This makes the hymn a Victory Hymn, which bolsters the claim that the Akathist was written after a seige against Constantinople, as the Synaxarion suggests. However, evidence suggests the Prooemium was added at a later date, and probably written by either Patriarch Sergios or Patriarch Gregory and added to the Akathist, which was chanted following the victory over a certain siege. No one believes the entire Akathist was written the day the siege was over, but that it preexisted. And since stylistically the Prooemium does not fit the rest of the Akathist, and it could have indeed been written in a day, its later addition makes perfect sense, and further adds to the argument that Romanos was indeed the author of the Akathist Hymn, a hymn of praise to the Most Holy Theotokos, who appeared to Romanos in a vision and gifted him with the ability to write heaven-worthy hymns and chant them angelically.


BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER