MYSTAGOGY

The Weblog Of John Sanidopoulos

BannerFans.com
  • Home
  • SAINTS & FEASTS
  • RESOURCES
  • BOOKSTORE
  • ABOUT
Loading...

MYSTAGOGY

MYSTAGOGY
My Photo
J.Sanidopoulos
This weblog offers insights and analysis on various matters of life and thought from a 21st century Orthodox Christian perspective, among other things.
View my complete profile
http://www.facebookloginhut.com/facebook-login/ http://www.facebookloginhut.com/facebook-login/

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (324)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (67)
    • ►  March (77)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (102)
  • ►  2012 (1047)
    • ►  December (99)
    • ►  November (59)
    • ►  October (69)
    • ►  September (58)
    • ►  August (74)
    • ►  July (116)
    • ►  June (121)
    • ►  May (125)
    • ►  April (138)
    • ►  March (96)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (89)
  • ▼  2011 (1427)
    • ►  December (60)
    • ►  November (65)
    • ►  October (84)
    • ►  September (63)
    • ►  August (107)
    • ►  July (40)
    • ▼  June (133)
      • The Twelve Apostles: Timid Men Who Conquered the W...
      • Ecumenical Patriarch Blesses "The Great Orthodox C...
      • The Glorification of 1241 New Martyrs of Naousa
      • Hieromartyr Cyril Lukaris Celebrated By Patriarcha...
      • Pan-Orthodox Consensus on Same-Sex Marriage
      • Documentary Shows Violation of Civil Liberties Thr...
      • Siberian Wildfires Combatted By Crosses and Icons
      • Mormon Image Campaign To Be Run Across America
      • The Holy Foremost Apostles Peter and Paul
      • Sixth Century Fresco of St. Paul Discovered In Rom...
      • Little Known Yet Interesting Facts
      • St. Barbaros the Myrrh-Gusher and Wonderworker
      • Hear Ye, Hear Ye!
      • The Cave Church of All Saints In Nafplio
      • Video: The Russian Orthodox Mission In Antarctica
      • The Responsibility of Being A Temple of the Holy S...
      • The Love of God Is A Gift of the Holy Spirit
      • "Grieve Not the Holy Spirit of God"
      • Synaxarion For the Sunday of All Saints
      • Why Go To Church When I Can Just Pray At Home?
      • Building Churches Builds Hope In Bulgaria, Says Pr...
      • Saint Leontios the Myrrhgusher (+ 1605)
      • Milos To Be Consecrated A "Sacred Island" In the F...
      • The Shrine of the Apostle Paul In Samothrace
      • "Scientists Find the Gene For" ...?
      • The Holy Spirit Makes Us Children of God
      • Do Biblical and Pagan Parallels Debunk Biblical Tr...
      • Two New Books Available Exclusively Here!
      • Saint Isauros the Martyr and His Church In Kerkyra...
      • Saint Gregory the Theologian To His Own Soul
      • The Spirit of the World and the Spirit of God
      • The Unity of the Church and the Satanic Trap of Sc...
      • How Russians Survived Militant Atheism To Embrace ...
      • The Renewal of the Universe
      • Hieromartyr Hermogenes, Bishop of Tobolsk (+ 1918)...
      • Holy Scripture Written By Holy Men of God
      • Objections To the Gospels Answered
      • The Origin and Revelation of the Church
      • Saint Augustine, Bishop of Hippo
      • Photos: 25,000 Attend Velikoretsky Crucession
      • The Testimony of the Spirit of God
      • Human/Ape Common Ancestry: Following the Evidence
      • Pentecost Celebrated on Holy Zion in Jerusalem
      • Distinguishing Scientific Evidence From Philosophi...
      • St. Justin Popovich: Orthodoxy and the Theory of E...
      • The Holy Prophet Elisha
      • Serb Students React To Fr. Theodore Zisis and on t...
      • Response To Slanders Against St. Nikolai Velimirov...
      • Are Christians Narrow Minded?
      • The Holy Spirit As Comforter
      • Celebrating Pentecost Between Heaven and Earth In ...
      • Video: Pentecost Vespers At the Holy Sepulchre
      • Video: Elisha the Prophet and the Syrian Army
      • The Monastery of Panagia Faneromeni in Lefkada
      • A Miracle of Saint Onouphrios in Kerkyra
      • Sixth Century Byzantine Church Unearthed In Acre, ...
      • Saint Onouphrios of Koronisia
      • Synaxarion For the Monday of the Holy Spirit
      • Kumaré: A True Film About a False Prophet
      • Saint Iakovos, Who Was Deluded To Worship Satan
      • Russian Patriarch Celebrates Pentecost At Holy Tri...
      • Giver of Life: The Holy Spirit In Our Daily Experi...
      • St. Theodore the Studite: On Holy Pentecost
      • Synaxarion For the Sunday of Pentecost
      • Saint Barnabas the Wonderworker of Vasa
      • The Icon of Axion Estin: History and Miracles
      • Video: Orthodoxy In China
      • The Holy New Martyrs of China (+ 1900)
      • The Grateful and the Ungrateful In the Sight of Go...
      • Saint John (Maximovitch), Metropolitan of Tobolsk,...
      • Serbian Orthodox Under Scrutiny Over Mladic
      • Synaxis of All Saints of Siberia
      • Documentary: Where Heaven Falls Prey To Thieves
      • Serbian Church Will Not Invite Pope To Nis
      • Moscow Bans Church From Feeding the Hungry
      • Video: Recordings of Elder Porphyrios
      • Dave Gahan of Depeche Mode A Convert to Orthodoxy
      • Hypatia's Murder and the Innocence of Saint Cyril
      • Saint Cyril, Patriarch of Alexandria
      • A Dissertation On Cyril of Alexandria's Views On t...
      • Video: The Prayer of a Bird
      • The Restoration of a 14th Century Psalter
      • The Division Between Theologians and Non-Theologia...
      • The Myth of a Postmodern Era
      • An Emotional Sharon Stone Meets the Patriarch of G...
      • Metropolitan of Patras: Keep the Traditions, Or We...
      • Orthodox Christianity In Kosovo Lives In Constant ...
      • From the Sacred Ascension To Holy Pentecost
      • Items Now Available Exclusively Through Mystagogy
      • Saint Theophanes the New Martyr of Constantinople ...
      • The Relics and Blood-Flowing Icon of St. Theodore ...
      • The Ark of Salvation and the Pirate Ship of Zealot...
      • Chronology of the Life of Saint Panagis Basias
      • The Icon of Christ Which Flowed Blood and Myrrh
      • The Mystery of the Eucharist Is Not A Symbol
      • Saint Daniel of Scetis
      • The Church of Panagia of Finikia and Lord Byron
      • Saint Dionysios the Wise, Patriarch of Constantino...
      • St. Luke the Surgeon: On Science and Religion
      • A Metropolis Is Robbed While A Metropolitan Slept ...
      • First Russian Church In Arabian Peninsula Goes Up
      • Five New Dioceses Created In Russia To Improve Chu...
      • Video: N.T. Wright On the Western Depiction of Hel...
      • The Poisonous Songs of Arius
      • Sociologist: Every 5 Minutes a Christian Is Martyr...
      • One Man's Deprivation Is Another Man's Luxury
      • Elder Paisios: Ease of Life and Christianity Do No...
      • Synaxarion For the Sunday of the Holy Fathers
      • Is There A "Postpatristic" Theology?
      • An Ancient Christian Wedding In the Archdiocese of...
      • Saint Metrophanes, First Archbishop of Constantino...
      • Saint Sophia of Ainos, Mother of Orphans and Assis...
      • The Feast of Newly-Revealed Saints Zoticus, Atallu...
      • Update On Land Situation In Australia!
      • The Rise of "Militant Piety" In Russian Orthodoxy
      • The Triangle of Religious Tolerance in Sofia
      • G.K. Chesterton On the Christian View of Nature
      • Video: Ecumenical Patriarch In Ephesus and Alacati...
      • The Feast of the Ascension and Esphigmenou Monaste...
      • Lawrence Krauss Finds Empirical Evidence For God
      • The Ascension of Our Lord, God, and Savior Jesus C...
      • The Glorious Ascension of Our Lord and the Prayer ...
      • Righteous Martyr Pachomios the New (+ 1730)
      • Synaxis of Panagia Chrisopigi of Sifnos
      • The Holy Georgian Martyrs of Persia (+ 1616)
      • God is Without Form and Beyond Description
      • Video: The Iconography of the Fall of Constantinop...
      • Synaxarion For the Thursday of the Ascension
      • The Beneficial Tale of Metrios the Farmer
      • Saint Agapitus the Unmercenary of the Kiev Caves
      • The "Ark" of Elder Gabriel In Dolous of Mani
      • The Holy Monastery of Saint Nicholas of the Cats
      • The Churches of Kizhi: Russia's Sacred Island
    • ►  May (161)
    • ►  April (198)
    • ►  March (174)
    • ►  February (161)
    • ►  January (181)
  • ►  2010 (2462)
    • ►  December (221)
    • ►  November (211)
    • ►  October (149)
    • ►  September (200)
    • ►  August (187)
    • ►  July (209)
    • ►  June (170)
    • ►  May (199)
    • ►  April (236)
    • ►  March (240)
    • ►  February (227)
    • ►  January (213)
  • ►  2009 (874)
    • ►  December (160)
    • ►  November (124)
    • ►  October (140)
    • ►  September (116)
    • ►  August (86)
    • ►  July (97)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (49)

Topics

  • Abortion (1)
  • Alexandros Papadiamandis (1)
  • Almsgiving (4)
  • America (156)
  • Angels (52)
  • Anglicans (3)
  • Annunciation (2)
  • Anthony the Great (3)
  • Anthropology (23)
  • Antiochian Archdiocese of America (10)
  • Apocrypha (1)
  • Apologetics (81)
  • Apostles and Early Church (164)
  • Art (40)
  • Athanasius the Great (3)
  • Atheism-Agnosticism-Skepticism (205)
  • Augustine of Hippo (4)
  • Balkans and Russia (61)
  • Basil the Great (3)
  • Bible (41)
  • Bible Difficulties (1)
  • Biblical and Christian Archaeology (11)
  • Biblical and Christian Archeology (94)
  • Biblical Criticism (30)
  • Bioethics (1)
  • Byzantine Music (1)
  • C.S. Lewis (2)
  • Calendar Issue (2)
  • Canon Law (36)
  • Catholicism and Papacy (158)
  • Celtic Saints (1)
  • Christian Living (171)
  • Christology (63)
  • Church and Society (1)
  • Church History (49)
  • Climate Change (1)
  • Conspiracies (93)
  • Constantine the Great (5)
  • Coptic Church (44)
  • Cross (91)
  • Cults (83)
  • Cyril Loukaris (1)
  • Demetrios of Thessaloniki (2)
  • Demonology (7)
  • Desert Fathers (12)
  • Divine Liturgy (8)
  • Divorce (5)
  • Documentaries (9)
  • Dormition Fast (35)
  • Ecclesiology (84)
  • Ecumenical Patriarchate (158)
  • Ecumenical Synods (7)
  • Ecumenism (105)
  • Elder Aimilianos of Simonopetra (2)
  • Elder Cleopa of Romania (2)
  • Elder Ephraim Katounakiotis (2)
  • Elder Epiphanios Theodoropoulos (2)
  • Elder Eusebius Yiannakakis (1)
  • Elder Iakovos of Evia (1)
  • Elder Paisios the Athonite (32)
  • Elder Porphyrios (7)
  • Elder Sophrony of Essex (6)
  • Entrance of the Theotokos (2)
  • Ephraim the Syrian (2)
  • Eschatology/Death (181)
  • Ethical and Moral Issues (70)
  • Europe (85)
  • Events (14)
  • Family and Parish (81)
  • Famous People (6)
  • Fasting (5)
  • Feasts of the Church (95)
  • Fr. George Florovsky (4)
  • Fr. George Metallinos (1)
  • Fr. John Romanides (7)
  • Fr. Seraphim Rose (1)
  • Freemasonry (1)
  • Funny (48)
  • George the Great Martyr (6)
  • Globalization (1)
  • God (69)
  • Gothic and Horror (38)
  • Great Lent (9)
  • Great Lent and Holy Week (333)
  • Greece and Greeks (212)
  • Greek Archdiocese of America (GOA) (66)
  • Gregory of Nyssa (1)
  • Gregory Palamas (9)
  • Gregory the Theologian (2)
  • Hagia Sophia (7)
  • Halki Seminary (2)
  • Halloween (5)
  • Happiness (1)
  • Health (1)
  • Health and Creation (138)
  • Heresy (100)
  • Holidays (17)
  • Holy Light (1)
  • Holy Matrimony (2)
  • Holy Mysteries (Sacraments) (142)
  • Holy Unction (1)
  • Holy Week (27)
  • Homosexuality (1)
  • Iconography (291)
  • Isaac the Syrian (3)
  • John Chrysostom (6)
  • John Climacus (2)
  • John the Baptist (10)
  • Judging (1)
  • Justin Popovic (1)
  • Lay Holiness (2)
  • Literature (28)
  • Literature and Book Reviews (89)
  • Liturgics (93)
  • Logic / Reason (1)
  • Luke of Crimea (1)
  • Mariology (273)
  • Marital and Relationship Issues (97)
  • Maximus the Confessor (2)
  • Maximus the Greek (2)
  • Medieval History and Theology (58)
  • Meteora (3)
  • Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos (20)
  • Middle East (54)
  • Miracles (449)
  • Missions (104)
  • Modern Saints and Elders (535)
  • Modernity (30)
  • Monasticism (129)
  • Monk Moses the Athonite (6)
  • Moral Stories (2)
  • Moscow Patriarchate (1)
  • Mothers (2)
  • Mount Athos (310)
  • Movies (132)
  • Music (111)
  • My Family and Friends (25)
  • My Writings (1)
  • N.T. - Colossians (1)
  • N.T. - John (2)
  • N.T. - Luke (1)
  • N.T. - Mark (6)
  • N.T. - Matthew (4)
  • N.T. - Revelation (1)
  • N.T. 1 Corinthians (1)
  • N.T. 1 Timothy (1)
  • N.T. Hebrews (1)
  • N.T. Luke (3)
  • Nationalism (6)
  • Nativity and Theophany (234)
  • Nektarios of Aegina (6)
  • Neomartys Under Turks (11)
  • New England (19)
  • New Martyrs Under Turks (1)
  • New Testament (181)
  • New Testament Exegesis (7)
  • Newly-Revealed Saints (3)
  • Nicholas of Myra (7)
  • Nicolae Steinhardt (3)
  • Nikephoros the Leper (1)
  • Nikodemos the Hagiorite (2)
  • Nikolai Velimirovich (8)
  • O.T. - Genesis (1)
  • Old Testament (150)
  • Old Testament Exegesis (9)
  • Oriental Orthodox (2)
  • Orthodox Church In America (OCA) (13)
  • Orthodox Converts (98)
  • Orthodox Diaspora (10)
  • Orthodox Extremism (149)
  • Orthodox Theologians (66)
  • Orthodoxy (39)
  • Orthodoxy in Abkhazia (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Africa (63)
  • Orthodoxy in Albania (13)
  • Orthodoxy in America (142)
  • Orthodoxy in Armenia (18)
  • Orthodoxy in Asia (46)
  • Orthodoxy in Asia Minor (171)
  • Orthodoxy in Australia (6)
  • Orthodoxy in Bulgaria (99)
  • Orthodoxy in Crete (8)
  • Orthodoxy in Cyprus (100)
  • Orthodoxy in Czech Republic (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Estonia (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Ethiopia (8)
  • Orthodoxy in Finland (1)
  • Orthodoxy in France (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Georgia (71)
  • Orthodoxy in Germany (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Greece (454)
  • Orthodoxy In Holy Land (21)
  • Orthodoxy In Israel (140)
  • Orthodoxy in Italy (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Kazakhstan (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Latin America (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Lebanon (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Macedonia (16)
  • Orthodoxy in Mainland Greece (6)
  • Orthodoxy in Moldava (4)
  • Orthodoxy in Poland (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Romania (86)
  • Orthodoxy in Russia (414)
  • Orthodoxy in Serbia (140)
  • Orthodoxy in Syria (5)
  • Orthodoxy in the Cyclades (4)
  • Orthodoxy in the Dodecanese (11)
  • Orthodoxy in the Ionian Islands (3)
  • Orthodoxy in the Saronic Islands (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Ukraine (59)
  • Orthodoxy in Uzbekistan (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Western Europe (73)
  • Ottoman Occupation (7)
  • Paganism and the New Age Movement (98)
  • Paranormal and the Occult (197)
  • Pascha and the Pentecostarion (249)
  • Patriarchate of Alexandria (1)
  • Patriarchate of Antioch (5)
  • Patriarchate of Russia (1)
  • Patristic Writings (16)
  • Patristics (325)
  • Personhood (1)
  • Philanthropy (9)
  • Philosophy (82)
  • Photios Kontoglou (3)
  • Photis Kontoglou (1)
  • Pneumatology (3)
  • Podcast (2)
  • Politics (142)
  • Polls (2)
  • Pop Culture (54)
  • Postmodernism (6)
  • Prayer (3)
  • Prayer / Fasting / Alms (159)
  • Priesthood (8)
  • Prison Ministry (6)
  • Prophecies (56)
  • Protestantism (119)
  • Psychology (73)
  • Religion (85)
  • Religion: Buddhism (19)
  • Religion: Hinduism (40)
  • Religion: Islam (184)
  • Religion: Jews and Judaism (57)
  • Repentance and Confession (3)
  • Roman (Byzantine) Empire (201)
  • Romiosini (34)
  • Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (ROCOR) (6)
  • Saint Nicholas (4)
  • Saints (847)
  • Saints of Africa (1)
  • Saints of America (3)
  • Saints of Crete (8)
  • Saints of Georgia (4)
  • Saints of Ionian Islands (8)
  • Saints of Lesvos (1)
  • Saints of Mainland Greece (15)
  • Saints of Mount Athos (9)
  • Saints of Patmos (1)
  • Saints of Romania (3)
  • Saints of Russia (8)
  • Saints of Scotland (2)
  • Saints of Serbia (4)
  • Saints of the Cyclades (2)
  • Saints of the Dodecanese (1)
  • Saints of the Holy Lnd (1)
  • Saints of Ukraine (5)
  • Scandal (56)
  • Science (2)
  • Science-Intelligent Design-Darwinism (249)
  • Secularism (97)
  • Seraphim of Sarov (2)
  • Sexual and Gender Issues (107)
  • Shrines and Relics (564)
  • Soteriology (80)
  • Spiritual Fatherhood (4)
  • Spirituality (220)
  • Sports (20)
  • sShrines and Relics (1)
  • St. Cyril Loukaris (1)
  • St. John of Kronstadt (1)
  • st. John the Baptist (2)
  • St. John the Russian (1)
  • St. Luke of Simferopol (1)
  • St. Maximus the Confessor (1)
  • St. Nektarios (2)
  • St. Nikodemos the Hagiorite (1)
  • St. Nikolai Velimirovich (3)
  • Strange (36)
  • Sts. Bartholomew and John (1)
  • Substance Issues (14)
  • Symeon the New Theologian (3)
  • Television and Media (45)
  • Television and Media. (1)
  • Theodicy/Evil/Suffering (84)
  • Theology (98)
  • Theophilos of Campania (1)
  • Theotokos Icons (17)
  • Tradition (62)
  • Triodion (8)
  • UFO's and Alien Life (2)
  • Uniates (6)
  • v (1)
  • Vice and Sin (111)
  • video (1)
  • Videos (80)
  • Violence-Crime-Persecution (158)
  • Virtue (117)
  • Youth Ministry (105)

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
All Comments
Atom
All Comments

Visitor Map
Create your own visitor map!

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

The Origin and Revelation of the Church


By Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos

I. Origin and Revelation of the Church

Through the centuries there have appeared many heretical teachings which distorted the revealed truth, and which the holy Fathers confronted "with the sling stone of the Spirit", that is to say, by the power of the Holy Spirit. And this is so because the holy Fathers were the bearers of the pure Tradition of the Church.

Among these heresies are those of Arianism, the Pneumatomachs who fought against the Spirit, the Nestorians, the Monophysites, the Monothelites, the Iconoclasts, etc. All these heresies refer chiefly to the Person of Christ, but also to that of the Holy Spirit, and of course they disturb the foundations of man's salvation. For if Christ is not consubstantial with the Father, but is God's first creature, and if the Holy Spirit is not true God, man's salvation is put in doubt, the possibility of deification is cut off.

Later, during the fourteenth century yet another heresy appeared, which was expressed by Barlaam and based on rationalism. If Barlaam's heretical teaching had prevailed, the method of the Orthodox way towards deification, which is hesychasm, would in fact have ended in agnosticism.

The question being asked is whether there are heresies today as well. The answer is not hard to find, because all of us are being made witnesses of the fact that there are indeed heretics now, descendants of the great heretics, and there are heretical teachings being expressed, perhaps not deliberately, by some who believe, among other things, that they are really members of the Church of Christ. And indeed all of us in our ignorance and lack of learning, may have some erroneous views about God and the way of salvation, but we must struggle never to become heresiarchs or descendants of the great heretics who have appeared in the history of the Church.

Besides, all the heretics were members of the Church for a time, even Clergy, and were active in it. The Apostle Paul's prophecy applies here: "Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after themselves" (Acts 20:30).

All the heresies distort ecclesiology as well. Since the Church is the Body of Christ, every alteration in the teaching about Christ, about the Holy Spirit, about the way to man's salvation also has ecclesiological consequences.

It can be said that if there is a great heresy today, it is the so-called ecclesiological heresy. And this should be confronted by the Pastors of the Church. There is great confusion today about what the Church is and who are its true members. We confuse or identify the Church with other human Traditions, we think that the Church is fragmented and split up, and furthermore, we are ignorant of the Church's way of salvation. Thus it is in confusion about this great theme.

In the chapters to follow we shall attempt to examine the subject of the Church from different angles, and we shall try to see what the holy Fathers say about the Church. I think that this will help us to acquire the genuine mind of the Orthodox Church, which is essential for our salvation.

1. Etymology of the word "Ekklesia" (Church)

But before I proceed to elaborate the subject of the "origin and revelation of the Church", I would like us to take a look at the etymology of the word "Ekklesia", because it will help us to understand better what is going to be said further on.

The word 'Ekklesia' derives from the verb meaning 'to call out' 'call', 'call together', 'gather together'. Thus 'Church' means a gathering of people, a congregation.

We can also find the word in this meaning in ancient Greece with reference, for example, to the 'ekklesia' of a municipality, a gathering of the citizens to discuss various concerns which they had.

Also in holy Scripture, in both the Old and New Testaments, there is repeated reference to the 'Ekklesia' as an assembly. The phrases 'ekklesia of saints', 'ekklesia of laity' etc. , are often used in the Old Testament. But in the New Testament we also have abundant use of the word with a deeper content, since through the incarnation of Christ the Church is not a gathering of people, but the Body of Christ. Thus it acquires a deeper meaning. I would like to cite a few examples.

Christ said to the Apostle Peter, who confessed His divinity: "You are Peter, and on this rock I will build My Church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it" (Matt. 16"18). The rock ('petra') on which the Church is supported is the confession that Christ is the Son of God. The Apostle Paul repeatedly speaks of the Church as the Body of Christ. This passage from the letter to the Ephesians is characteristic: "And He put all things under His feet, and gave Him to be head over all things to the Church, which is His Body, the fullness of Him Who fills all in all" (Eph. 1:22-23). The members, the Christians who make up the membership of a concrete eucharistic community, are also characterised as the Church. The Church possesses the whole truth, because the whole revelation of God has been given to it. The Apostle Paul says: "Church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth" (1 Tim. 3:15).

The word `Church' is also used in these meanings in the teaching of the holy Fathers and in the Worship. According to St. Cyril of Jerusalem, it is called the Church "because it calls forth and assembles together all men". And St. John Chrysostom says characteristically "in the multitude of the faithful, the Church". On another subject I shall be developing further what the multitude of the faithful means. In any case I must call to mind here the teaching of St. John Chrysostom that the Church is not a wall and a roof, but living and life.

The Church is presented in many liturgical texts as a gathering, and especially as a eucharistic place, because the Eucharist is the deepest expression of the Church. I would like us to look at a characteristic passage from the Liturgy of the apostolic era as it has been preserved in the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles. At the end of the Eucharist when the Celebrant of the eucharistic gathering took the bread into his hands, he prayed: "We thank Thee, our Father, for the life and knowledge which Thou gavest us through Thy Son Jesus". And then he spoke an amazing prayer "Just as this fraction was scattered over the granaries and, gathered together, became one, so may Thy Church be gathered from the ends of the earth into thy kingdom". The bringing together of many grains of wheat and the preparation of the bread is an image pointing to the gathering of all the faithful into the Kingdom of God.

Among the expressions which are to be found in the liturgical texts and show exactly what the Church is, there is also the expression that the Church is "a holy people" or "communion of saints". The people of God is not only the Clergy or only the laity, but the unity of Clergy, monks and laity, and this unity is in Christ. `In Christ' means that members of the Church are all those who are united with Christ, all who are actually members of the Body of Christ through the sacramental and ascetic life, all who are baptised and confirmed in the faith, according to the teaching of St. Symeon the New Theologian.

This unity is shown clearly on the holy paten. In the middle there is the lamb of God, Christ Himself, on His right the portion of the Theotokos and on his left the portions of the saints, and in front the Bishop of the local Church with the living and those who lie asleep whom the priest mentions during the proskomidi. St. Symeon of Thessaloniki, speaking of the holy paten, says: "God among gods who are deified by Him Who is God by nature". Christ is God by nature and the saints are deified by grace through Him Who is God by nature. The assembly of the faithful is expressed once more during the Sacrament of the divine Eucharist.

I shall not concern myself further with this point here, because the subject of who are the true members of the Church will concern us in other sections and other chapters.

2. Origin and revelation of the Church

Many of us have the notion that the Church was created on the day of Pentecost, that is to say, when the Holy Spirit descended into the hearts of the Apostles. And of course we could say that Pentecost is the birthday of the Church from the point of view that it was then that the Church became the Body of Christ. It acquired substance. However, the beginning and existence of the Church is to be found in the time before Pentecost.

Professor John Karmiris states that there are three phases in the emergence of the Church. The first is the creation of the angels and men, the second is the life of Adam in Paradise, but also the period of the Old Testament, and the third phase of the Church is the incarnation of Christ. Indeed the full revelation of the Church will take place at the Second Coming of Christ

Let us look more analytically at these periods of the Church, for then in some way we can grasp the mystery of the Church and gain a deeper awareness of our being and scope.

a) The beginning of the Church

It is a teaching of the holy Fathers that with the creation of the angels we have the emergence of the first Church. And it can be seen in the writings of the Fathers of the Church that the angels too are members of the Church. Moreover, God the Father is the creator of "all things visible and invisible". Among the invisible are listed the angels, who sing in praise of God. In the book of Job this witness is preserved: "When the stars were born all the angels in a loud voice sang in praise of me" (Job 38:7). Thus, before the creation of the sensible world there were angels, who sang in praise of God for the creation. And, to be sure, this means that the angels were the first to be created by God.

The fact that the angels are members of the Church, since they sing in praise of God, appears in many troparia. I would like to mention one of these: "By Thy Cross, O Christ, one flock came into being, of angels and men, and one Church: heaven and earth rejoice; O Lord, glory to Thee". Angels and men belong to the same Flock, to the same Church after the incarnation of Christ. But this means that this unity also existed in the life before the fall. In the teaching of the holy Fathers it is clear that the `last things' are like the first and like those in between, because we cannot speak of eschatology apart from the life of man before the fall and apart from the deification of the saints already even before the Second Coming of Christ. Besides, according to the teaching of St. Gregory Palamas and other saints, the vision of the uncreated Light is the substance of the good things to come, this very Kingdom of God.

In Holy Scripture it is taught repeatedly that the angels constitute the first church. The Apostle Paul writing to the Hebrews says: "You have come to Mount Zion to the heavenly Jerusalem, the city of the living God. You have come to thousands upon thousands of angels in joyful assembly" (Heb. 12:22-23).

Thus the first Church, of which the angels were members, was spiritual. Clement of Rome says that the Church "from above, first, created spiritual before the sun and moon, and being spiritual, it was made manifest in the flesh of Christ". And St. John Chrysostom, urging silence during the services in the Temple, said with his characteristic expressiveness: "For the Church is not a barber's shop nor a perfume shop nor any other workshop in the markets, but a place of angels, a place of archangels, Kingdom of God, heaven itself". Chrysostom says further that the Christian should have in mind that in the Church, especially during divine Worship, there is a "choir of angels".

The angels are members of the Church because they too are created by God. Everything created is a creature, since it has a beginning. The angels not only were created by God, but they have also been perfected by the power and energy of the Holy Spirit. Therefore St. John of Damascus writes: "All the angels were created by the Word and were perfected by the sanctification of the Holy Spirit, taking part according to the standing and rank of their illumination and grace".

This view that the angels are members of the Church is very moving. It is a witness of the saints, because many of them, like St. Spyridon, saw angels worshipping with them during the Divine Liturgy. And this offers another dimension to the spiritual life.

The first Church was completed with the creation of man, Adam and Eve, and their being placed in Paradise. So it is that men sang praises to the glory of God with the angels.

b) The Church in the Old Testament

Adam and Eve lived an angelic life in Paradise. They were in the state of illumination of the nous, which is the first degree of the vision of God. They had communion with God.

According to the teaching of the holy Fathers, Paradise was tangible and intelligible. This is said by St. Gregory the Theologian and is repeated by St. John of Damascus. The tangible Paradise was a particular place, and the intelligible Paradise was the communion and union of man with God. And of course the two Paradises interpenetrated, in the sense that the Paradise of Eden was receiving God's uncreated energy.

St. Gregory of Sinai gives us an interpretation of Paradise, which was the second period of the Church. He writes that Paradise was twofold, "tangible and intelligible, namely that in Eden and that of grace". About the Paradise of Eden he says that it was not completely incorruptible nor completely corruptible, but it had been created "between corruption and incorruption". The trees that were in Paradise had their natural cycle of flower-bearing, fruit-bearing and the falling of the fruits. When the ripe fruits fell to the ground, and when the trees decayed "they became fragrant dust and did not have a stench like the plants of the world". There was the natural recycling in the trees and plants, but since Adam had not yet lost the grace of God and therefore the deep darkness had not fallen on the whole creation, there was no decay, a stench did not prevail. There was the whole cycle, but not also decay and stench. And this was so, as St. Gregory of Sinai says, "because of the great wealth and holiness of the ever-abounding grace there".

Through Adam's fall, man's communion with God, with himself, and with the whole creation was broken. Thus man was wearing the garments of the skin of decay and mortality, and of course the whole creation fell into darkness, and "has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time" (Rom. 8:22).

However, in spite of Adam's fall, the Church does not disappear completely. Man struggles to restore his communion with God and attempts it through various forms of religion, because he has lost the true mindfulness and real knowledge of God.

In the Old Testament there were righteous men, like the Judges, Prophets and saints, who were blessed with divine revelation and vision. They saw God. And since the vision of God in the teaching of the Fathers of the Church is identified with deification and man's communion with God, we say that in the Old Testament the small remnant is preserved, the Church exists.

In what follows I would like to cite some patristic passages which clarify this truth.

We know from the teaching of the saints that all the manifestations of God in the Old Testament are manifestations of the Word, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity. The difference between the manifestations in the Old and New Testaments is that in the former we have manifestations of the unincarnate Word, while in the New Testament we have manifestations of the incarnate Word.

Speaking on this theme, St. Gregory the Theologian, in his Homily on the Maccabees, says that the saints in the Old Testament knew Christ, and calls this saying mysterious and ineffable. He says that before the incarnation of Christ no one was perfected without faith in Christ. "For the Word spoke boldly later in His own times, but He was also known before to the pure in mind, as is clear from many held in honour before that". And indeed he says of the Maccabees that we should not scorn them with the justification that they lived and acted before the cross, "but that they should be praised in accordance with the cross and are worthy of honour by their words". The righteous men in the Old Testament acted according to the teaching of the cross and, essentially, they experienced the mystery of the Cross.

St. John Chrysostom, referring to the righteous men of the Old Testament, says that they too belong to the Body of Christ, because "they too knew Christ". Besides, by His incarnation Christ, as Chrysostom says again, "assumed flesh of the Church". The Body of Christ is one and the Church is one. Chrysostom asks: "What is one body?" And he himself answers characteristically: "The faithful of the world everywhere, those who are, those who have been and those who will be. And again, those who were well pleasing to God before Christ's appearance are one body". Moreover, both the Old and New Testaments are inspired by the same Spirit. Therefore the holy Father says again: "The Old and New Testaments are of the same spirit, and the same Spirit that uttered the voice then has spoken here". And this is seen from the fact that the holy Fathers interpreted the Old Testament, just as they also interpreted the New Testament, they spoke about dogmatic topics with arguments from the Old Testament as well as Old Testament persons whom they presented as examples of perfection. A characteristic example is St. Gregory of Nyssa, who, in order to present an example of a perfect spiritual man, analysed the person and work of Moses. The life of Moses is a model of the spiritual life for every Christian.

But also the champion of Orthodoxy, Athanasios the Great, presents a teaching of the same kind. He writes that the Holy Spirit is one Who, both then, that is, in the Old Testament, and now, sanctifies and comforts those receptive to being comforted. "As one and the very Logos Son Himself leading the worthy ones into adoption even then. For they were sons also in the Old Testament, but if adopted by the Son, not by another".

Thus there was a Church in the Old Testament as well, in spite of the fall of man. Members of this Church were the righteous and the Prophets, who had the grace of God. This is confirmed by the sacramental practice of the Church. All the sacraments which we perform in the Christian Church have reference to the Sacraments and rites of the Old Testament. We can take the Sacrament of marriage as an example. During the this ceremony, in the prayers which we address to God, we ask Him to bless the couple, as He blessed Abraham and Sarah, Jacob and Rebecca, etc. Then the words "bless them, our Lord God as Thou didst bless Abraham and Sarah" show that the blessing is the same. We observe this in all the sacraments. Actually there is one difference which we shall see in the next section, about the third period of the Church, that of the incarnation of Christ. In any case, here it is to be noted that the Church exists also in the Old Testament.

c) The Church in the New Testament

With the incarnation of Christ we have the manifestation of the Church. The Church becomes the Body of Christ and acquires its Head, Who is Christ. Let us recall the passage in Clement of Rome which we mentioned before, according to which the Church was "first created spiritual from above, before the sun and moon, and being spiritual, was manifested in the flesh of Christ". And St. Maximos the Confessor says characteristically: "the mystery hidden from the ages and from the generations, was now made manifest by the true and perfect incarnation of the son of God, who united our nature to Himself inseparably and unconfusedly".

By the incarnation of Christ the human nature which Christ assumed was made divine, and through this the Christians, the members of the Church, are full members of the Body of Christ.

Here too we find the difference between the New and Old Testaments. At this point there needs to be an explanation, so that we can place things in their true dimensions.

We said before that in the Old Testament the holy Prophets attained deification. For according to the teaching of the holy Fathers, and of St. Gregory Palamas as well, the vision of God, which is the vision of the uncreated Light, comes through man's deification. The man is deified and thus made worthy of seeing the uncreated glory of God. Man cannot see God by his own powers. In the Church we sing: "in Thy light shall we see light". Thus the vision of God comes from within, not from outside, that is to say it takes place through man's deification. It is not a matter of seeing external things and signs. This is a crucial point in patristic theology. In this sense the holy Fathers speak of the friends of the Cross who existed in the Old Testament, and say that the righteous ones of the Old Testament, such as Abraham, Moses, etc., experienced the mystery of the Cross.

However, this deification of the Prophets was temporary, because death had not yet been abolished, and that is why they were brought to Hades and the vision was outside the Body of the divine human Christ. This is seen in the difference between the experience of the Apostles at the Transfiguration of Christ and the experience which they themselves had on the day of Pentecost.

At the Transfiguration the Disciples saw the uncreated glory of the Holy Trinity in the human nature of the Logos. In order for them to attain this great experience, they had to have been

transfigured beforehand: "they were changed in turn, and they saw the change". This change of the Disciples is identical with deification. Through deification they attained the vision of God, and therefore in the patristic teaching the vision of God is connected with men's deification. However, although the vision of the uncreated glory of God came from within, that is to say, through deification, nevertheless the Light which poured forth from the Divine human Body of Christ was external to the holy Apostles, since they had not yet become members of the Body of Christ.

At Pentecost we have this great gift. The Disciples saw the glory of God inwardly, that is to say through deification, but also from within the Divine-human Body of Christ, since with the coming of the Holy Spirit they had become members of the Body of Christ. At Pentecost the Body of Christ was not external to the Apostles, as it was at the Transfiguration, but internal, in the sense that the Disciples had become members of the Body of Christ and as members of the Body of Christ they were worthy of this experience.

With the incarnation of Christ the Church became a Body. The Sacraments of the New Testament are different in this way from the Sacraments of the Old Testament. They are performed within the Church, which is the Body of Christ, and they have reference to and conclude in the Sacrament of the divine Eucharist, in which we eat and drink the Body and Blood of Christ. Through the Sacrament of marriage God's blessing is offered, as in the Old Testament, but at the same time it is linked with the Sacrament of the Divine Eucharist as well, and thus the relationship of the couple is not only a biological unity, but also an ecclesiastical, eucharistic unity. This has great significance and gives a different perspective and a different authentication to the Sacraments.

d) The perpetuity of the Church

By his incarnation Christ assumed human nature, and indeed human nature was united with the divine nature immutably, without confusion, inseparably, unchangeably and indivisibly. They are never separated. They remain united forever.

Thus the Church will exist also after the Second Coming of Christ and we shall be able to speak of the perfect manifestation of the Church. This is said from the point of view that the saints are already tasting the last things, because, as we said in the beginning, the last things in the Church are not isolated from the first and intermediate things. Living in the Church, we reach the state of Adam in Paradise before the fall, and we ascend still higher, because we attain communion and unity with Christ, united in His Divine-human Body, having become members of His Body.

The saints from now on are enjoying the glory of God, and therefore St. Symeon the New Theologian says that those who have been granted the vision of the uncreated Light are not waiting for the Second Coming, because they are already experiencing the Kingdom of God.

Besides, the Kingdom of God is not something created, nor is it an earthly reality, but, as St. Gregory Palamas teaches, participation in the Kingdom of God is identified and linked with the vision of the uncreated Light.

However, there will be a continuous perfecting of this participation in the glory of God. This is important, because if the future life is a stationary condition, then it will not have fullness. St. Gregory of Sinai says characteristically: "It is said that in the age to come, the Angels and saints ever increase in gifts of grace and never abate their longing for further blessings. No lapse or veering from virtue to vice takes place in that life".

And St. Gregory Palamas, referring to this point, speaks of the continual development in deification, in man's continual perfecting. Asking: "Do not the saints progress infinitely in the vision of God in the age to come?" He gives the answer himself: "In everything it is clearly to infinity". Indeed he makes use of the case of the Angels who, according to the teaching of St. Dionysios the Areopagite, become increasingly receptive "to the clearest illumination". God is infinite and therefore grants His grace abundantly and plentifully. St. Gregory Palamas asks: "What way is left but for the sons of the age to come, to advance in this to infinity, admitted from grace to grace and patiently making the tireless ascent?" This will be because, according to the same saint. "the previous grace empowers them to partake of greater things".

Of course, in saying these things, we must emphasise that it is not a matter of the restoration of all things, a teaching which was not adopted by the Church, but of the development and perfection of the saints, those who during their lives partook of the purifying, illuminating and deifying energy of God. For those men who did not participate even in the purifying grace of God, that is to say, did not enter the stage of repentance, this good development will not take effect. Furthermore, the passages which we mentioned speak of the saints who acquired the grace of God, and therefore in them the previous grace is empowering towards participation in greater things. Therefore the memorial services which the Church performs for those who have died also have this aim. They help the person in his perfecting, because, according to the teaching of the saints, "this is the perfect unending perfection of the perfect ones".

In this sense we can say that after the Second Coming of Christ we shall have a more complete manifestation of the glory of God. And it is in this perspective that we should interpret the teaching of the saints that now we have as a pledge a taste of the good things of the Kingdom of God.

3. Conclusion

After all that has been reported we must end with a few conclusions, without, of course, having exhausted this great theme.

a) Only in Christ is there salvation. Since the saints of the Old Testament saw the unincarnate Word and the saints of the New Testament saw and see the incarnate Word and have close communion with Him, this means that man's salvation takes place only through Christ. And of course since Christ is the Second Person of the Holy Trinity and salvation is a common action of the Trinitarian God, it means that we are saved when we have communion with the Holy Trinity, when the grace of the Trinitarian God enters our being, when "the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God the Father and the communion of the Holy Spirit" are with us.

b) The Church is not a human organisation, but a Divine-Human Organism. It is not a human corporation, but the Divine-human Body of Christ. The source of the Church is this God Himself. It is not men's invention, it is not a fruit and result of men's social need, but it is the sole place of man's salvation. That is to say, the impression is created that men made the Church in order to be able to survive in such difficult and tragic social conditions of life. But, as we explained before, the source of the Church is God Himself, and man's salvation takes place within it. Clement of Alexandria observes: "for just as it is a work of his will and is called the world, so also the salvation of men is his will and this is called the church". And this means that the Church will never cease to exist, in spite of such difficult and unfavourable circumstances.

c) In the Church all the problems are solved. We are not speaking of an abstract Christianity which we link with an ideology, but of a Church which is a communion of God and man, of angels and men, of earthly and heavenly, of man and world. The Church is "a meeting of heaven and earth". Peace, justice, etc. , are not simply some social conventions, but gifts which are given in the Church. Peace as well as justice and all the other virtues, such as love etc. are experiences of the Church. In the Church we experience the real peace, justice and love, which are essential energies of God.

d) The Church is the Body of Christ, which has Christ as its head, and the members of the Church are members of the Body of Christ. Members of the Church exist in all the ages and will exist until the end of all time. And when members of the Church cease to exist, the end of the world will come. Thus we are living with many people. The people of God manifest the true communion. As we said at the beginning, on the paten during the Liturgy there are many people. They are the Panagia, the Angels, the Prophets, the holy Fathers, the great martyrs, and, in general, the witnesses of the faith, the saints and ascetics, the living and the dead who have a share in the purifying, illuminating and deifying uncreated energy of God. We are not alone. We are not "foreigners and aliens, but fellow citizens with the saints and members of God's household" (Eph. 2,19).

The greatest gift of grace which we have is that we belong to the Church. The greatest gift is that we are in this great Family. We should value this gift, we should feel very deeply moved and struggle to remain in the Church, experiencing its sanctifying grace and showing by our lives that we are in its place of redemption and sanctification. Thus we shall also have the great gift of the "blessed ending", when we are granted to lie asleep "in the midst of the Church".

From the book titled The Mind of the Orthodox Church.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:56 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Ecclesiology, Heresy
Reactions: 

Saint Augustine, Bishop of Hippo

St. Augustine of Hippo (Feast Day - June 15)

Aflame with the love of God, O Augustine, thou didst
Prove to be an all-radiant luminary, O Blessed one.

Augustine (also named Aurelius), one of the Holy Fathers of our Church, was born on November 13 in the year of salvation 354 in Thagaste (a town in Numidia, not far from Madaura and Hippo). His father was called Patricius, who was from a notable family but was not very well-to-do. Originally a pagan, he subsequently embraced Christianity and received Holy Baptism towards the end of his life. Augustine’s mother was called Monica. She was from a Christian family and was adorned with every virtue. From his earliest years, she endeavored with ardent zeal to inspire her son with the Divine teachings of Christianity. But she did not reckon herself to be a perfect mother, as she was wont to say, insofar as she would be unable to impart the life of Grace to him to whom she had given physical life. In truth, all of her holy longings were fulfilled according to her prayers, and the pious mother rejoicedfrom the bottom of her heart and glorified God when she saw her beloved son, Augustine, growing up in the fear of the Lord and giving good hopes for his future.

However, her joy did not last for long. For the young man, whom his parents sent to be educated, first in Madaura and later in Carthage, acquired a great deal of basic knowledge, thanks to his keenness of spirit and natural love of learning, but at the same time he went astray and began to lead an extremely dissolute life. He was seduced by bad company and wicked entertainments, and there no longer remained in his soul any of his mother’s salutary counsels and precepts. The Saint describes in his Confessions the dreadful pit of sins into which he fell and deplores the fact that he began to anger the Lord even from that age, which is customarily and inaccurately called the “age of innocence.” He laments the precious time that he wasted in empty studies, from which one could not profit in any other way than somehow to satisfy one day an insatiable desire for the goods and honors of this world, which, as he says, are poverty and ignominy, if we examine them closely.

Of all these secular studies, St. Augustine extols his reading of poetry, saying that he derived great benefit from this. For it not only perfected his diction, but also strengthened his intellectual abilities, and primarily that of inventiveness—an indispensable attribute of creative minds. He also said that from this study he acquired that wealth and height of reasoning and utterance which exalt our nature above itself, and facility in expressing himself eloquently and suitably as occasion demanded.


As if the moral debauchery that overcame his otherwise naturally noble and upright soul were not enough, he who was later to become a fervent champion of the true religion fell, in addition, into the heresy of the Manichæans, being attracted by their pretentious arguments. Although he did not find in the reveries of this monstrous heresy the spiritual respite for which his heart so passionately yearned, he nonetheless persisted in it for nine whole years, after which he had finally had his fill of it. However, not finding anywhere to lay his excited and restless spirit, he fell from Scylla into Charybdis and espoused the errors of the Skeptics, through which he came to entertain doubts about everything.

When she learned of this twofold shipwreck of Augustine’s morals and faith, his devout and virtuous mother was sorely distressed and entreated God day and night with torrents of tears to enlighten her son’s mind, darkened as it was by passions and delusion. Seeking some relief from the weight of her sorrow and hoping, at the same time, to remedy the evil into which Augustine had fallen, she hastened to a certain Bishop to confess her anguish to him and appealed to him for help in amending the ideas and behavior of her erring son. But this virtuous Bishop, after comforting her in a fatherly way over her misfortune, advised her to endure her suffering with perseverance and with hope to entrust the spiritual healing of her son to God. “The only thing that we can do for the young man, for the time being, is to entreat God for his salvation; so calm down and have confidence in Divine aid, for it is impossible for the Father of mercy and compassions to leave in perdition a son who is mourned with so many tears.”

And indeed, the response of this holy man came true, as if it were a Divine prophecy. After a short time, at any rate, Divine Providence brought the ailing Augustine to the hands of the only doctor who could cure his illness. The city of Milan, in need of a teacher of rhetoric, wrote to Symmachus, the Eparch of Rome, asking him to provide someone suitable for the post. He chose Augustine, who had already taught this art in Carthage with proficiency, and sent him to Milan. The Bishop of the Church of Milan at that time was the Divine Ambrose, and from their first encounter these two men felt such great empathy for each other that, although they were at odds in their way of thinking, they were bound together thenceforth in a very close friendship. Thanks to this friendship, and also delighted by Ambrose’s eloquence, Augustine frequently went to listen to his sermons.

But no matter how much pleasure he took in the oratory of the Orthodox Bishop St. Ambrose, and even though he was inwardly convinced by the Saint’s arguments, he persisted all the more doggedly in his erroneous ideas, obstinately seeking to find the truth outside the only sanctuary in which it resided (as he himself says in his Confessions), smitten by the reproaches of his conscience, held fast by habit, misled by fear, enslaved by passion, and inwardly moved by the beauty of virtue. At the same time, he was entranced by the seductions of vice, even as he unceasingly contended against the errors of his heresy and its religious rituals, seeking safety on dry land, like one shipwrecked, going from reef to reef, gashed by steep and rugged rocks, encountering and yet avoiding the light that ran behind him, grumbling about the weight of his fetters, all the while fending off the hand that sought to release him from these fetters.


Such are the vivid hues in which Augustine depicts the inner conflict of truth and error, of faith and blind obstinacy, which went on within his soul and held it in the grip of unending turmoil. But finally, overcome one day by intense emotions while talking with some friends, he left them and took refuge in a lonely grove in their garden, where he found the peace which was—alas!—missing from his heart. There, he fell to the ground, writhing and groaning from pain of soul, and, moistening the earth with bitter and abundant tears, implored God to have pity on him and show him mercy by coming to his aid.

While in this poignant situation he suddenly (as he himself relates) heard a sweet voice coming from a neighboring house and saying: “Take up and read.” Never had his soul been seized by this kind of emotion. Astonished and beside himself, thinking the matter over and unable to remember from where that voice had come, pondering and unable to understand what he had been recommended to read, he arose and, borne along by some invisible force, ran to find his friend Alypius in the place where he had left him. There, he saw a book lying on a table. He grabbed it in tumult of soul, opened it (this book contained the Epistles of St. Paul), and the first words on which his gaze fell were the following exhortations of the Apostle to the Romans: “Not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying; but put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof” (Romans 13:13-14).

As soon as Augustine read this passage, a ray of light entered his soul and immediately dispelled the thick darkness that encompassed it, and he had no need to read any further. All the spirit of the Apostle, who, like him, had previously been a cruel persecutor of Jesus and who subsequently, enlightened by heavenly illumination, became a brilliant preacher of the Truth, entered through these few words into the soul of this new convert, diffusing therein faith and the heavenly peace that accompanies it. Finding all at once in the Faith of Christ everything for which he had been searching elsewhere, and embracing all of the dogmas of Christianity, he hastened to wash away the filth of his former sins through the laver of regeneration. Along with his illegitimate son, Adeodatus, whom he had fathered from a concubine, he was Baptized on the Vigil of Pascha by the Divine Ambrose. Augustine was thirty-two years old at the time.


Shortly thereafter, he returned to his native land, having resolved to settle there for good. The joy of his mother, who a short time before was mourning both her deceased husband and her lost son, was indescribable. But this virtuous woman did not survive long after the conversion of her son; she commended her spirit to the Lord, while blessing Him for vouchsafing her to see all of her prayers fulfilled. Augustine very vividly describes in a letter to his friend Alypius how bitterly he lamented the loss of such a good and loving mother. Among other things, he says that he felt that that twofold life, consisting of his mother’s life and his own, had been torn asunder.

Nevertheless, the prominence of Augustine’s family and his splendid education quickly made him known everywhere in his homeland, while the strictness of his life and his virtue and piety elicited universal respect and love for him. Hence, one day, while he was in Church after arriving in Hippo, the Bishop of that city, Valerius, said that he was in need of a suitable Priest for his Church, and all the people turned and looked at Augustine. They declared with acclamations that he was the worthiest man to fill this vacancy and almost resorted to force in order to persuade him to accept this office. Along with it, the Bishop also entrusted him with the burden of preaching the Divine Word, which, according to the custom that prevailed in Africa, belonged to the Bishop alone.

Although Augustine accepted this heavy burden with reluctance, after accepting it, he carried out all of his duties with most fervent and holy zeal. He would teach sometimes in Latin, which the people of Hippo understood, and at other times in Punic for the sake of foreigners who did not understand Latin, and his natural eloquence, inspiration, and skill endowed his sermons with such power that his words rarely fell on rocky ground, because his inspired oratory had softened these rocks into fertile earth. Very often, poor people, inhumanly oppressed by the rich, slaves maltreated by harsh and tyrannical masters, and sometimes even entire communities harassed by the powerful, waited for the holy orator on the road in order to ask him to speak on their behalf, in the certainty that a single word from him would suffice to improve their lot. As an example of the force of his words we cite, here, just the following account.


In Cæsarea, Mauritania, according to an age-old custom, all of the citizens went out of the city every year; they would divide into two rival camps and, with brothers against brothers and fathers against children, they would begin pelting each other with stones in a terrible and relentless fight. These maneuvers ended in the total defeat of one of the factions, with dreadful results, as one might expect: the mutual killing and wounding, without any cause, of citizens who were completely at peace with one another. Wishing to put an end to this inhuman and barbaric custom, Augustine went out, on the anniversary of the battle, onto the plain where the people were gathered together, ready for the fight, and spoke to the citizens. They all accepted his words with applause, thereby showing their admiration and paying due tribute to the eloquence of the Blessed Augustine.

But this display of flattery did not satisfy the holy orator; he returned to the topic of his speech, expressing himself with such emotion that they all began to feel something more than mere admiration for his words. They jostled and crowded around him so as to hear him better; for from his mouth there dripped the honey of love for mankind and religious devotion, which spoke vividly and fervently
at that moment as never before. The slings and stones fell from the hands of his audience and tears of emotion flowed from their eyes in streams. All of those fierce barbarians praised the speaker with sobs and fell down before him in veneration, and then, after embracing each other, they returned en masse to the city, glorifying and blessing God for granting them such a teacher and guide. Thenceforth, that antiquated custom was completely abolished. Very frequently did Augustine win such rhetorical victories.1

When the virtuous Valerius, the aforementioned Bishop of Hippo, saw these things, rather than envying the resounding triumphs of his assistant (as many in our day would certainly do), on the contrary, he rejoiced in a fatherly way and, fearing lest some other city should ask for Augustine to become Bishop before he did so, he decided to make him his fellow Bishop on the ground that, owing to his advanced age and infirmity, he could no longer cope with the burdens of his office. As before, Augustine persistently objected to accepting this new office, arguing that it was contrary to the Canons of the Church for a new Bishop to be assigned to a Church in which there was already another Bishop who was still alive;2 but again he was compelled to submit to the will of Divine Providence, and in 395 he was Consecrated Bishop of Hippo.


The many cares of this new office in no way blunted Augustine’s zeal for teaching and writing, but whenever he had time off from his Episcopal duties, he used it for composing homilies, religious and philosophical treatises, critiques, translations of religious books from other languages, and regular correspondence with intellectuals, Bishops, and even rulers and kings, to whom his reputation and writings had become well known. Although he was occupied with these intellectual benefactions, he devoted himself at the same time to works of charity with godly zeal, providing relief and consolation to the unfortunate and afflicted who had recourse to him, mitigating the lot of slaves, feeding and clothing the poor and exhausting his own resources for their sake, personally visiting those in need, and aiding as far as he was able those who sought his assistance.

After spending his life performing deeds so worthy of imitation and always offering himself as an example of every virtue for his flock, and having reached the seventy-sixth year of his life, in 430 he entrusted his blessed soul into the hands of God, unto Whom are due all glory, honor, and worship, unto the ages of ages. Amen.

1 Cf. De Doctrina Christiana, IV.53, Patrologia Latina, Vol. XXXIV, cols. 115-116.
2 This is, in fact, forbidden by the Eighth Canon of the Synod of Nicæa.


Source: Ὁ Μέγας Συναξαριστὴς τῆς ᾿Ορθοδόξου ᾿Εκκλησίας (Athens: Matthaios Langes, 1979), 5th ed., Vol. VI, pp. 206-214.


Apolytikion in the Third Tone
Thou didst prove to be a radiant vessel of the Divine Spirit and an expounder of the City of God, O Blessed Augustine; and thou didst minister piously unto the Savior, as a wise and God-inspired Hierarch. O Holy Father, entreat Christ God that He grant us great mercy.

Kontakion in Plagal of the Fourth Tone
Having acquired the radiance of wisdom, thou didst prove to be a Divine instrument of piety, O Hierarch Augustine, thou favorite of Christ. As an initiate of godly love, raise up on the wings of Divine longing us who cry unto thee: Rejoice, O God-inspired Father.

Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:52 AM 8 comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Saints
Reactions: 

Photos: 25,000 Attend Velikoretsky Crucession


The 800km litany in honor of St. Nicholas began on Friday 3 June 2011 and ended on Tuesday 8 June 2011.

Read more about it at the following link:

An 800 Kilometer Litany In Honor of St. Nicholas of Velikoretsky

















Sources here and here.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:30 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Orthodoxy in Russia, Saints
Reactions: 

The Testimony of the Spirit of God


By St. Nikolai Velimirovich

"The Spirit of truth that proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me" (John 15:26).

God's Son sent God the Holy Spirit into the world to testify about Him until the end of time. "He will testify of Me."

How will God the Spirit testify about God the Son? God the Spirit will testify in many ways:

By attracting the souls of men to Christ's Church;

By revealing to them the meaning of the Holy Scripture;

By leading their minds to the commandments of Christ;

By giving warmth, freshness, power and gentleness to the words of Christ;

By converting repentant sinners into righteous ones;

By fulfilling all the promises and prophecies of Christ upon men and upon nations and upon God's Church;

By strengthening the Church of Christ and holding it firm against all the tempests of the times and all the evils of Hades and men throughout the ages of ages.

The Spirit which works in these and many other similar ways is the Spirit of God, the Spirit of Truth, Good, Life creating and All-powerful.

Not one of Christ's words goes against the Spirit of God nor does the Spirit of God go against a single word of Christ. That is why when the Spirit of God pleases to enter into the heart of man, He becomes alive and becomes a true witness to all that Christ said and did. Then, man believes joyfully and unwaveringly. For how would he not believe the greatest and the most enduring Eyewitness and Participator of all the words, all the miracles and all the works of Christ?

That is why, brethren, let us pray before all and above all that this Eyewitness and Participator, the Holy Spirit and All-powerful, settle in our hearts so that our faith may become alive, unwavering and joy-creating.

O God the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth, come and abide in us.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:01 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: God, Pascha and the Pentecostarion
Reactions: 

Human/Ape Common Ancestry: Following the Evidence


By Casey Luskin

Human/ape common ancestry has been a subject much discussed recently. A friend wrote me asking for links dealing with human/ape common ancestry. While there are numerous good articles that have talked about this issue from an intelligent design (ID) friendly perspective, I tried to provide him with some helpful links and information.

As a preliminary point, it's important to note that human/ape common ancestry is compatible with ID. Nonetheless, ID proponents are interested in taking a scientific approach to these questions, and the evidence suggests that even modest changes requiring two or more mutations before conferring any adaptive benefit could not arise via Darwinian evolution under any reasonable timescale involving human/ape common ancestry. As a result, questions about human/ape common ancestry should be on the table for people who really want to follow the evidence where it leads.

The basic issue is this: Despite the fact that human/ape genetic similarities are often overstated, YES, in many instances it is true that humans and chimps have very high levels of genetic similarity. Does this bolster neo-Darwinian evolution and human/ape common ancestry? In fact, we could have predicted these similarities without any knowledge of Darwinian evolution simply by observing that humans have similar body plans to apes. If similar morphology implies similar genetics, then we could predict these high levels of similarities without even thinking about considerations pertaining to common ancestry.

But there's another important point to consider: Functional morphological and genetic similarities between humans and apes could be the result of common design just as much as common descent. That's a good principle to keep in mind as you investigate this issue: functional biological similarity is explained by common design just as well as it's explained by common descent. (In fact, in some cases--such as extreme convergent evolution--such similarity is explained much better by common design.)

Read the rest here.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 9:52 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Science-Intelligent Design-Darwinism
Reactions: 

Pentecost Celebrated on Holy Zion in Jerusalem



The Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem celebrated the day after Holy Pentecost in the Church of Mount Zion with the Great Vespers for the Monday of the Holy Spirit (June 13, 2011). Archbishop Theophanos of Gerasim celebrated and read the "kneeling" prayers in both Greek and Arabic.

Holy Zion is considered the site where many events described in the New Testament took place, such as:

- the Washing of the Feet
- some resurrection appearances of Jesus
- the gathering of the disciples after the Ascension of Jesus
- the election of Saint Matthias as apostle
- the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the disciples on the day of Pentecost

(Read more about the site here, here and here)
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 8:43 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Orthodoxy In Israel, Pascha and the Pentecostarion
Reactions: 

Distinguishing Scientific Evidence From Philosophical Interpretation



Read also: Science Doesn't Say Anything - Scientists Do
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 8:31 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Philosophy, Science-Intelligent Design-Darwinism
Reactions: 

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

St. Justin Popovich: Orthodoxy and the Theory of Evolution


The God-man Evolution

By St. Justin Popovich

You ask me to answer the question, whether the scientific understanding of the evolution of the world and man can coexist with the traditional Orthodox experience and knowledge. Also, you ask, what is the position of the Fathers on this issue, and whether there is a general need for such a coexistence. In a short summary, I write the following:

The anthropology of the New Testament stands or falls on the anthropology of the Old. The entire Gospel of the Old Testament: Man - the image of God! The entire Gospel of the New Testament: the God-man - image of man! Whatever is heavenly, divine, eternal, immortal and unchangeable in humans is the image of God, the godlikeness of man.

This godlikeness of man was assaulted by the voluntary sin of the same, in partnership with the devil, by means of sin and death which stems from the transgression. That is why God became man, in order to restore His corrupt image from sin. That is why He incarnated and lived in the world of man as the God-man, as the Church, to offer the image of God - man - all the necessary means so that this deformed God-formed man can be able in the God-man body of the Church, with the help of Sacred Mysteries and virtues, to mature "to a perfect man, to the measure of the age of the fullness of Christ" (Eph. 4:13). This is the God-man anthropology. The purpose of godlike beings known as humans is one: to become gradually perfect as God the Father, to become a god by grace, to attain theosis, deification, Christification, Trinitification. According to the Holy Fathers, "God became man, that man may become a god" (Athanasius the Great).

But the so-called "scientific" anthropology does not recognize the godlikeness of human existence. With this, they deny the advancement of the God-man evolution of the human being.

If man is not the image of God, then the God-man and His Gospel is something unnatural for such a man, something mechanical and unattainable. Then the God-man Jesus is a robot built by other robots. The God-man becomes a bully because he wants from people, forcibly, to become a perfect being like God. In essence we are talking about a forensic utopia, an illusion and an unattainable "ideal". In the end, it is reduced to a myth, a narrative.

If man, therefore, is not a godlike being, then the God-man himself is unnecessary because the scientific theories of evolution do not accept sin, nor the Savior from sin. In the secular world of "evolution" everything is natural and there is no room for sin to exist. That is why it is a joke to speak of a Savior and salvation from sin. In the final analysis everything is natural: sin, evil and death. For, if everything in man occurs and is the result of evolution, then there is nothing that needs to be saved in him since nothing is immortal and unchangeable within him, but all is earthly and clay and as such are transient, perishable and perceptible.

In such a world of "evolution" there is no place for the Church, which is the body of the God-man Christ. The theology which again bases itself on the anthropology of the "scientific" theory of evolution is nothing more than a self-negation. In essence it is a theology without God and an anthropology without man. If man is not immortal, eternal and a God-man image of God, then all theologies and all anthropologies are nothing but a silly joke, a tragic comedy.

Orthodox theology and the relationship we have with the Holy Fathers is the way for our ascent to the God-man, the Orthodox All-truth. This is something in need of analysis, and is for those dealing with issues of the gospel on the planet. All the problems of the gospel are essentially focused on the problem of man. And all the problems of man are focused on one issue, that of the God-man. Only the God-man is the universal solution to the enigma called man. Without the God-man and outside of the God-man, man is always - consciously or not - transformed into something sub-human, a human effigy, a superman, a devil-man. Proof and evidence for this? The entire history of mankind.

Source: Translation by John Sanidopoulos
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 4:44 PM 5 comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Anthropology, Atheism-Agnosticism-Skepticism, Science-Intelligent Design-Darwinism
Reactions: 

The Holy Prophet Elisha

Holy Elisha the Prophet (Feast Day - June 14)

The Holy Prophet Elisha lived in the ninth century before the Birth of Christ, and was a native of the village of Abelmaum, near Jordan. By the command of the Lord he was called to prophetic service by the holy Prophet Elias (Elijah - July 20).

When it became time for the Prophet Elias to be taken up to Heaven, he said to Elisha, "Ask what shall I do for you, before I am taken from you." Elisha boldly asked for a double portion of the grace of God: "Let there be a double portion of your spirit upon me." The Prophet Elias said, "You have asked a hard thing; if you see me when I am taken from you, then so shall it be for you; but if you don't see me, it will not be" (4 [2] Kings 2: 12). As they went along the way talking, there appeared a fiery chariot and horses and separated them both. Elisha cried out, "My father, my father, the chariot of Israel and its horse!" (4 Kings 2: 12). Picking up the mantle of his teacher which fell from the sky, Elisha received the power and prophetic gift of Elias. He spent more than 65 years in prophetic service, under six Israelite kings (from Ahab to Joash). While Elisha lived, he did not tremble before any prince, and no word could overcome him (Sirach 48:13).

The holy prophet worked numerous miracles. He divided the waters of the Jordan, having struck it with the mantle of the Prophet Elias; he made the waters of a Jericho spring fit for drinking; he saved the armies of the kings of Israel and Judah that stood in an arid wilderness by bringing forth abundant water by his prayer; he delivered a poor widow from death by starvation through a miraculous increase of oil in a vessel. The Shunamite woman showing hospitality to the prophet was gladdened by the birth of a son through his prayer, and when the child died, he was raised back to life by the prophet. The Syrian military-commander Namaan was healed from leprosy but the prophet's servant Gehazi was afflicted since he disobeyed the prophet and took money from Namaan on the sly.

Elisha predicted to the Israelite king Joash the victory over his enemies, and by the power of his prayer he worked many other miracles (4 Kings 3-13). The holy Prophet Elisha died in old age at Samaria. "In his life he worked miracles, and at death his works were marvellous" (Sir. 48: 15). A year after his death, a corpse was thrown into the prophet's grave. As soon as the dead man touched Elisha's bones, he came to life and stood up (4 Kings 13: 20-21). The Prophet Elisha and his teacher, the Prophet Elias, left no books behind them, since their prophetic preaching was oral. Jesus, son of Sirach, praised both great prophets (Sir. 48:1-15).

John of Damascus composed a canon in honor of the Prophet Elisha, and at Constantinople a church was built in his honor.

Julian the Apostate (361-363) gave orders to burn the relics of the Prophet Elisha, Abdia (Obadiah) and John the Forerunner, but the holy relics were preserved by believers, and part of them were transferred to Alexandria.

In the twentieth century, the humble priest Nicholas Planas had a great veneration for the Prophet Elisha, and was accounted worthy to see him in visions.

Source


Apolytikion in the Fourth Tone
The incarnate Angel, and the Prophets' summit and boast, the second forerunner of the coming of Christ our God, Elias, the glorious, from above sent down his grace upon Elisseus; he doth cast out sickness and doth also cleanse lepers; and unto all that honour him, he poureth forth streams of cures.

Kontakion in the Plagal of the Fourth Tone
A prophet of God didst thou become when worthily thou hadst been vouchsafed a double portion of God's grace as Elias' true companion, O Elisha, divinely-blest; and with him, thou unceasingly entreatest Christ God in behalf of us all.

Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 12:35 PM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Old Testament
Reactions: 

Serb Students React To Fr. Theodore Zisis and on the True Views of St. Justin On Ecumenism


This debate was initiated from the contents translated at this link titled Fr. Theodoros Zisis Responds To St. Justin Popovich, at which time Fr. Theodore Zisis in his younger years criticized the stance of St. Justin Popovich on the topic of Ecumenism. Recently Fr. Theodore has recanted his position and now claims to support St. Justin as an anti-ecumenist, yet followers of St. Justin are arguing that Fr. Theodore misunderstood the position of St. Justin on Ecumenism back then and still does now, taking opposite extremes in his views. Below is an open letter written by a Serbian theologian on behalf of Serbian students regarding the current stance of Fr. Theodore:

The self-promotion by Fr. Theodore Zisis' super-orthodoxy as a father and teacher, supposedly following in the footsteps of St. Justin Popovich and all the Saints, perhaps expresses his confidence, but does not reflect the truth of things.

Father Theodore acknowledged that he harmed the current holy father Justin and publicly confessed his sin and asked forgiveness, but cannot see that he again fell into the same trap and repeated the sins of his youth, but this time towards the true spiritual child, heir and successor of the theology and Christian ethos of St. Justin, the Bishop Atanasije.

The continuing trend of Fr. Theodore from his youth until now to fight the true luminaries of Orthodoxy with the arguments that exist only in his imagination, and fighting them to derive importance and represent the maximum, essentially proves that in fact he falls away and probably does not want or cannot properly understand and interpret things and events of Church life.

We say that Father Theodore reiterated his sin because he either does not understand or does not want to understand the real position of Fr. Atanasije on the issue of the Papacy and Ecumenism, and slanders him about the papacy and that he prays with papists, even though His Eminence Atanasije never went with the papists and never Liturgized together with any non-Orthodox liturgist (as have none of the Serbian bishops).

In the magazine Orthodoxy issued by the Church of Serbia, His Eminence has published the article "On Ecumenism" (Pravoslavlje No. 1055, 01.03.2011, with a handwritten letter of St. Justin) [1] which presents and analyzes the Orthodox God-man Ecumenism of the Holy Father Justin, which is the exact standard followed by His Eminence, while making criticism of the "ekumenisms" of Rome and Geneva.

The Orthodox God-man Ecumenism of St. Justin and His Eminence Atanasije has nothing to do with fears of entanglement with the Pope, and the terrors and threats which anti-ecumenists spread to ordinary people, which not only do not help the situation in Orthodoxy, but make them worse.

In another article published in the popular magazine of the Diocese of Zachoumiou and Herzegovina, Vidoslov 2001 - 2002, His Eminence consolidated a critique of Roman Catholic ekumenism like no other in recent times in the Church of Serbia, and in his book Ecumenism and Ekumenism he clearly and plainly distinguishes the meaning of Orthodox God-man Ecumenism and ekumenisms of any direction.

For Fr. Zisis it seems easier to generalize things and without discrimination to put everything in one basket, showing them in a journalistic fashion of a low-level without the connections. This method is essentially very cheap and degrading, and is intended not for the truth, but for self-promotion and to draw wretched grades, which probably shows his arrogance and pride.

Regarding the theological thought and the depth of the theology of St. Justin and His Eminence Atanasije, for Father Theodore as of now they are an inaccessible ocean, like many other clumsy and legalistic "theologians" that resemble the child who wants to carry the ocean to the nearby well with a cup.

I wish to see Father Theodore Zisis reproduce, not the same mistakes and sins towards the genuine fathers of the Church, but the very recognition of error and repentance.

Personal Note:

Fr. Theodore, we ask that you no longer scandalize the people and pour poison in the minds of the faithful of the Church with the devilish things you do.

With your attitude and your actions, which is clearly schismatic, you not only assist but also openly support the schism in the Church of Serbia.

Sorry, but we are not so foolish as to let the Pope eat up Orthodoxy, nor expect you to save us.

We wish you a good Pascha. Christ is risen!

Frankly and honestly,

For Serbian students in Greece, D. Ristic, theologian

1. In 2010 His Eminence edited a version of the unpublished texts of On the Ecumenism of St. Justin, with photos of the handwritten pages of St. Justin. This book is also in Greek.

If one reads these texts and other writings of St. Justin with an open mind, they can get a complete picture and see that St. Justin had much more depth and width than the self-proclaimed "hyper-orthodox" make of him, in accord with their own image, hard-hearted and exclusive.



The piece above was a reaction to a talk of Fr. Theodore Zisis on 10 April 2011 at the Church of Saint Anthony in Thessaloniki. He spoke of his position on the Ecumenism of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, regrets over his critique in his younger years of St. Justin Popovich, his support for Artemije, his critique of Atanasije, and Ecumenism in general. Below is the original in Greek:

«Αν διαβάσει κανείς το άρθρο μου που είχα γράψει τότε για τον π. Ιουστίνο Πόποβιτς, θα δει εν πρώτοις με πόσο σεβασμό εκφράζομαι για τον π. Ιουστίνο. Θεωρούσα τότε ότι ο π. Ιουστίνος αδικούσε το Οικουμενικό Πατριαρχείο. Αφού εγώ ήμουν στέλεχος του Οικουμενικού Πατριαρχείου; Κι όχι μόνον εγώ... Και ο π. Θεόκλητος Διονυσιάτης τότε έγραψε κείμενο προς τον π. Ιουστίνο πως και εκείνος τότε θεωρούσε πως ο π. Ιουστίνος αδικεί το Οικουμενικό Πατριαρχείο.

Εγώ λοιπόν, επειδή πολλές φορές μου ελέχθη ότι έπρεπε να πάρω θέση, θα πω ότι όντως τότε αδίκησα τον Γέροντα τότε και άγιο τώρα πατέρα Ιουστίνο Πόποβιτς και του απέδωσα ενδεχομένως προθέσεις τις οποίες δεν είχε. Ζητώ συγγνώμην για κείνο το νεανικό μου ατόπημα.

Αλλά θα σας πω κάτι τώρα για να δείτε τι σημαίνει μετάνοια και αλλαγή. Εγώ άλλαξα γραμμή κι ακολουθώ τώρα τη γραμμή του Γέροντος Ιουστίνου Πόποβιτς. Τότε τον κατέκρινα, τώρα ακολουθώ τη γραμμή του Γέροντος Ιουστίνου Πόποβιτς.

Αλλά να τα βλέπουν κάτι άλλοι, οι οποίοι τότε μεν ήταν του π. Ιουστίνου Πόποβιτς, τώρα δε έχουν γίνει οικουμενισταί και φιλοπαπισταί. Αυτοί οι τρεις μαθηταί του Ιουστίνου Πόποβιτς οι οποίοι διώκουν τον επίσκοπο Αρτέμιο.

Ο πρώτος ο οποίος ανεκίνησε εναντίον μου το θέμα του Ιουστίνου Πόποβιτς είναι ο γνωστός επίσκοπος ο Αθανάσιος Γιέφτιτς. «Τι μιλάει ο π. Θεόδωρος; Αυτός στράφηκε εναντίον του Ιουστίνου Πόποβιτς». Εγώ στράφηκα τότε, τώρα είμαι ακόλουθος του. Την γραμμή του αγίου Ιουστίνου ακολουθώ και των αγίων όλων και της Εκκλησίας σταθερά και μόνιμα. Και γι’ αυτό τα βάζετε εναντίον μου τώρα όλοι σας.

Για ακούστε τι έγραφε τότε ο Γιέφτιτς ο οποίος τώρα συμπροσεύχεται και πηγαίνει με τους καρδιναλίους και τους παπικούς, και όλοι αυτοί. Και προδίδουν το δάσκαλό τους, τον Ιουστίνο Πόποβιτς. Υπάρχει ένα βιβλίο, «Η Θεοτόκος», με επιμέλεια του π. Αθανασίου Γιέφτιτς. Κοιτάξτε τότε τι έλεγε για τον παπισμό. Στη σελίδα 268 λέει: «Όλα αυτά για την ορθόδοξον εκκλησιαστικήν συνείδησιν δεν χρειάζονται σχολιασμόν.

Εκείνοι μόνον που με τον πολυθρύλητον οικουμενισμόν έχασαν σήμερον την συνείδησιν αυτήν και τρέχουν δουλικώς προς τον μονάρχην και αιρετικόν της Ρώμης Πάπαν…» Κατακρίνει τότε τον οικουμενισμόν. Και κάνει τώρα αυτός αυτό τώρα. Τρέχει προς τον Πάπαν.

Θεοφιλέστατε Γιέφτιτς, εγώ δεν έτρεξα ποτέ προς τον Πάπαν. Νεαρός ωρίμασα. Τώρα εσύ στο γήρας σου και στη γεροντική σου ηλικία εγκατέλειψες τη γραμμή του Γέροντός σου και τρέχεις εσύ προς τον Πάπα, αντίθετα προς αυτά που έγραφες.

Μη εμφανίζεται εμένα ασυνεπή. Και να εμφανιστείτε εσείς και να ζητήσετε συγγνώμην από το Γέροντά σας επειδή εγκαταλείψατε τη γραμμή σας. Εγώ ζήτησα για νεανικό μου ολίσθημα συγγνώμην».

Ο π. Θεόδωρος διάβασε και πάλι το σχετικό απόσπασμα του βιβλίου του π. Αθανασίου Γιέφτιτς προσθέτοντας και τη συνέχεια και κατόπιν σχολίασε: «Εκείνοι μόνον που με τον πολυθρύλητον οικουμενισμόν έχασαν σήμερον την συνείδησιν αυτήν και τρέχουν δουλικώς προς τον μονάρχην και αιρετικόν της Ρώμης Πάπαν, θα πρέπει τουλάχιστον χάριν συνεπείας να πάψουν να ψάλλουν την ακολουθία του Πάσχα και το αναστάσιμον στιχηρόν του αγίου Ιωάννου Δαμασκηνού “Χαίρε Σιών Αγία, Μήτηρ των Εκκλησιών”». Και ξέρετε γιατί το λέει αυτό;

Καταφερόμενος εναντίον του Οικουμενικού Πατριαρχείου με το οποίον τώρα συνεργάζεται. Επειδή Μήτηρ των Εκκλησιών, Νέα Σιών, θεωρείται από πολλούς το Οικουμενικό Πατριαρχείο λέει «Μήτηρ των Εκκλησιών είναι τα Ιεροσόλυμα. Μην θεωρείται ότι Μήτηρ των Εκκλησιών είναι η Κωνσταντινούπολις». Τώρα όμως με τον Οικουμενικό (Πατριάρχη) συμφωνούν και οικοδομούν τον οικουμενισμό και τον φιλοπαπισμό».

Έκλεισε δε την αναφορά του στο θέμα ο π. Θεόδωρος τονίζοντας: «Εγώ βγήκα, έκανα την έξοδό μου από την αιγυπτιακή αιχμαλωσία και την κρεοφαγία και τα αγαθά του οικουμενισμού, από τις τιμές και τις δόξες. Εγώ έκανα την έξοδό μου. Άλλοι να κοιτάξουν να κάνουν έξοδο.

Και δεν είμαι πλέον αιχμάλωτος στη βαβυλώνια αιχμαλωσία του οικουμενισμου. Αυτή τη βαβυλώνια αιχμαλωσία την είχε διατυπώσει ο Ράνσιμαν για την Τουρκοκρατία. Εγώ λέω πως χειρότερη αιχμαλωσία είναι ο οικουμενισμός. Είναι χειρότερη η τωρινή αιχμαλωσία.

Τότε ήταν ακούσια στους Τούρκους. Τώρα είναι εκούσια στον Οικουμενισμό. Τότε σε κίνδυνο υλικά προσωρινά αγαθά. Τώρα είναι η σωτηρία σε κίνδυνο, αφού στην αίρεση του οικουμενισμού κανείς δεν σώζεται.

