Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



February 15, 2020

The Mystery of the Apostle Onesimus


We read about Onesimus in Saint Paul's Epistle to Philemon, where we read that he had fled to Paul while he was in prison probably in Rome to escape punishment for a theft of which he was accused. After hearing the gospel from Paul, Onesimus converted to Christianity. Paul, having earlier converted Philemon to Christianity, sought to reconcile the two by writing the letter to Philemon. Some believe Onesimus was a servant of Philemon, and since Philemon was converted by Paul, Onesimus fled to Paul to mediate on his behalf.

We also come across the name Onesimus in Colossians 4, where we read that he accompanied Tychicus to Colossae. Whether or not these are one and the same person is unknown, but it is usually assumed they are.

According to the tradition of the Orthodox Church, the Apostle Onesimus is said to have died a martyr's death soon after the Apostle Paul was martyred, in the mid to late 60's A.D., in Potioli, Italy by having his legs beaten and crushed.

However, some believe he may also be the same Onesimus named by Ignatius of Antioch in his Epistle to the Ephesians as the Bishop of Ephesus, which would put Onesimus's death closer to 95 A.D. or even as late as 110.

Here we have the possibility of either one, two or three men named Onesimus. It is almost impossible to determine what is the truth, hence the mystery, but if we rely on tradition then it seems unlikely that the Onesimus mentioned by Paul is the same as the Onesimus mentioned by Ignatius. After all, it was a fairly common name at the time, and there is no reason to assume that everyone named Onesimus in the first century was the same person. But this is what New Testament scholar F.F. Bruce says:

“Why then should one connect the Onesimus who was the bishop of Ephesus about 110 with the Onesimus in the book of Philemon? Because Ignatius in his letter to the church at Ephesus shows himself familiar with the epistle to Philemon. It is one of the rare places in patristic literature where the language of our epistle is clearly echoed. Not only so, but the part of Ignatius’ letter to Ephesus where the language of Philemon is echoed is the part in which the bishop is mentioned in the first six chapters fourteen times.”

Going further than that, New Testament scholars like F. F. Bruce have suggested that it is Onesimus who was instrumental in collecting and preserving letters written by Paul, which were collected in the New Testament.

However, there are reasons to doubt the speculations of F.F. Bruce. First, tradition seems to contradict his claim. Second, Ignatius may have referred to the Epistle to Philemon in his letter only because the current Bishop of Ephesus Onesimus reminded him of the Onesimus mentioned by Paul, and therefore it was done as a rhetorical device. Third, Ignatius never associated or connected Onesimus of Ephesus with the Onesimus that was a disciple of Paul. Fourth, there is no tradition linking Onesimus with being a Bishop of Ephesus.

The mystery remains a mystery and one could only speculate what the truth is.



BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER