Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



May 5, 2009

Movie Review: "Let the Right One In" (2008)

 
LET THE RIGHT ONE IN is a Swedish film directed by Thomas Alfredson and based on a best selling Swedish novel by John Ajvide Lindovist. The title is based on the song by Morrissey "Let The Right One Slip In". 
 
It’s February 1982, in a suburb of Stockholm. It’s a dark, cold, desolate environment, and the individuals who live there, cloaked in loneliness and alcohol, are already on the edge of madness. Oskar is 12 and bullied; he is obsessed by fantasies of violent, bloody revenge. He falls in love with a mysterious girl named Eli who moves in next door; later, he realises she’s a very old vampire trapped in a 12 year old body, responsible for some horrible local murders. This film came out around the same time of Twilight; critics said see Let The Right One In instead if you're seeking a vampire fix. The vampire is not the sanitised, eroticised creature of recent culture, but rather resembles those in early folkloric tales – she smells and is more animal than ethereal. It is one of the best horror movies of the past few years and ranks high among the greatest and most compelling vampire flicks of all time. Though I didn't watch it till about a month ago when the DVD was released, the actual release took place in 2008 and ranks in my personal top ten list for best films of 2008. The film is powerful on the atmospheric level. Like 30 Days Of Night released earlier the same year, there is a certain beauty on film when darkness, cold, snow and blood mix. The depressing and lonely environment adds to the creepiness and claustrophobic horror of the scenes depicted. Most impressive of all is the cast. The relationship between Oskar and Eli elicits very strong emotions; ones that are both disturbing yet sympathetic. Both seem to be so young and innocent and you feel a certain relief that these two lonely isolated children found each other. There is a deep romance and chemistry between them, and you feel the urge to cheer them on in their venture to be together forever against all others. The two young actors are powerfully strange, with a tangible connection; particularly striking is a scene where Oskar refuses to invite the vampire into his flat but she enters anyway and starts bleeding out of her eyes; he then lets her in, literally and metaphor­ically. However there are subtle nuances that reveal something more disturbing and creepy is going on that is difficult to capture upon the first viewing of the film, and it leaves you wondering why does the film evoke such mixed feelings. 
 
As with all the great stories involving vampires, the story juxtaposes selfishness with selflessness. This is the great internal struggle. The compelling love story of Oskar and Eli ultimately is a very selfish relationship, as most love stories are these days. The love they share is very isolated from the world. In their mind they know the love they feel is right, and this justifies the horrible wrongs they commit against everyone else. Inside they feel a deep anger against the world, a world that isolated them and failed to accept them. There is no forgiveness, no mercy, no love and no salvation outside of their relationship to one another. 
 
Lest we think the children are the only victims of this story, we must force ourselves to see the adults are victims as well. They seem to be powerless and lonely themselves, who are alcoholics, unemployed or working minimum wage jobs. Though everyone is the victim of the tale, both the adults and children are presented with a moral choice of victimizing others. It is the children in this story that choose to victimize, though in many ways it also shows how they learn to victimize from the adults. The story ends with a final gruesome battle between the bullies and Eli that depicts a significant baptism scene of Oskar which leaves the viewer with many questions on how to interpret it. Is it a baptism of violence or a baptism of love? Or maybe it just shows a cathartic element to the bloodbath.
 
It wasn't until I did some research into the book that I fully discovered the disturbing morality of the tale. Shockingly we learn that Eli is not a girl, but a castrated boy (hence the omnisexual name). This is alluded to in the film when the private parts of Eli are quickly shown with scarring and earlier Eli asks Oskar if she will love him even if he finds out she is not a girl. The fact that Oskar's father is a homosexual alludes to the acceptability Oskar shows Eli when he notices Eli is not a she but a he. Furthermore, there is an element of paedophilia to the tale making it sort of a vampiric Lolita story, if you consider the fact that Eli is a decades old man in love with a real 12 year old boy. She seems to learn this from her handler who is clearly a pedophile who she has a sort of love/hate relationship with. Thus, the sexuality of the children is something learned from the adults in their lives. It also shows the manipulation Eli uses with Oskar who sees in him a repacement to her dead handler. Eli sees nothing wrong with genuinely loving Oskar while knowingly using and manipulating him for her own ends. All this adds to the duality and complexity of the film that leaves many layers to think about.
 

 
 

BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER