MYSTAGOGY

The Weblog Of John Sanidopoulos

BannerFans.com
  • Home
  • ABOUT
  • SAINTS & FEASTS
  • RESOURCES
  • BOOKSTORE
  • DONATE
Loading...

MYSTAGOGY

MYSTAGOGY
My Photo
J.Sanidopoulos
This weblog offers insights and analysis on various matters of life and thought from a 21st century Orthodox Christian perspective, among other things.
View my complete profile
http://www.facebookloginhut.com/facebook-login/ http://www.facebookloginhut.com/facebook-login/

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Support Mystagogy

Mystagogy relies on your financial support to continue and to expand. We hope you value what is offered here. If so, please show your support with either a one-time donation or a monthly subscription by clicking here: DONATE

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (366)
    • ►  June (40)
    • ►  May (71)
    • ►  April (67)
    • ►  March (77)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (102)
  • ►  2012 (1047)
    • ►  December (99)
    • ►  November (59)
    • ►  October (69)
    • ►  September (58)
    • ►  August (74)
    • ►  July (116)
    • ►  June (121)
    • ►  May (125)
    • ►  April (138)
    • ►  March (96)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (89)
  • ►  2011 (1427)
    • ►  December (60)
    • ►  November (65)
    • ►  October (84)
    • ►  September (63)
    • ►  August (107)
    • ►  July (40)
    • ►  June (133)
    • ►  May (161)
    • ►  April (198)
    • ►  March (174)
    • ►  February (161)
    • ►  January (181)
  • ▼  2010 (2462)
    • ►  December (221)
    • ►  November (211)
    • ►  October (149)
    • ►  September (200)
    • ►  August (187)
    • ►  July (209)
    • ►  June (170)
    • ►  May (199)
    • ▼  April (236)
      • New Martyr Argyre of Proussa: Patron Saint of Marr...
      • Behold, How a Righteous Man Dies!
      • Philotimo: Greece's Most Valuable Commodity
      • Noah’s Ark on Mars
      • Humans and Chimps Not So Genetically Similar After...
      • St. Basil of Ostrog and U.S. Senator Bill Barr
      • Fr. Justin Popovich & Fr. Simeon of Dajbabe Glorif...
      • Over 527,000 Guatemalans Received Into Orthodoxy
      • Archb. Demetrios Responds to Resignation Rumors
      • Meet the Forger of "The Protocols of Zion": Mathie...
      • Saint Nektary of Optina and the Uncreated Light
      • Saint Nektary of Optina and the Arts
      • Holy Apostles Jason and Sosipater of Kerkyra
      • On Wandering Thoughts During Church Services
      • Without...
      • 1000 Ex-Scientology Church Members Speak Out
      • Elder Nikolai Gurianov and the Demon Possessed Wom...
      • St. Basil the Great on the Book of Psalms
      • The Feast of Mid-Pentecost and the Pentecostarion
      • Video of Patriarch Irenaios Under House Arrest
      • Prayer of the Optina Elders
      • On Bearing Insults
      • The Islamic Ideology Known as "The Narrative"
      • The 'Protocols of Zion' in Orthodoxy and Its Unfor...
      • What Is the Mark of the True Christian?
      • The True Faith Must Be Persecuted In This World
      • Could This Be Noah's Ark?
      • Hawking Suffers Paranoid Delusions
      • Media Scares: From the Printing Press to Facebook
      • 9 Sites of Cult Massacres and Suicides
      • The 5 Most Fraudulent Psychics of All-Time
      • No Evidence For European Ash Cloud
      • Is Orthodoxy a Religion?
      • Why We Need Religion
      • 72% of Millennials 'More Spiritual Than Religious'...
      • Bad Habits Can Age You by 12 Years, Study Suggests...
      • Patriarch Theophilos of Jerusalem on the Holy Ligh...
      • M.I.A's Controversial New Video "Born Free"
      • Religions NOT Different Paths to the Same Wisdom
      • The Authenticity of “Secret Mark”
      • Did I Find King David’s Palace?
      • Kneeling In Church On Sundays
      • The Ascetic and the Thief
      • Top Ten Things to Build a Bridge and Get Over
      • If You Want To Avoid Cancer, Live Like A Monk
      • Saint Joannicius of Devic
      • Elder Paisios on Marriage and Divorce
      • Patriarch Ilia II: 'Most Trusted Man in Georgia'
      • Ghost and Demonic Sightings Highest in 25 Years
      • 700 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of ...
      • On Idleness and the Apostolic Love for Labor
      • Interview About Elder Ephraim's Book on Elder Jose...
      • Old Calendarism and the Monastery of Esphigmenou
      • Saint Mark the Apostle and Evangelist
      • Homily for the Sunday of the Paralytic
      • Pascha in Kolwezi, Congo
      • Chomsky Warns of Rise of the Far Right in the U.S....
      • Church of Scientology Responds to Russian Ban
      • James Randi's Fiery Takedown of Psychic Fraud
      • On the Translation of Liturgical Texts (Part 4 of ...
      • Traditional Greek Songs to Saint George
      • Eurovision Contestant Visits Ecumenical Patriarch
      • Orthodoxy in Kenya
      • Fear Evil Like Fire
      • The Agnostic Professor and the Tribal Chief
      • On The Building Of Churches
      • Mount Athos: The Castle of Orthodoxy
      • Saint George: A Saint for the Desperate
      • Saint George Appears to Saint Arsenios of Paros
      • Loutro Traianoupolis: Where Christians and Muslims...
      • The Cell of Saint George "The Revealed One"
      • Miracles of St. George to Muslims at Koudouna
      • 6th-11th Century References to Saint George
      • A Vision of Saint George the Great Martyr In Glory...
      • Chapel of St. George at Mystras
      • A Song About the "Jesus Prayer"
      • Archbishop Irenaios of Crete Clarifies his Encycli...
      • On the Translation of Liturgical Texts (Part 3 of ...
      • A Second Resurrection at the Monastery of St. Niko...
      • A Syrian Style Easter
      • Archbishop of Crete on Social Networking and Clerg...
      • The Translation of Liturgical Texts In Russia
      • The Rapture – Indisputable Christian Heresy
      • The Theft of Yoga
      • Russia Society Dominated by ‘Baptized Godless,’ Mi...
      • On the Translation of Liturgical Texts (Part 2 of ...
      • Miracles of the Right Hand of St. John the Baptist...
      • An Ant Superhighway
      • A Parable of the Elder Barlaam
      • Trials of Dating in College
      • Guard Your Heart
      • Constantinople's Volcanic Twilight
      • On the Translation of Liturgical Texts (Part 1 of ...
      • Child Martyr Gabriel of Zabludov, Poland (+ 1690)
      • On Guardian Angels
      • The Volcanic Ashes of Constantinople In 472 AD
      • Icons of the Nicene Creed
      • "Atheism Turns People Into Brutes" Says Russian Pa...
      • Europe's Largest Church To Be Built In Kiev
      • Holy New Martyr Agathangelos of Esphigmenou
      • On Empty Philosophy, Myths and Worldy Teaching
      • Elderly Woman, 92, Becomes Orthodox Nun
      • On Liturgical Language and Understanding
      • The Cross Glistens With the Blood of the Martyrs
      • The Myrrh-Streaming Skulls of Panahrantos Monaster...
      • New Martyrs of Optina Monastery (+ April 18, 1993)...
      • New Martyr John the New of Ioannina
      • The Holy Myrrhbearers and Contemporary Christian W...
      • Homily For the Sunday of The Myrrhbearing Women
      • Saint Tounom the Emir (+ 18 April 1579)
      • New Abbot at Hilandari Monastery on Mount Athos
      • The Praying Parrot
      • Newly-Revealed Martyrs Leonidas and His Companions...
      • St. Makarios of Corinth: Author of the Philokalic ...
      • St. Makarios Notaras and Patmos
      • Five Myths About the Catholic Sexual Abuse Scandal...
      • The Cave of the Apocalypse in Patmos
      • Trust God's Will and Hope in God's Judgment
      • Relic of St. Nikodemos Miraculously Returned
      • Weeping Icon of the Mother of God 'Ilyin Chernigov...
      • Elder Amphilochios Makris of Patmos
      • Interview With Elder Tadej (Thaddeus) of Vitovnica...
      • Darwinists at NASA Getting Sued, What You Can Do
      • Human Sacrifice Suspected in West Bengal Temple
      • The Trustworthiness of Beards
      • Posthumous Award for the King Who Saved Jews
      • Greek Synod Condemns Liturgy in Modern Greek
      • The Skull of St. Helen of Sinope in Slovakia
      • The Resurrection of Christ is the Annihilation of ...
      • The Eagle and the Rooster: A Parable of St. Siloua...
      • Patriarch of Jerusalem Meets With Prince of Qatar
      • Believe In God, Not Yourself
      • From Pascha to Pentecost
      • Love God As a Son and Fear Him As a Slave
      • Saints Anthony, John, and Eustathius of Lithuania
      • The Personal Experience of All the Apostles
      • Orthodox Nun Stops Suicide Surge in Russian Villag...
      • The Jesus We'll Never Know
      • Former Atheist Philosopher Anthony Flew Is Dead
      • Hindu Absurdity of the Week: The Dog God
      • My Lord and My God!
      • St. Crescens Served God In Both Body and Soul
      • Vatican Does Not Recognize Kosovo Independence
      • Does Reason Know What It Is Missing?
      • Russian President's Life Changed After Baptism
      • Russians Save Zacchaeus' Sycamore Tree
      • Russian Mission to Moscow Chinese
      • Tuesday of St. Thomas: Radonitsa (Day of Rejoicing...
      • Serbia: the Birthplace of 18 Roman Emperors
      • The Challenge of Our Time
      • The Benefits of Acts of Charity for the Dead
      • Honoring the Lord's Day
      • A Family Feud Over New Hominid Fossil Discovery
      • A Cartoon About Basic Mormon Doctrines
      • In Praise of Patriarchy
      • The Orthodox Church in America and Its Future
      • On Bar Codes and Other Apocalyptic Myths
      • The Unceasing Struggles of the Faithful
      • The Symbol of Georgian National and Spiritual Revi...
      • Saint Antipas: A Martyr of the Apocalypse
      • Thomas Didn't Believe So That All May Believe
      • Doubting Thomas
      • Homily for the Sunday of Saint Thomas
      • Orthodox Bulgaria Marks Sunday of St. Thomas
      • Feast of the Synaxis of the Holy Kollyvades Father...
      • "The Byzantine Empire Sucks": A Cynical View
      • Experiences of the Risen Jesus
      • The Jesus Trilemma: Liar, Lunatic or Lord
      • The "Miracle" of the Universe
      • The Zoodochos Pege (Life-Giving Spring) at Baloukl...
      • St. Anthony's Orthodox Monastery in Arizona
      • Were We Born To Believe?
      • Do Angels and Demons Exist: Contemporary Perspecti...
      • The Quackery of Deepak Chopra
      • Pascha at Vatopaidi Monastery
      • 179 Newly-Revealed Martyrs of Ntaou Penteli
      • Holy Archangels Monastery in Texas
      • Fighting Words From Turkish Prime Minister
      • Srebrenitsa Massacre: Genocide of Muslims or Serbs...
      • With What Kind of Body Will The Dead Rise?
      • St Justin Popovich of Chelije in Serbia (+1979)
      • Monastery of St. Savvas th New in Kalymnos
      • An Ode To Monasticism
      • Georgian Convicts Swap Cells For Monastery
      • Divine Love Surpasses Knowledge
      • World Council of Churches: The KGB Connection
      • Good and Wicked Priests
      • Evolution, Theistic Evolution, and Intelligent Des...
      • A Miracle of Sts. Raphael, Nicholas and Irene
      • St. Eutychius and the Condemnation of Heretics Aft...
      • 6,000 Martyrs of the St David Gareji Monastery
      • How An Atheist Came To Believe in the Resurrection...
      • Siberian Pastor Converts Community to Orthodoxy
      • Jesus Good / Church Necessary: Churches Fail Becau...
      • Catholic Celibacy Turns Some to Orthodoxy
      • Paschal Litany on Mount Athos for Bright Week
      • Glorify God, Don't Describe Him
      • What Is "Bright Week"?
      • Bright Week Customs In Northern Greece
      • The Burning of Judas in Greece
      • Paschal Fireworks Battle In Chios
      • Syrian Christians Unite for Easter
      • The Paschal Martyrdom of Neomartyr Panagiotis
      • St. Mark the Anchorite: The Saint Who Moved Mounta...
      • Pascha in a Russian Soccer Stadium
      • The Three Visits of Mary Magdalene to the Tomb of ...
      • A Clear Vision of Christ's Resurrection
      • The Glory of St. Joseph the Hymnographer
      • A Paschal Homily of Blessed Justin of Chelije
      • Pascha at Dionysiou Monastery on Mount Athos
      • The Holy Light (Fire) of Jerusalem 2010
      • The Red Eggs of Pascha
      • The Torn Column: Pascha 1579 AD
      • Vatopaidi Monastery: Lamentations and Epitaphios
      • The Horror of Nature at the Death of Christ
      • The Descent of Christ Into Hades
      • Great and Holy Saturday: The Forgotten Feast
      • St. Amphilochios of Iconium: On the Burial of Our ...
      • Sermon for Great and Holy Friday
      • The Pain of the Mother of God
      • Why The Good Thief Was Pardoned
      • What Christ Accomplished on the Cross
      • Protestants To Join Orthodoxy on Holy Saturday
      • 90 Percent of Russians Will Celebrate Easter
      • Easter on the Greek Island of Paros
      • The Miraculous Opening of Graves After the Crucifi...
      • The King Who Does Not Defend Himself
      • Epithets for the Passion of Christ
      • The Two Evil Deeds of Israel Against Jesus
      • "Like A Lamb Lead To The Slaughter"
      • The Lord Responds To His Mockers
      • On Holy Week: Elder Ephraim of Arizona
      • The Holy Communion of Judas and our Communion
      • St. Mary of Egypt and Holy Thursday
      • St. Mary of Egypt: A Soldier of Christ
      • 3 New Confessors of the Romanian Orthodox Church
    • ►  March (240)
    • ►  February (227)
    • ►  January (213)
  • ►  2009 (874)
    • ►  December (160)
    • ►  November (124)
    • ►  October (140)
    • ►  September (116)
    • ►  August (86)
    • ►  July (97)
    • ►  June (60)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (49)

Topics

  • Abortion (1)
  • Alexandros Papadiamandis (1)
  • Almsgiving (4)
  • America (156)
  • Angels (52)
  • Anglicans (3)
  • Annunciation (2)
  • Anthony the Great (3)
  • Anthropology (23)
  • Antiochian Archdiocese of America (10)
  • Apocrypha (1)
  • Apologetics (81)
  • Apostles and Early Church (164)
  • Art (41)
  • Athanasius the Great (3)
  • Atheism-Agnosticism-Skepticism (207)
  • Augustine of Hippo (4)
  • Balkans and Russia (61)
  • Basil the Great (3)
  • Bible (41)
  • Bible Difficulties (1)
  • Biblical and Christian Archaeology (11)
  • Biblical and Christian Archeology (94)
  • Biblical Criticism (30)
  • Bioethics (1)
  • Byzantine Music (1)
  • C.S. Lewis (2)
  • Calendar Issue (3)
  • Canon Law (36)
  • Catholicism and Papacy (158)
  • Celtic Saints (1)
  • Childless Mothers (1)
  • Christian Living (172)
  • Christology (63)
  • Church and Society (1)
  • Church History (50)
  • Climate Change (1)
  • Conspiracies (93)
  • Constantine the Great (5)
  • Coptic Church (44)
  • Cross (91)
  • Cults (83)
  • Cyril and Methodios (1)
  • Cyril Loukaris (1)
  • Cyril of Jerusalem (1)
  • Demetrios of Thessaloniki (2)
  • Demonology (7)
  • Desert Fathers (12)
  • Divine Liturgy (8)
  • Divorce (5)
  • Documentaries (9)
  • Dormition Fast (35)
  • Ecclesiology (86)
  • Ecumenical Patriarchate (158)
  • Ecumenical Synods (7)
  • Ecumenism (106)
  • Elder Aimilianos of Simonopetra (2)
  • Elder Cleopa of Romania (2)
  • Elder Ephraim Katounakiotis (2)
  • Elder Epiphanios Theodoropoulos (2)
  • Elder Eusebius Yiannakakis (1)
  • Elder Iakovos of Evia (1)
  • Elder Paisios the Athonite (34)
  • Elder Porphyrios (7)
  • Elder Sophrony of Essex (6)
  • Entrance of the Theotokos (2)
  • Ephraim of Nea Makri (1)
  • Ephraim the Syrian (2)
  • Eschatology/Death (181)
  • Ethical and Moral Issues (70)
  • Europe (85)
  • Events (14)
  • Family and Parish (81)
  • Famous People (6)
  • Fasting (5)
  • Feasts of the Church (95)
  • Fr. George Florovsky (4)
  • Fr. George Metallinos (1)
  • Fr. John Romanides (7)
  • Fr. Seraphim Rose (1)
  • Freemasonry (1)
  • Funny (48)
  • George the Great Martyr (6)
  • Globalization (1)
  • God (69)
  • Gothic and Horror (38)
  • Great Lent (9)
  • Great Lent and Holy Week (333)
  • Greece and Greeks (213)
  • Greek Archdiocese of America (GOA) (66)
  • Gregory of Nyssa (1)
  • Gregory Palamas (9)
  • Gregory the Theologian (2)
  • Hagia Sophia (8)
  • Halki Seminary (2)
  • Halloween (5)
  • Happiness (1)
  • Health (1)
  • Health and Creation (138)
  • Heresy (102)
  • Holidays (17)
  • Holy Light (1)
  • Holy Matrimony (2)
  • Holy Mysteries (Sacraments) (142)
  • Holy Unction (1)
  • Holy Week (27)
  • Homosexuality (2)
  • Iconography (293)
  • Isaac the Syrian (3)
  • John Chrysostom (6)
  • John Climacus (2)
  • John the Baptist (10)
  • Judging (1)
  • Justin Popovic (1)
  • Lay Holiness (2)
  • Literature (28)
  • Literature and Book Reviews (89)
  • Liturgics (93)
  • Logic / Reason (1)
  • Luke of Crimea (2)
  • Mariology (274)
  • Marital and Relationship Issues (97)
  • Maximus the Confessor (2)
  • Maximus the Greek (2)
  • Medieval History and Theology (58)
  • Meteora (3)
  • Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos (21)
  • Middle East (55)
  • Miracles (454)
  • Missions (105)
  • Modern Saints and Elders (537)
  • Modernity (30)
  • Monasticism (129)
  • Monk Moses the Athonite (6)
  • Moral Stories (2)
  • Moscow Patriarchate (1)
  • Mothers (2)
  • Mount Athos (312)
  • Movies (132)
  • Music (112)
  • My Family and Friends (25)
  • My Writings (1)
  • N.T. - Acts of the Apostles (2)
  • N.T. - Colossians (1)
  • N.T. - John (4)
  • N.T. - Luke (1)
  • N.T. - Mark (6)
  • N.T. - Matthew (4)
  • N.T. - Revelation (1)
  • N.T. 1 Corinthians (1)
  • N.T. 1 Timothy (1)
  • N.T. Hebrews (1)
  • N.T. Luke (3)
  • Nationalism (6)
  • Nativity and Theophany (234)
  • Nektarios of Aegina (6)
  • Neomartys Under Turks (11)
  • New England (19)
  • New Martyrs Under Turks (2)
  • New Testament (181)
  • New Testament Exegesis (7)
  • Newly-Revealed Saints (3)
  • Nicholas of Myra (8)
  • Nicolae Steinhardt (3)
  • Nikephoros the Leper (2)
  • Nikodemos the Hagiorite (2)
  • Nikolai Velimirovich (8)
  • O.T. - Genesis (1)
  • Old Testament (150)
  • Old Testament Exegesis (9)
  • Oriental Orthodox (2)
  • Orthodox Church In America (OCA) (13)
  • Orthodox Converts (101)
  • Orthodox Diaspora (10)
  • Orthodox Extremism (150)
  • Orthodox Theologians (66)
  • Orthodoxy (39)
  • Orthodoxy in Abkhazia (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Africa (64)
  • Orthodoxy in Albania (13)
  • Orthodoxy in America (142)
  • Orthodoxy in Armenia (18)
  • Orthodoxy in Asia (46)
  • Orthodoxy in Asia Minor (171)
  • Orthodoxy in Australia (6)
  • Orthodoxy in Bulgaria (99)
  • Orthodoxy in Crete (8)
  • Orthodoxy in Cyprus (100)
  • Orthodoxy in Czech Republic (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Estonia (3)
  • Orthodoxy in Ethiopia (8)
  • Orthodoxy in Finland (2)
  • Orthodoxy in France (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Georgia (71)
  • Orthodoxy in Germany (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Greece (458)
  • Orthodoxy In Holy Land (22)
  • Orthodoxy In Israel (140)
  • Orthodoxy in Italy (3)
  • Orthodoxy in Kazakhstan (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Latin America (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Lebanon (1)
  • Orthodoxy in Macedonia (16)
  • Orthodoxy in Mainland Greece (6)
  • Orthodoxy in Moldava (4)
  • Orthodoxy in Poland (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Romania (88)
  • Orthodoxy in Russia (416)
  • Orthodoxy in Serbia (140)
  • Orthodoxy in Syria (7)
  • Orthodoxy in the Cyclades (4)
  • Orthodoxy in the Dodecanese (12)
  • Orthodoxy in the Ionian Islands (3)
  • Orthodoxy in the Saronic Islands (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Thessaloniki (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Ukraine (60)
  • Orthodoxy in Uzbekistan (2)
  • Orthodoxy in Western Europe (73)
  • Ottoman Occupation (7)
  • Paganism and the New Age Movement (98)
  • Panteleimon the Martyr (1)
  • Paranormal and the Occult (198)
  • Pascha and the Pentecostarion (256)
  • Patriarchate of Alexandria (1)
  • Patriarchate of Antioch (5)
  • Patriarchate of Russia (1)
  • Patristic Writings (16)
  • Patristics (325)
  • Pentecostalism (4)
  • Personhood (1)
  • Philanthropy (11)
  • Philosophy (82)
  • Photios Kontoglou (3)
  • Photis Kontoglou (1)
  • Pneumatology (3)
  • Podcast (2)
  • Politics (143)
  • Polls (2)
  • Pop Culture (54)
  • Postmodernism (6)
  • Prayer (4)
  • Prayer / Fasting / Alms (159)
  • Priesthood (10)
  • Prison Ministry (6)
  • Prophecies (56)
  • Protestantism (120)
  • Psychology (73)
  • Religion (85)
  • Religion: Buddhism (19)
  • Religion: Hinduism (41)
  • Religion: Islam (185)
  • Religion: Jews and Judaism (58)
  • Repentance and Confession (3)
  • Roman (Byzantine) Empire (203)
  • Romiosini (35)
  • Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (ROCOR) (6)
  • Saint Nicholas (4)
  • Saints (847)
  • Saints of Africa (1)
  • Saints of America (3)
  • Saints of Crete (8)
  • Saints of Georgia (4)
  • Saints of Ionian Islands (8)
  • Saints of Lesvos (1)
  • Saints of Mainland Greece (16)
  • Saints of Mount Athos (9)
  • Saints of Patmos (1)
  • Saints of Romania (3)
  • Saints of Russia (9)
  • Saints of Scotland (2)
  • Saints of Serbia (4)
  • Saints of the Cyclades (2)
  • Saints of the Dodecanese (2)
  • Saints of the Holy Lnd (1)
  • Saints of Ukraine (5)
  • Scandal (56)
  • Science (2)
  • Science-Intelligent Design-Darwinism (249)
  • Secularism (97)
  • Seraphim of Sarov (2)
  • Sexual and Gender Issues (107)
  • Shrines and Relics (564)
  • Soteriology (80)
  • Spiritual Fatherhood (4)
  • Spirituality (221)
  • Sports (20)
  • sShrines and Relics (1)
  • St. Cyril Loukaris (1)
  • St. John of Kronstadt (1)
  • st. John the Baptist (2)
  • St. John the Russian (1)
  • St. Luke of Simferopol (1)
  • St. Maximus the Confessor (1)
  • St. Nektarios (2)
  • St. Nikodemos the Hagiorite (1)
  • St. Nikolai Velimirovich (3)
  • Strange (37)
  • Sts. Bartholomew and John (1)
  • Substance Issues (14)
  • Symeon the New Theologian (3)
  • Television and Media (45)
  • Television and Media. (1)
  • Theodicy/Evil/Suffering (84)
  • Theology (98)
  • Theophilos of Campania (1)
  • Theotokos Icons (19)
  • Tradition (62)
  • Triodion (8)
  • UFO's and Alien Life (2)
  • Uniates (6)
  • v (1)
  • Vice and Sin (111)
  • video (1)
  • Videos (80)
  • Violence-Crime-Persecution (161)
  • Virtue (118)
  • Youth Ministry (107)

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
All Comments
Atom
All Comments

Visitor Map
Create your own visitor map!

Monday, April 12, 2010

The Challenge of Our Time


by V. Rev. Georges Florovsky

The great Russian bishop of the last century, Theophanes “The Recluse” (d. 1894), in one of his pastoral letters makes a startling statement. What the Russian Church most needed, he said, was “a band of firebrands,” which would set the world on fire. The incendiaries must be themselves burning and go around to inflame human minds and hearts. Theophanes did not trust a “residual Christianity.” Customs could be perpetuated by inertia, he said, but convictions and beliefs could be kept only by spiritual vigilance and continuous effort by the spirit. Theophanes felt that there was too much routine and convention in the life of Russian Christians. He anticipated a crisis and even a collapse. He resigned his diocese and retired to a monastery, because he felt that he could do much more service to the Church by writing books than by administering a bishopric.

Theophanes was a man of wide learning and experience. For some time he was Rector of the Theological Academy (in St. Petersburg). He traveled extensively in the Christian East and was intimately linked with Mount Athos. He was a good Greek scholar, and he used this knowledge for translations. He always insisted that he retired not for an advanced spiritual life (which is possible, and should be practiced for the ordinary life) but to have time and leisure for literary and scholarly work. He took to his monastic cell all his books, a selected library from which were not excluded books by Western scholars and secular literature. He wanted to know the world to which he had to bring the message of salvation. He did not dispute the labors and achievements of those who did not belong to the Orthodox communion of faith.

The retired bishop spent his time in writing: He translated “Philokalia,” [see Book Reviews ]; the works of St. Simeon the New Theologian; the ancient Monastic Rules (Eastern and Western); he published several volumes of his commentary on the Epistles of St. Paul, intended not so much for scholars, but to help all believers understand this inspired teaching; he wrote several books on Christian Ethics and Spirituality. Theophanes began every day with the Divine Liturgy, which he celebrated alone in his tiny domestic chapel, and he would use the inspiration of the daily communion for his scholarly and pastoral work.

The impact of Theophanes' writings on the life of the Russian Church was enormous. In his retirement, as a “recluse,” he was more influential than he could ever have been as administrator of a worldly diocese. He made Christian doctrine available for average Christians, for all Christians. He wanted to equip them with spiritual weapons for their Christian struggle. He required from all Christians — from clergy first of all — a thorough knowledge and understanding of our Holy Faith, which alone could save our life from unhealthy sentimentalism and imagination. He insisted on the study of the Scriptures and of the Holy Fathers.

Now, many years have passed since Theophanes' time. His worst anticipations were justified. The whole Orthodox Church — not only in Russia — is involved in a desperate struggle with the raging assault of godlessness and unbelief. Human souls are undergoing an incredible trial. But the protecting veil of Divine Mercy is spread over the suffering Church and the possessed world, and men are called to be Christ's witnesses: His Messengers and Apostles. The Church is essentially a missionary institution. One has to thank God for that army of new martyrs and confessors who have revealed or manifested the strength and the beauty of Christian Faith. And yet one should not be too easily satisfied with what has been done by others. So much has been left not done by us.

Let us confine our attention this time to one aspect of our Christian duty. Everyone knows that we are desperately short of books. Behind the “iron curtain” an impressive literature of atheism has been created and widely spread. Special colleges have been established to train people “for a godless ministry.” Textbooks on anti-religious propaganda, and on the methodology of godless preaching have been prepared for classrooms.

What is our response to this challenge? In the Ancient Church, the Holy Fathers met the challenge of the pagan world by an outpouring of Christian writings, attacking point by point the arguments of the opponents. What have we done in our own situation? Can we really meet the enemy on the field and save the victims of this unparalleled spiritual persecution?

The rusty weapons will not do. I am not speaking of the Holy Tradition, of the writings of the Holy Fathers, but of the inadequate books of the last century, which were so often ephemeral and rarely presented a sufficient interpretation of the Holy Tradition. Our theological production stopped years ago, and that stoppage testifies to our neglect of the teaching mission of the Church. Ignorance is growing in the Church and we are not alarmed!

Are there any books in which our Holy Orthodox Faith can be convincingly preached and commended to our own generation?

We in America, where the majority of Orthodox Christians are English-speaking, are in an especially difficult situation. There is no Orthodox literature in English. There are occasional books, often of modest quality, and rarely on the most urgent or basic subjects. The real problem, however, is not that of books, but of study. Each generation, especially in a new country, has to assess the Christian truth afresh, in continuous contact with the past, as well as in close contact with the changing present. It is not enough to learn by rote some ready answers. They may be perfectly right and correct. But we have to solve the questions by thinking through the answers and not by merely reciting formulas, sacred and perfect though they are. Listen to the searching man! He knows the formula, but cannot relate it to his existential questioning. Our Creed is a most perfect formula. How often do we recite it without conviction? Are we able to relate it to our urgent spiritual needs? How many Orthodox dispense with the Creed, because it has ceased to have for them any immediate spiritual appeal? The Creed is charged with an eternal and loving Truth. It is an eternal key to human unrest, but it needs interpretation. Otherwise we would not know how to fit the key in the lock.

What our present generation wants, especially in our country, is a true theological revival — a revival of a living theology, which would unlock for us that Truth which one can find in the Scriptures, in the Tradition, and in the Liturgical life of the Church, but which is sealed away from us by our ignorance and neglect. We need today more than ever before, precisely a “band of spiritual firebrands” who can inflame minds and hearts with the fire of a loving knowledge of God and Jesus Christ, the Redeemer. God calls us, in our generation, to be His witnesses and messengers. How can men believe if they do not hear the quickening Word? Even if we are men of unclean lips, let us respond to the Divine call, and the fire of the Spirit will cleanse us, for the ministry of the Word.

St. Vladimir's Seminary Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1, Fall 1952, pp. 3-5.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:49 AM 1 comment: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Orthodox Theologians, Orthodoxy in America, Theology
Reactions: 

The Benefits of Acts of Charity for the Dead


St Athanasia fell asleep in the Lord on August 14, 860.

The saint predicted that she would receive glory in Heaven forty days after her death. On the fortieth day, two devout sisters were granted to see St Athanasia and two radiant men standing before the royal doors of the iconostasis. They clothed her with a purple robe embroidered with gold, pearls, and precious stones. They set a crown on her head, handed her a gleaming staff, and led her through the royal doors into the altar.

Before her death, St Athanasia ordered the nuns to feed the poor for forty days following her departure. The sisters, however, did not fulfill her request and set out the memorial meal for only ten days. The saint appeared to some of the sisters and said, "Let everyone know that alms given for a departed soul for forty days after death, and food offered to the hungry, appease God. If the departed souls are sinful, they receive forgiveness from God. If they are righteous, then the good deeds bring God's mercy on the souls of those who perform them."

Then she thrust her staff into the ground and became invisible. The staff left behind sprouted the next day and became a live tree.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:18 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Eschatology/Death, Prayer / Fasting / Alms, Saints, Soteriology
Reactions: 

Honoring the Lord's Day


One day a week you should ‘keep holy’ (Ex. 20:8): that which is called the Lord’s day, because it is consecrated to the Lord, who on that day arose from the dead, disclosing and giving prior assurance of the general resurrection, when every earthly activity will come to an end. And you must not engage in any worldly activity that is not essential; and you must allow those who are under your authority and those who live with you to rest, so that together you may all glorify Him who redeemed us through His death and who arose from the dead and resurrected our human nature with Himself…

On this day you should go to the temple of God and attend the services held there and with sincere faith and a clean conscience you should receive the holy body and blood of Christ.

- St. Gregory Palamas
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 9:40 AM 3 comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Christian Living, Family and Parish
Reactions: 

A Family Feud Over New Hominid Fossil Discovery


“Hype and Over-Interpretation” Causing Family Feud Over New Hominid Fossil

by Casey Luskin

Long ago a wise king solved an interfamily dispute with a simple solution: split the baby. Now paleoanthropologists are fighting—with little resolution in sight—about how to interpret newly discovered hominid fossils, which comprise about 130 bones from multiple individuals. Focused on a single juvenile specimen, the debate is over whether the fossils represent human evolutionary ancestors, just a new species that split off and went extinct, or another previously known species of little significance to human evolution. While many news articles are touting the fossil as a human ancestor or even a "missing link" (see, for example, AOL news or the London Telegraph), what’s encouraging is a couple sources in the mainstream media (though just a couple) are functioning like actual real journalism outlets and citing a variety of credible authorities who dissent from the standard line that this fossil is a link in human evolution.

Read the rest here.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 8:51 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Science-Intelligent Design-Darwinism
Reactions: 

A Cartoon About Basic Mormon Doctrines



I showed this to a Mormon elder years ago and a missionary just to see their reaction. But all they wanted to talk about was a burning in their bosom and the wonders Mormonism would have in my family life. In other words, they did all they could to avoid discussing it.

Though I agree the video is a simplification, from my studies of Mormonism I think it accurately portrays true Mormon doctrines (some of which have been altered over the years to fit contemporary societal standards).

The source of this video provides references from Mormon sources to back up the origins of these doctrines below:

0:20 - 0:45 - King Follett Discourse (History of the Church Vol 6 pg 302-317)

0:54 - 1:00 - Abraham 3

1:03 - 2:20 - Gospel Principles Ch. 2-3

2:20 - 2:35 Official Statement by 1st presidency 08/17/49 and 08/17/51 and Joseph Fielding Smith in Doctrines of Salvation 1:65-66 2nd Nephi 5:21

2:38 - Gospel Principles Ch. 3

2:40 - Pre-1982, 2 Nephi 30:6

2:44 - No longer taught, as he said "early mormon prophets". Brigham Young Journal of Discourses vol 1 pg. 50-51 and Wilford Woodruffs Journal

3:20 - The Seer pg. 172; Brigham Young Journal of Discourses vol. 1, p. 346; Orson Hyde Journal of Discourses, vol 2, p. 210

3:28 - Doctrines and Covenants 113 and Isa. 11

3:32 - Journal of Discourses 13:309

3:41 - 3 Nephi

4:03 - 4 Nephi, Moroni

4:20 - 4:30 - Moroni 10

4:37 - 4:50 - State of NY VS Joseph Smith "The Glass Looker"; other Court Documents

4:43 - 4:50 - 1826-1830 convicted of fraud, admitted "peep-stoning" was fake.

5:01 - Joseph Smith History 1:19

5:16 - 5:21 - Howard W Hunter "your temple recommend" New Era Apr 1995, 6

5:22 - Russell M Nelson "Spirit of Elijah" Ensign Nov 1994, 84 and Doctrines and Covenants 128, 138:33

5:27 - Doctrines and Covenants 132:17-20

5:36 - Robert L Millet, "Joseph Smith Among The Prophets" Ensign Jun 1994, 19

5:49 - :52 - D&C 132

6:03 - History of the Church Vol. pg. 408-412

6:12 - He died in a shootout.

Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 8:42 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Cults
Reactions: 

In Praise of Patriarchy


In Praise of Patriarchy: Countering Feminist Arguments for the Ordination of Women

By Fr. Dwight Longenecker
4/8/2010
Inside Catholic

The feminists had promised that their argument was not theological, merely pragmatic and egalitarian. "Women will make good priests," they said, "and it is unfair that they should be barred from ordination." However, the argument became theological because it was always theological. The traditionalists understood this from the beginning, and the saavy feminists did too -- but they understood that their case for ordination would be derailed if they hinted that they wanted to unseat God the Father completely.

WASHINGTON, DC (Inside Catholic) - When I was an Anglican priest and the feminists were arguing for women's ordination, those who were opposed used the theological argument that the fatherhood of the priest was an indispensable part of a patriarchal system of belief, and that the patriarchal system of belief was indispensable to the Judeo-Christian revelation. In other words, in the family of faith, the priest represents God the Father, and a female can't do that. Tinker with the symbolism of priesthood, and you tinker with the revealed faith.

The feminists countered by saying, "This is not a theological argument. We have no problem with the revelation as it stands. Instead, this is simply a matter of justice. This is about equal rights. That's all." So, eventually, they won the argument, and the Anglican Church voted for women priests.

Almost immediately, the feminists began to tinker with the liturgy to make it "non-sexist." Prayers to "God the Father" were changed to simply address "God" or "Almighty God," and "Father" or "Father in Heaven" was altered to "Almighty God." The changes were subtle and slight to start with. Then they began their revision on the hymns. Any references to God as Father were changed. If they hymn was too grounded in the Fatherhood of God, it quietly disappeared from hymnals altogether.

The next revision was to excise references to God as Son. An alternative Trinitarian formula was offered: Instead of "Father, Son, and Holy Spirit," it was suggested that we say, "Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer." New revisions of the prayer book started to include new "female-friendly" psalms and canticles. Not only were feminist-friendly Scripture passages -- like the ones personifying Divine Wisdom as female -- turned into canticles for worship (no problem with that, necessarily), but sections by much-loved female spiritual writers from the past, like Julian of Norwich, were incorporated and structured as "alternative canticles."

In addition to these innovations, completely new compositions by feminist theologians were also interpolated. You can see the slow drift: Include new scriptural canticles, then include non-scriptural material from the Sacred Tradition, then weave in new material that will eventually become part of the Tradition.

The feminists had promised that their argument was not theological, merely pragmatic and egalitarian. "Women will make good priests," they said, "and it is unfair that they should be barred from ordination." However, the argument became theological because it was always theological. The traditionalists understood this from the beginning, and the saavy feminists did too -- but they understood that their case for ordination would be derailed if they hinted that they wanted to unseat God the Father completely.

In his book Criticizing the Critics, English Dominican Rev. Aidan Nichols outlines the case against the feminist theologians who wish to get rid of patriarchal terminology and so get rid of patriarchy altogether. The feminists argue that patriarchy is a culturally determined part of the Judeo-Christian tradition, and as such it is expendable. God as Father originated in a patriarchal culture. It worked then; it doesn't work now, as we don't have a patriarchal culture anymore. Therefore the patrimony of patriarchy should be scrapped.

Father Nichols stops them in their tracks with a trenchant argument. First of all, he reminds us that, if we believe in a revealed religion at all, it is revealed by God within the times and cultures of human history. In Galatians 4:4, St. Paul teaches, "In the fullness of time God sent forth his son born of a woman." Locked within this short phrase is all the theology that unseats the feminists.

The first part of the phrase -- "In the fullness of time God sent forth" -- teaches us two things: first of all, that the Christian faith is revealed, not relative. God sends forth His Word into the world. The entire Judeo-Christian story is one of God revealing Himself to His people. The second thing this teaches us is that God reveals Himself "in the fullness of time." In other words, He reveals Himself when it is right and through the correct human circumstances -- including the circumstances of place and time and culture. To put it bluntly, God revealed His Son Jesus Christ into the world in the first century through the Jewish people, because that was the very best time and place and culture for His self-revelation to take place.

If this is true, then we cannot dismiss the cultural milieu into which Jesus Christ stepped onto the stage of human history. Does this mean we must all speak Hebrew or Greek, wear long woolen robes, and live like first-century Jews? Of course not -- but there are certain attributes universal to the human race that were in place at that time that are woven into the human condition at a very basic level of physical, spiritual, and mental reality. One of these essential basics is gender and the intricate relationship of the individual to the family -- including the father-child relationship.

This brings us to the second part of the phrase in Galatians: "God sent forth his son born of a woman." Locked within this simple phrase is the realization that God's self-revelation is inextricably bound up with His relationship to Jesus Christ as father to son -- and therefore bound up with the father-son relationship.

Father Nichols explains that this must be so, because the revelation of the Father through the Son is not an arbitrary revelation. It is not chosen because He just happens to be speaking to a patriarchal people, but because the father-son relationship is the essence of God Himself. The self-revelation of the Father through the Son is exactly that: a revelation of God Himself at the most profound level.

Finally, the revelation of God the Father through the Son is accomplished "through a woman." The crucial role of the Blessed Virgin Mary is thus introduced into the divine economy of redemption as a non-negotiable. Her particular role reveals as much about God the Father and God the Son as it does about the Blessed Virgin herself.

Father Nichols points out that the relationship between the Father and the Son takes us to the very heart of the mystery of the Holy Trinity, and therefore to the heart of the mystery of God Himself. God is who He is, because He is in a relationship with three persons in one. The great I AM says, "I AM because I AM in relationship."

Furthermore, this relationship is essentially a filial relationship: It is the relationship of one who begets the other. It is the relationship of father to child. God the Father's identity is defined and revealed by the fact that He is Father to the Only Begotten Son. Therefore, the fatherhood of God is not a culturally determined and anachronistic fossil from a patriarchal age that we have outgrown. Instead, it is a characteristic at the very heart of the essence of who God is.

Arguments for the ordination of women may be conducted on sentimental, egalitarian, and utilitarian lines, but once they stray over the border into theology, they must come face to face with the innate patriarchy of the Judeo-Christian revelation. A patriarchal element is of the essence of historic Christianity and, no matter how unpopular, is indispensable.

Of course, to assert the primacy of patriarchy is not to condone the abuses of patriarchy -- the abuse of women or the overreach of power-hungry men who use patriarchy to consolidate their control. God the Father sets the example of a servant patriarch who gives all for those in His care. Jesus Christ reinforced that model in the story of the loving father in His parable of the prodigal son. This is the sort of father whom earthly fathers are meant to be, and this is the picture of the Heavenly Father, to whom each of us prodigals is on the journey home to meet.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 8:29 AM 2 comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Holy Mysteries (Sacraments), Sexual and Gender Issues
Reactions: 

Sunday, April 11, 2010

The Orthodox Church in America and Its Future


by Saint Nikolai Velimirovich

I feel greatly honored in being called to speak to you in this great city* on this day, the Sunday of Orthodoxy. For this day is indeed our pan-Orthodox Thanksgiving Day, because on this day for the last thousand years we have been giving thanks to Almighty God for the spiritual victories He granted to the holy Fathers of our Church and, through them, to us.

When I mention the Fathers of the Church, I am thinking first of all of the Fathers of the Seven Ecumenical Councils, the first of which was held in A.D. 325 and the last in 787. These Seven Councils represent the seven greatest spiritual battles in the history of Christendom. Like seven pillars of light (the light being Christ), they have illumined the path of our Church through the ages. They remind us of the Biblical words, "Wisdom has built her house, she has hewn out her seven pillars" (Prov. 9:1). They fought against all the apostasies, heresies, pagan teachings and practices, against nebulous oriental occultism and pretentious philosophic theories contrary to Christs revelations.

The seventh of these Councils, which we specially celebrate today, confirmed the canons and regulations of the preceding six and added new ones. Therefore, Orthodox churches the world over are today offering thanks to God for having granted to Christendom those spiritual giants in the first thousand years, when all Christendom was united in one Church.

Besides those Fathers of the Ecumenical Coun-cils, we remember today all the other luminaries of early Church history, which no storm of succeeding events could extinguish. Some of them were great theologians, teachers, and preachers; others were extraordinary ascetics; still others were wonder-working intercessors, or wise leaders and organizers of Christian communities, or successful missionaries, or glorious martyrs for Christ, both male and female. By their words and deeds, by their wisdom and life examples, they continue to edify and assist us in following Christ. All that they taught and wrote is part of what we call the Sacred Tradition of the Church. They represent a precious treasure in our Church, which is Gods family. And therefore we are lifting our hearts with thanks to God for this precious treasure. Yes, this is our pan-Orthodox Thanksgiving Day.

The examples and experiences of these holy men and women are like precious stones left to posterity as their loving legacy. What are these precious stones? They are as many as the number of Christian virtues, but I will discuss here just three of the most essential for our modern times. They are: spiritual vision, moral discipline, and competition in doing good.

Spiritual Vision

Our Lord Jesus Christ revealed to mankind an invisible world incomparably greater than the visible. The spiritual horizon which He opened to men was a much greater wonder than the physical horizon of distant galaxies discovered by modern telescopes. He spoke not like other teachers and philosophers—by hypotheses and theories and probabilities, but by authority of an eyewitness who descended from that great heavenly world in order to draw us to it. He called that world the Kingdom of Heaven. It was the most staggering and gladdening annunciation since the creation of the world. It wiped away the tears of mothers for their dead children, and the tears of children for their deceased parents. "Rejoice and be exceedingly glad,"He said to the mournful world. "Open your spiritual eyes and behold a glorious Kingdom beyond, in which the King is your real Father. And if you cannot easily open your inner sight, look through Me; I am your telescope. Believe me and follow me. Rejoice, and again I say, Rejoice!"

An English lady happened to be present at a Serbian funeral service and heard Orthodox priests chanting repeatedly: "Alleluia, Alleluia, Alleluia." She was shaken and asked, "Is it proper to sing a song of joy over a dead person?" "For us, death is not evil," I answered, "sin alone is evil."

Many times I asked holy monks on Mount Athos—Greeks, Serbs, Russians, Romanians: "What is the best means to keep a person from sinning?" Their usual answer was: "The constant vision of the heavenly world." A Greek elder on Karoulia said, "You must exercise in spiritual vision every day until the other world is clearly opened to you."

It is no wonder that many Protestants call our Orthodox Church transcendent. Through all centuries and generations we have been taught to strive toward the realization and visualization of the other world.

In many of our church hymns, saints and martyrs are glorified because they "gave up the cheap for the precious," or "the mortal for the immortal," or "the transitory for the eternal." Their motive for such a choice was the spiritual vision of the Kingdom of Heaven as our true fatherland, as the real goal of our travelling and toiling in this physical world of mere symbols and shadows.

Moral Discipline

Now, since we acquire that spiritual vision of the Kingdom of Heaven by hard spiritual training and exercises, the question arises: How can we make ourselves worthy of that Kingdom? For the end of our physical life is very near and we have to decide quickly, lest it be too late. The answer is: by moral discipline.

What is moral discipline? It is the "narrow path" that leads to eternal life and bliss. It is clearly described and prescribed in the Gospel, and more particularly in the apostolic epistles, and it is exemplified in the lives of holy men and women, some of whom are mentioned in our calendar, and myriads upon myriads of whom are written in Heavens Book of Life.

Moral discipline is the way to perfection. And nothing less than perfection is our ideal, according to Christs exhortation: "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect" (Matt. 5:48). To accomplish this tremendous task, our holy ancestors who loved the living Christ courageously climbed up the ladder of perfection, step by step. The steps were: incessant prayer, meditation, obedience, humility, meekness, self-restraint, weeping, watchfulness, forgiveness, repentance, sacrificing everything—even their own body. They trained themselves to abstain not only from every evil deed and word, but from every negative thought. They lived in this world as if they were not of this world. They used things of this world as if they were not using them. They considered themselves to be not citizens of this world but merely visitors.

They vigilantly controlled the inner circle of their soulsobserv[ing] every movement of their mind and heart. Thereby they became the greatest psychologists in the world. If you want to know the human soul, read the records of the great spiritual fathers such as Saints Macarius of Egypt, John Chrysostom, Isaac of Syria, and other ascetic fathers. And you will see how impoverished our modern psychology is by comparison. Externally they lived as the most destitute, yet in terms of spiritual wealth, in truth and virtue, they were the richest people. The whole world was not worthy of them. Truly are they called "barefoot aristocrats".

Today we are remembering these spiritual aristocrats, who by superhuman efforts and Gods grace reached perfection. And we are offering our thanks to Christ for presenting us with this brilliant gallery of beautiful and perfect souls in order that we and our children might emulate them. Therefore, we call this day our Orthodox Thanksgiving Day.

Competition in Doing Good

I come finally to the third point, the third jewel that adorned those of our ancestors whom we are celebrating today. That is the new competition or the competition in doing good. Whereas spiritual vision and moral disciplined have individual bearing, the competition in doing good concerns society. It is the highest social virtue.

Christ proclaims this virtue throughout His Gospel. In essence this teaching is: Give more than you are expected to give, and do more than you are expected to do. The world has been revolutionized by this marvelous doctrine. But the Author of this doctrine was crucified because the world was intoxicated by the old competition in doing evil. When a man was striving by every possible means to get rich, his neighbor tried to get richer. If a Roman patrician had a thousand slaves, another patrician tried to have two thousand. If a pharaoh became famous by some conquest, his successor desired greater fame by greater conquests. While Emperor Caligula was very cruel, Nero tried to be yet more cruel.

The new competition in doing good was as different from the old as traveling in darkness is from traveling in sunshine. Our holy ancestors understood the doctrine of the new competition as the highest social virtue, and they trained themselves in that virtue most strenuously all their life long.

Imagine how marvelously changed this awful world would be if you and I entered this competition of doing good. For instance, if every day we eagerly tried to be more pious than some other pious people, more forbearing, more merciful, more peaceful, more sympathetic, more constructive, more forgiving, more loving than others. And all this not for prides sake but for Christs sake. Verily it would solve all the crucial social, political, and economic problems in every Christian country, and it would mightily help Christian missions among non-Christian peoples and nations.

We are glorifying the Lord God because our Orthodox forefathers pointed out and exercised this social ideal of a new competition in doing good and because they showed us a glorious personal example to follow. Therefore, in all Orthodox countries and in the diaspora, this day is considered our common Thanksgiving Day.

Let us now turn our gaze from the East to the far West, i.e., to America.

About 150 years ago Orthodox people of every nationality began to come to this New World, first daring individuals, then small groups, until in our days they have reached, by immigration and by birth, a number equal at least to the number of Episcopalians in the United States.

The first settlers were very simple people, hard workers, farmers. They were just the kind of people who were authentic bearers of that threefold Christian ideal, i.e., of spiritual vision, of moral discipline and of competition in doing good. This was the backbone of their souls, inherited from their fathers in the old countries. They lived up to it as much as they could in this country under changed circumstances. And that was, and still is, their greatest contribution to building American civilization, along with their other contributions of sweat and blood—of sweat in mines and factories, and of blood on Americas battlefields.

They never got rich in this rich country, for they had to divide their modest earnings into three parts: one part for their subsistence and the education of their children, a second part they sent to their families in the old country, and the third they gave to church, school, insurance, and charities.

They built churches and called priests from the old country....They preserved their religious traditions. They cultivated the ancient virtues. They delighted in their national music and songs, in their national costumes and dramatic performances. Personally, I have a deep admiration for these old Orthodox generations in America, both for those who passed away in the Faith, and for those who are still living by their faith. They have been a spiritual and constructive component of the New Worlds humanity. I dare say that in their own way they have been heroic generations no less than other national groups, now blended into one great American nation. In their modesty these humble people never expected a poet to laud them or a historian to describe them.

Alas, the last of these old Orthodox generations is rapidly passing away. Their sons and grandsons, and their daughters and granddaughters are now coming to the field. And this new generation is American born. They speak good English but little or no Greek, Serbian, Russian, Rumanian, Syrian or Albanian. And no wonder: They attended American schools, many of them served in the US army, they have grown in conformity with the American standard of living, their hearts are not divided between two countries. They are naturally Americans, and they intend to remain American. Accordingly, they have some demands respecting the Church of their fathers.

They want English to replace national languages in church services. They desire to hear sermons in English. This is a legitimate desire. Our wise priests of every national Orthodox Church in this country are already preaching in both English and in their respective national tongue. They are in a difficult position at present, for they have on one hand to be considerate of the elderly (elderly generations of Moms and Pops) who do not understand English well, and on the other hand they are willing to respond to the desire and need of the younger generations. In this matter I think evolution is better than revolution, for the Church is the mother of both the old and the young.

The time may not be far off when there will be a united Orthodox Church in America, which will include all the present Eastern national Churches in this country, a Church with one central administrative authority. I see a tendency toward such an end in each of our now individual Churches. ... And when by Gods Providence the time is ripe for the accomplishment of such a unity, I dare not doubt that the venerable heads of all our Orthodox Churches in Europe, Asia, and Africa, always led by the Holy Spirit, will give their blessing for the organization of a new and autonomous sister Church in America.

And now let me make an appeal to all our American Orthodox youth.

America is your cradle and your earthly motherland. It is a wonderful Gods country, and you are expected to be wonderful Gods people in this country. Remember that our greatest contribution to America is of a spiritual and moral nature. And that is precisely what America needs today. That is what every Christian country today needs most of all—in boundless measure. For all nations, especially the Christians nowadays traveling as if in a wilderness of confusion created by senseless materialism and its blind daughter atheism. I offer this to what leading American men and women are saying: "The only hope for us and for the world is to return to religion." Again I say: "Our hope is in the Church." You ought to listen to these words, too, and to ponder them. We live in very tragic times, which are made more tragic by easy-going and self-indulgent people who have never read the story of Sodom, of Laish, or of Capernaum.

If I am correct in my observations, the greatest struggle of America these days is the struggle for the priority and superiority of spiritual and moral values over techniques and technological lordship: in other words, for predominance of the spiritual over the material, of goodness over cleverness. The Serbs often say of a clever man: "He is clever as the devil." They never say: "He is good as the devil."

America is constantly sounding the sympathetic watchwords: "dignity of man" and "liberty of men and nations." But the deepest meaning of these watchwords can be found in the sacred teaching of Him without Whom we can do nothing. That meaning is found most explicitly in the threefold program of our Orthodox Church: spiritual vision, moral discipline, and competition in doing good.

For the dignity of man—in other words, the superior value of man—has real and eternal meaning only if you know and acknowledge the Kingdom of Heaven as the true fatherland of all men, from which we originated and to which we are returning as children of one common Father, Who is in heaven. And freedom is most useful, joyful, and sacred if you exercise moral discipline over yourself and practice competition in doing good.

These are the fundamentals upon which you can build your individual and communal happiness. And you have received these fundamentals as a glorious heritage, never to part with. By practicing this spiritual heritage in your daily life, you will become an adornment to America. And through you all Americans will come to know and appreciate our ancient Church of the East and her spiritual heroes, whom we are praising today.

From Orthodox America, Vol. XIX (No 5 [169]).
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 4:01 PM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Orthodoxy in America
Reactions: 

On Bar Codes and Other Apocalyptic Myths



A relevant talk by Archbishop Lazar Puhalo.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 3:58 PM 7 comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Conspiracies, Eschatology/Death
Reactions: 

The Unceasing Struggles of the Faithful


"There can be no rest for those on earth who desire to be saved," says St. Ephrem the Syrian. The struggle is unceasing be it either external or internal. The adversary acts visibly at times through men and other things and at other times, invisibly through thoughts. At times, the adversary appears openly and behaves brutally and cruelly like an enemy and, at other times, under the guise of a flattering friend, he seduces by shrewdness. That which occurs in battle between two opposing armies also occurs to every man individually in battle with the passions of this world. Truly, "There can be no rest for those on earth who desire to be saved." When salvation comes, rest also comes.

- St. Nikolai Velimirovich, Prologue
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 3:54 PM 1 comment: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Christian Living, Soteriology, Spirituality, Theodicy/Evil/Suffering
Reactions: 

The Symbol of Georgian National and Spiritual Revival


April 9, 2010
The Messenger

The Holy Trinity Cathedral, commonly known as Sameba, is the main Georgian Orthodox Christian cathedral in Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia.

In May 1989 the Georgian Orthodox Patriarchate and the Tbilisi authorities announced an international contest to design the Holy Trinity Cathedral to commemorate the 1,500 years of the autocephaly of the Georgian Orthodox Church and 2,000 years from the birth of Jesus Christ. 1989 was a crucial year for the then-Soviet Republic of Georgia but the idea of building a new cathedral filled the people with hope for a better future.

It was difficult to identify the best entry despite the huge number of participants. No winner was chosen in the first round of the contest, to which more than a hundred projects were submitted. But finally architect Archil Mindiashvili's design proved the winner.

The subsequent turbulent years of civil unrest deferred this grandiose plan for six years, and it was not until November 23, 1995 that the foundation stone of the new cathedral was finally laid. The construction of the church was sponsored by mostly anonymous donations by several businessmen and common citizens of Georgia.

The cathedral was consecrated by Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia Ilia II and the high-ranking representatives of fellow Orthodox churches around the world on St. George's Day on November 23, 2004. The consecration was also attended by the leaders of other religious and confessional communities of Georgia and political leaders.

Sameba Cathedral is built on the Elia Hill, which rises above the left bank of the Mtkvari River in Avlabari in Old Tbilisi. The Cathedral represents a synthesis of traditional styles of Georgian church architecture at various stages of its history but also contains several innovations. Sameba is a cruciform church crowned with a dome over a crossing, which rests upon eight columns. At the same time the parameters of the dome are independent from the apses, imparting a more monumental look to the dome and the church in general. The dome is surmounted by a 7.5 metre-high cross covered with gold.

The cathedral consists of chapels dedicated to the Archangels, John the Baptist, Saint Nino, Saint George, Saint Nicholas, the Twelve Apostles, and All Saints, five of them situated in a large underground compartment. The overall area of the cathedral, including a large narthex, is 5,000 square metres and it occupies 137 cubic metres of space. The inner perimeter of the church is 56m by 44m. The height of the cathedral from the ground to the top of the cross is 84 metres. The underground chapel occupies 35,550 cubic metres and is 13 metres tall.

Natural materials have been used in its construction. The floor is made of marble tiles and the altar will also be decorated with mosaics. Murals are being painted by a group of artists led by Amiran Goglidze. The whole Sameba complex consists of the main cathedral church, a free-standing bell-tower, the residence of the Patriarch, a monastery, a clerical seminary and theological academy, several workshops, places for rest, etc.

The Holy Trinity Cathedral has become the symbol of the Georgian national and spiritual revival. Thousands of faithful attend liturgies there and pray for the peace and unity of their country, asking God for blessings and waiting for a miracle.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 3:45 PM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Orthodoxy in Georgia
Reactions: 

Saint Antipas: A Martyr of the Apocalypse

Hieromartyr Antipas of Pergamum (Feast Day - April 11)

From the OCA website:

The Hieromartyr Antipas, a disciple of the holy Apostle John the Theologian (September 26), was bishop of the Church of Pergamum during the reign of the emperor Nero (54-68).

During these times, everyone who would not offer sacrifice to the idols lived under threat of either exile or execution by order of the emperor. On the island of Patmos (in the Aegean Sea) the holy Apostle John the Theologian was imprisoned, he to whom the Lord revealed the future judgment of the world and of Holy Church.

"And to the angel of the Church of Pergamum write: the words of him who has the sharp two-edged sword. I know where you live, where the throne of Satan is, and you cleave unto My Name, and have not renounced My faith, even in those days when Antipas was My faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwells" (Rev 2:12-13).

By his personal example, firm faith and constant preaching about Christ, St Antipas began to turn the people of Pergamum from offering sacrifice to idols. The pagan priests reproached the bishop for leading the people away from their ancestral gods, and they demanded that he stop preaching about Christ and offer sacrifice to the idols instead.

St Antipas calmly answered that he was not about to serve the demons that fled from him, a mere mortal. He said he worshiped the Lord Almighty, and he would continue to worship the Creator of all, with His Only-Begotten Son, and the Holy Spirit. The pagan priests retorted that their gods existed from of old, whereas Christ was not from of old but was crucified under Pontius Pilate as a criminal. The saint replied that the pagan gods were the work of human hands and that everything said about them was filled with iniquities and vices. He steadfastly confessed his faith in the Son of God, incarnate of the Most Holy Virgin.

