Having entered the Christmas season, we ask those who find the work of the Mystagogy Resource Center beneficial to them to help us continue our work with a generous financial gift as you are able. As an incentive, we are offering the following booklet.

In 1909 the German philosopher Arthur Drews wrote a book called "The Myth of Christ", which New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman has called "arguably the most influential mythicist book ever produced," arguing that Jesus Christ never existed and was simply a myth influenced by more ancient myths. The reason this book was so influential was because Vladimir Lenin read it and was convinced that Jesus never existed, thus justifying his actions in promoting atheism and suppressing the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union. Moreover, the ideologues of the Third Reich would go on to implement the views of Drews to create a new "Aryan religion," viewing Jesus as an Aryan figure fighting against Jewish materialism. 

Due to the tremendous influence of this book in his time, George Florovsky viewed the arguments presented therein as very weak and easily refutable, which led him to write a refutation of this text which was published in Russian by the YMCA Press in Paris in 1929. This apologetic brochure titled "Did Christ Live? Historical Evidence of Christ" was one of the first texts of his published to promote his Neopatristic Synthesis, bringing the patristic heritage to modern historical and cultural conditions. With the revival of these views among some in our time, this text is as relevant today as it was when it was written. 

Never before published in English, it is now available for anyone who donates at least $20 to the Mystagogy Resource Center upon request (please specify in your donation that you want the book). Thank you.



April 14, 2019

What Was the Occupation of St. Mary of Egypt Before Her Repentance?


This question is a trick question to see who pays attention to details. I know most people would answer the question above with words like "prostitute", "harlot" or even "sex worker". Well, answers like this would be wrong. This is what most people assume was the occupation of Mary of Egypt before her repentance. But in the Life of Mary of Egypt she specifically says:

"I was like a fire of public debauchery. And it was not for the sake of gain -- here I speak the pure truth. Often when they wished to pay me, I refused the money. I acted in this way so as to make as many men as possible to try to obtain me, doing free of charge what gave me pleasure. Do not think that I was rich and that was the reason why I did not take money. I lived by begging, often by spinning flax, but I had an insatiable desire and an irrepressible passion for lying in filth. This was life to me."

So based on the above information, her occupation, from which she made money, was begging and spinning flax. The only time we are told she may have taken money for sex was when she was on her way to Jerusalem, when she manipulated men to pay for her way there. In fact, that she had to resort to doing this, proves that she was a poor woman who made very little money. Imagine how rich she would have been if she did get paid for sex!

Below are some photos of what it may have looked like when Mary spun flax:







BECOME A PATREON OR PAYPAL SUBSCRIBER