Ήμουν μαθητής οικουμενιστών και έγινα μαθητής και ακόλουθος των Αγίων Πατέρων και του αγίου Ιουστίνου Πόποβιτς. Και καυχώμαι γι’ αυτό. Αντίθετα οι μαθηταί του αγίου Ιουστίνου Πόποβιτς είναι τώρα μαθηταί και ακόλουθοι των οικουμενιστών, αιχμάλωτοι του Οικουμενικού Πατριαρχείου και της βαβυλώνιας αιχμαλωσίας του οικουμενισμού».

Source: Translation by John Sanidopoulos
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:28 AM 1 comment: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Ecumenism, Modern Saints and Elders, Orthodox Extremism, Orthodoxy in Serbia
Reactions: 

Response To Slanders Against St. Nikolai Velimirovich and St. Justin Popovich


A response to "religious analyst" Mirko Đorđević in the article "A Surplus of Saints" by Bishop Atanasije. A deficiency of intelligence and integrity, a surplus of petty pretentiousness and malice.

May 11, 2010

Mirko Đorđević, a self-proclaimed "religious analyst" (of the sort for whom only the code for semi-literate journalist applies), wrote a wretched, wicked article in Danas on 10 May 2010 (p. 6) titled "A Surplus of Saints" in which he repeats yet again his vicious and stupid slandering of St. Nikolai of Žiča, now also adding St. Justin the New of Ćelije, following his recent addition to the diptych of the saints, which was done at the recent convocation of the Holy Assembly of Bishops of our Church (not "his proclamation as a saint" by the "Synod of the SPC", as the unknowing know-it-all M.Đ. writes, in addition to a host of other lies and misinformation).

Đorđević's article is full of all kinds of sage commissarisms, such as the incoherent mention of St Cyprian of Carthage as "now certainly outdated" (according to whom? - who but the petty politician Mirko Đorđević?). And further on, Communist lies about Nikolai's "support for the ideology of Ljotić" (the recently studied German UDBA file on Bishop Nikolai says quite the opposite: Nikolai was never a "Ljotić idealogue"); and that he was "a man of hate," which the great Nikolai never was. This is followed by the slanderous claim that Justin was "the head of the so-called secret commission" of Nedić and his minister, Jonić, although we know that Justin was not, because of opposition from the German occupiers, and in the end returned to his faculty. During that entire time he was suspect by the government during the occupation and after the occupation (the name of Dušan Glumac is cited by M.Đ. in a distorted light), like we also know that Justin's proposal on relations between the Church and state (which we have published) was not accepted at the Ravna Gora congress in the village of Ba, because Justin was always an advocate of freedom for the Church in opposition to any state. His next lie is how Nikolai "fled from Yugoslavia", although we know that he was taken to the German concentration camp Dachau and subsequently proclaimed by Tito's communist regime as "public enemy number one"(his picture with this caption has been exhibited in the National Museum in Belgrade). This is followed by the ignorant assertion that "an Oxford University commission" rejected Justin's doctoral thesis on Dostoevsky, although Justin at that time was studying at a university extension seminary for Serbian refugee students, and that is why he went to Athens in 1921 to acquire his university degree, with which he could then write and defend his doctorate in Athens. Then we have the dilettante thesis that "no one yet has analyzed how much Justin as a dogmatist owes to Antonije Hrapovicki", clueless about the existence of the fundamental study of Dr. Bogdan Lubardić on the relationship between Justin and the Russian philosophical and theological tradition. Furthermore, he says Justin "gives the impression of being anti-historical and old-fashioned"! And an even more stupid claim - that Justin is regarded as "just an example of school theology" when quite the reverse is true, as attested by Justin's enormous influence throughout the Orthodox world precisely because of his neopatristic synthesis, the complete opposite of "school theology", which is actually represented, albeit in dilettante fashion, by the highly learned and all-knowing Mirko Đorđević because it is the only thing he knows.

The pretentiousness of this dilettante "religious analyst" when he proclaims judgments such as those in "A Surplus of Saints" as "an act of canonization of a purely political nature and has brought nothing good to either the Church nor the Serbian state"(!) - for only M. Đ. has been invited to assess and evaluate what is "good" for the Serbs and Serbia. We should also mention Đorđević's lethargy and backwardness in following the critical publications and translations into world languages of the collected works of Father Justin. If this was not the case, he would have looked, at least superficially, at the 20 volume collection of Justin's works, as well as the latest edition on Justin's Notes on Ecumenism where Justin - unlike the narrowly conservative Artemije - shows himself to be a theologian and prophet of theanthropic ecumenism, which encompasses everything related to logos, assembly, all-human, because according to him "ecumenism is the essence of the Church."

Đorđević has no idea how the Orthodox Christian world has long accepted Father Justin as a saint and theologian of universal significance (soon there is to be an international symposium about him in Southern Italy), and the Serbian Church has already been celebrating him as such for several decades, that is, even before his addition by assembly in the diptych of saints (which is erroneously called "canonization").

To conclude in Đorđević's own words, placed in the right context: it is time, indeed, to have more intelligent and sensible "religious analysts" and not just self-proclaimed and self-inflated "petty political" commissars "for religious issues".

+ Bishop Atanasije (Jevtić)

Source
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 9:58 AM 1 comment: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Modern Saints and Elders
Reactions: 

Are Christians Narrow Minded?

Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 9:07 AM 1 comment: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Apologetics
Reactions: 

The Holy Spirit As Comforter


By St. Nikolai Velimirovich

"But the Comforter, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My Name, He shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said to you" (John 14:26).

What practical meaning do these words have, if not that it is necessary that we pray daily that the Holy Spirit be sent to us just as we pray every day for our daily bread? God is willing to send us the Holy Spirit every day but He seeks that we pray daily for the Holy Spirit. For as in regard to bread which is at one time abundant and at another time scarce, so it is also in regard to the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit comes to us and departs from us, according to our zealousness and our slothfulness in prayer, according to our good deeds and our patience. That is the reason why the Church established that morning services begin with an invocation of the Holy Spirit: "O Heavenly King, Comforter, Spirit of Truth, Come!", and after that comes the prayer: "give us this day our daily bread!" Why? Because, without the Holy Spirit we do not even know how to use bread as it should be used for our salvation.

"He shall teach you all things." That is: every day and every night, according to the conditions and circumstances in which you will find yourself in, He will direct you, counsel you, teach you what you should think, what you should say and what you should do. For that reason, implore from God only the Holy Spirit and all else He Himself will bring with Him all that you will need at that particular moment. When the Holy Spirit shall descend upon you, you will know all, understand all and you will be capable of all that is necessary.

"And bring all things to your remembrance whatsoever I have said to you." That is: do not be afraid that you will forget my teaching and my words. The Holy Spirit also knows all that I know so when He will be present in you all My teaching will be present in you, together with Him.

O Lord, Holy Spirit, deign to descend upon us not according to our merits but according to the merits of the Lord Jesus and according to Your infinite goodness. To You be glory and thanks always. Amen.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 9:01 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: God, New Testament, Pascha and the Pentecostarion
Reactions: 

Celebrating Pentecost Between Heaven and Earth In Serbia


Rumija is a mountain in South Montenegro. The highest point of Rumija Mountain is Rumija, which is 1,594 m (5,230 ft) high.

Rumija rises above the town of Bar, and is a natural Dinaric barrier, separating Adriatic Sea from Skadar Lake basin.

The Rumija Mountain is a site of great religious significance. The Cross of Jovan Vladimir is carried every year on the Feast of Pentecost from the village of Velji Mikulići to the summit of Rumija. Traditionally, in addition to Orthodox Christians of Bar area, Catholics and Muslims also take part in the procession and ascent to Rumija summit.

In 2005, Serbian Orthodox Church mounted a metal church building to the summit, by means of Air Force of Serbia and Montenegro helicopter. This was a highly controversial issue, as building of the church was not approved by Montenegrin authorities. The use of the Air Force helicopter was perceived by some as a provocation in the wake of Montenegrin independence referendum. As of 2011, the church is still standing.

Source




Cross of Vladimir

The cross, which by tradition is the one that Jovan Vladimir held in his hands when he was martyred, is a highly valued relic. For centuries, it has been under the care of the Andrović family from the village Velji Mikulići near Bar. According to the Androvićs, a man whom they describe as a priest or a nobleman was the first who had kept the cross with the pledge that he and his descendants would preserve it. The Androvićs acquired it when a daughter of that man's last male descendant married one of them, and brought the cross as a part of her dowry. They have kept it as the greatest value, protecting it with their lives. Its location has always been known only to two oldest male members of the family.

According to a research by Russian historian Ivan Yastrebov, after Vladimir's death Kosara brought the cross from Prespa to Krajina. It was kept with other relics at the Monastery of the Most Holy Theotokos. At the peak of Islamization of this region in the 18th century, the monastery was torn down, and the cross was given to the people of Krajina. They regarded it as a protector of the clan and a symbol of rich harvest, and kept it as a great sanctity, although they converted to Islam. Yastrebov concludes that the cross was taken from them by the neighboring Mrkojevići clan, who then ceded it to the Androvićs. The cross, made of yew wood, was plated with silver at the end of the 16th century. A brass ball was fixed at its bottom, into which a stick is inserted when the cross is carried. It is 45 cm high, 38 cm wide, and 2.5 cm thick.

The cross, followed by a religious procession, is carried every year on the Feast of Pentecost from Velji Mikulići to the summit of Mount Rumija. All the participants in this celebration gather at Velji Mikulići the day before. The procession is preceded by a liturgy in the village's Church of Saint Nicholas, which begins at midnight. After the liturgy, at about one o'clock a.m., the ascent begins up a steep path to the 1593-meter-high summit of Rumija. At the head of the procession is the cross, carried by a member of the Andrović family, a priest goes behind him, and then follow the other participants. Among the guests are also Catholics and Muslims of the region. It is carefully observed that no one comes ahead of the cross; doing that is considered a bad omen. The ascending devotees sing:

Krste nosim,
Boga molim,
Gospodi pomiluj.

I carry the cross,
I pray to God,
Lord, have mercy.


A tradition has it that a church dedicated to the Holy Trinity stood at the summit, built by Jovan Vladimir, and razed by Ottomans. There was, therefore, a custom to pick up a stone at a certain distance from the peak, and carry it to that destination. It was believed, when a sufficient quantity of stones were collected, the church would rebuild itself. A church building dedicated to the Holy Trinity stands there again since 2005, erected and consecrated by the Serbian Orthodox Church. The procession arrives at the mountain peak before dawn, and at sunrise the morning liturgy begins. After the prayers are offered at the summit, the procession goes back to Velji Mikulići, again following the cross. On the way back, some people pick a medicinal plant called the red root of Rumija. The procession ends at the Church of Saint Nicholas, and folk festivities in Velji Mikulići continue until late at night.

From century to century, the Cross of Vladimir has bathed in the sun's rays at the peak of Rumija on every Feast of Pentecost, excepting the period from 1959 to 1984, when the celebration was not held. Its course was somewhat changed during the 1999 bombings: for security reasons, the cross was not carried up to the summit, and it was shown, for the first time, during the midnight liturgy in the Church of Saint Nicholas. That has been a curiosity, because people normally cannot see the cross before the start of the procession.

Source

Read also: Serbia and Montenegro: The Politics Of Churches And Helicopters

See a more complete video here.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 7:52 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Orthodoxy in Serbia, Pascha and the Pentecostarion
Reactions: 
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
View mobile version
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Related Posts with Thumbnails