Created in 1422 by Cristoforo Buondelmonti, this is the oldest surviving map of Constantinople and the only one that predates the Ottoman conquest.Bessarion writes to Theodoros II Palaiologos the following about Constantinople in 1436, which was seventeen years before its fall to the Ottomans:
On the one side you will see the abundance and fineness of holy things, even more abundant than they are fine, and even better than they are abundant. On another side you will see the walls and towers and the defense circuit of the city, whose measure and strength no one can wonder enough at, and on yet another the brilliance of the cities houses and the overwhelming pride in public show. On still another you will see the massiveness of the public buildings and their extent, evidences of royal indulgence and the luxury of power. You will see the size and beauty of these and you will hear much recounted to you about them. For this city is bejewelled in the eyes of those who see it beyond any other, and in those who remember it, even beyond reality, so that how could you pass through it without marvelling at many things, you who used to clap and dance with pleasure and seemed to see it almost as if you were one with those who longed for it.
But why do I speak of this, when you are in the presence of even more. You are where everything is holy, and every godly thing has been stored up as if this city had become a sort of treasury for God, curating for him every holy bone from the martyrs, every relic of priests and holy superiors, of all who have served God. These you could not find time enough for walking about with eagerness and desire, embracing them and gathering in their grace, for their beauty surrounds you from every side in every way.
Source






This passage is extracted from a larger context as if it were a statement of fact, rather than a piece of grandiose rhetoric written, as I have remarked elsewhere, with a tone of asphyxiating obsequiousness that is rather uncharacteristic of Bessarion. It tells us something about the tattered grandeur of 1436 Constantinople, and a lot about the cultural reaction to the city even in its decline, but the letter as a whole, and even more, a succeeding letter, tells us more about the emotional instability and sterility of the unfortunate Theodore II and how Bessarion felt he had to address that.
ReplyDeleteAs the translator, I should be sorry to see this misleading fragment make its way into uncritical popular history as specious evidence for a view of the city that was simply no longer true.
I think its obvious that he is trying to defend the City, but I don't think he is lying as you seem to imply. The magnificence of the City is recounted here in its history, its holiness, and plainly the fact that it still stands as a monument to God's glory. I think any Orthodox Christian can better understand rather than a historian who doesn't consider this fact.
ReplyDeleteYou do realize that what Bessarion really thought about CP is illustrated in the fact that he left it in 1437, joined the Western Rite, returned in 1440 long enough to pack up his books, & then went to live in Italy.
ReplyDeleteOf course Bessarion wasn't Orthodox, but this does not diminish the fact that he saw its magnificence in its sacred past, despite the obvious decline it was in from a few centuries earlier. Bessarion here is talking about a spiritual and historical magnificence, not a present secular and physical one.
ReplyDelete