The enraged pagan priests dragged the Hieromartyr Antipas to the temple of Artemis and threw him into a red-hot copper bull, where usually they put the sacrifices to the idols. In the red-hot furnace the martyr prayed loudly to God, imploring Him to receive his soul and to strengthen the faith of the Christians . [He also asked forgiveness for his tormentors and that he would help be a source of healing to the faithful, especially those suffering from ailments of teeth]. He went to the Lord peacefully, as if he were going to sleep (+ c. 68 or c. 92).

At night Christians took the body of the Hieromartyr Antipas, which was untouched by the fire. They buried him at Pergamum. The tomb of the hieromartyr became a font of miracles and of healings from various sicknesses.

We pray to the Hieromartyr Antipas for relief from toothache, and diseases of the teeth.


From The Prologue of St. Nikolai Velimirovich:

Antipas is mentioned in the Book of Revelation as, "Antipas, my faithful witness, who was martyred among you, where Satan lives" (Revelation 2:13), i.e., in the city of Pergamum. The inhabitants of this city lived in the darkness of idolatry and in extreme impurity. They were slaves to passions. They were slanderers, tyrants and they were incestuous. In other words, they were the servants of Satan. Here among them lived Antipas, "As a light in the midst of darkness, as a rose among thorns and as gold in mud." He, who captured and killed a Christian, would be deemed as good and just. The totality of pagan belief consisted of soothsaying, interpretation of dreams, serving demons and extreme perversion. Being frightened of Antipas as from fire, the demons appeared to the soothsayers in a dream and confessed how afraid they were of Antipas and how, because of him, they must depart from this city. The pagan priests summoned a large number of people against Antipas and began to interrogate and to force him to deny Christ and to worship idols. Antipas said to them: "When your so-called gods, lords of the universe are frightened of me, a mortal man, and must flee from this city, do you not recognize that, by this, your faith is an aberration?" The saint also spoke to them further about the Faith of Christ as being the only One, True Saving Faith. They became enraged as wild beasts and dragged the aged Antipas to the temple of Artemis before which stood an ox cast in bronze. They heated the bronzed ox and hurled the servant of God into the red-hot molten ox. From within the molten ox, St. Antipas glorified God with thanksgiving, as once did Jonah in the belly of the whale or the Three Youths in the fiery furnace. Antipas prayed for his flock and for the entire world until his soul parted from his weakened body and ascended among the angels into the Kingdom of Christ. He died suffering and was crowned with unfading glory in the year 92 A.D.

HYMN OF PRAISE: SAINT ANTIPAS

In a fiery ox as in a luminous temple
Antipas, the Christian, does not suffer loneliness:
In his pure heart, the Lord abides
Neither the fire burns him neither is he in horror of it
The saint for Christ patiently endures all,
And prayers to Christ from the fire, ascend,
Oh, All-Powerful Christ, King of all ages,
For these sufferings, a hundred-fold thanks be to You!
All in me that is sinful, let burn with fire,
That I be more precious according to heavenly worth.
Oh Savior, I pray to You; my flock protect
In this town, in awful dung!
May my blood strengthen them in the Faith,
And their hearts to You be fixed.
And for the heathen, also, O Blessed One I pray to You
Seize them, once and for all, from demonic lies;
And for all sinners, who ridicule Your law,
Direct them to You, the only One to serve.
Behold, all is within the authority of Your Holy Will,
And finally, to You I pray: may it be better for the Church!


Apolytikion in the First Tone
The celebrated hierarch and Pegamum's first prelate, the fellow-contestant of Martyrs and most divine myrrh-streamer, ye faithful, come let us honour now wise Antipas, who truly is a great and swift healer of severely afflicted teeth, and cry to him with our whole soul: Glory to Christ that hath glorified thee. Glory to Him that hath crowned thee. Glory to Him that worketh healings for all through thee.

Kontakion in the Plagal of the Fourth Tone
Unto the hierarch and renowned Great Martyr of the Lord, to the most excellent protector of all Pergamum, unto him that cast our common foe down in ruin, unto Antipas let us sing praises as is due, for he healeth them that suffer from afflicted teeth. Let us cry with love: Rejoice, O thrice-blessed Father.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:40 AM 3 comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Apostles and Early Church, New Testament, Saints
Reactions: 

Thomas Didn't Believe So That All May Believe


by St. Gregory the Great

Thomas, one of the twelve, called the Twin, was not with them when Jesus came. He was the only disciple absent; on his return he heard what had happened but refused to believe it. The Lord came a second time; He offered His side for the disbelieving disciple to touch, held out His hands, and showing the scars of His wounds, healed the wound of his disbelief.

Dearly beloved, what do you see in these events? Do you really believe that it was by chance that this chosen disciple was absent, then came and heard, heard and doubted, doubted and touched, touched and believed? It was not by chance but in God’s providence. In a marvelous way God’s mercy arranged that the disbelieving disciple, in touching the wounds of his Master’s body, should heal our wounds of disbelief.

The disbelief of Thomas has done more for our faith than the faith of the other disciples. As he touches Christ and is won over to belief, every doubt is cast aside and our faith is strengthened. So the disciple who doubted, then felt Christ’s wounds, becomes a witness to the reality of the resurrection.

Touching Christ, he cried out: "My Lord and my God."

Jesus said to him: "Because you have seen me, Thomas, you have believed."

Paul said: "Faith is the guarantee of things hoped for, the evidence of things unseen."

It is clear, then, that faith is the proof of what can not be seen. What is seen gives knowledge, not faith. When Thomas saw and touched, why was he told: "You have believed because you have seen me?"

Because what he saw and what he believed were different things. God cannot be seen by mortal man. Thomas saw a human being, whom he acknowledged to be God, and said: "My Lord and my God."

Seeing, he believed; looking at one who was true man, he cried out that this was God, the God he could not see.

What follows is reason for great joy: "Blessed are those who have not seen and have believed."

There is here a particular reference to ourselves; we hold in our hearts One we have not seen in the flesh. We are included in these words, but only if we follow up our faith with good works. The true believer practices what he believes. But of those who pay only lip service to faith, Paul has this to say: "They profess to know God, but they deny him in their works."

Therefore James says: "Faith without works is dead."
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:33 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Atheism-Agnosticism-Skepticism, Pascha and the Pentecostarion
Reactions: 

Doubting Thomas


By Protopresbyter Alexander Schmemann

“Unless I see…I will not believe” (John 20:25). So said Thomas, one of Christ’s twelve disciples, in response to the joyful news of those who had seen their crucified and buried Teacher risen from the dead. Eight days later, as recorded in the gospels, when the disciples once again were all together, Christ appeared and told Thomas: “Put your finger here and see my hands; and put out your hand and place it in my side; be not faithless, but believing.” And Thomas exclaimed: “My Lord and my God!” Then Christ told him: “You have believed because you have seen me; blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe…” (John 20:24-31).

Millions of people today think and speak essentially like Thomas, and assume that this is the only correct approach worthy of any thinking person. “Unless I see, I will not believe…” In our contemporary speech isn’t this the “scientific approach?” But Christ says: “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe.” This means that there is, and was, another approach, another standard, another possibility. True, others may say, but that approach is naïve and not rational; it’s unscientific; it’s for people who are backward; and since I’m a person of the modern world, “Unless I see, I will not believe.”

We live in a world of great oversimplification and therefore spiritual poverty. “Scientific” or “Unscientific.” People use words like these all the time as if they were self-evident and self-explanatory, and they use them because everyone else also uses them, without reflection, without debate. In fact, they themselves believe these reductions blindly and simplistically, and so any other approach appears to them as neither serious nor worthy of attention. The question is already decided. But is that really true? I just said that we live in a world of great spiritual poverty. And indeed, if the end result of humanity’s interminable development boils down to this pronouncement, “I won’t believe it till I see it”; if the human race looks upon this as the height of wisdom and reason’s greatest victory, then our world truly is poor, superficial, and most all, incredibly boring. If I only know what I see, touch, measure and analyze, then how little I really know! The whole world of the human spirit falls by the wayside, all the intuition and profound knowledge that flow not from “I see” or “I touch,” but from “I think” and, most importantly, “I contemplate.”

What falls away is that realm of knowledge which for centuries was rooted not in external, observable experience, but in another human faculty, an amazing and perhaps inexplicable ability that sets human beings apart from everything else and makes them truly unique. Even robots, machines and computers can now touch, handle and manipulate objects; they can make accurate observations, and even make predictions. We know that they actually perform better than human beings in measuring, comparing, making exact observations flawlessly; they are more accurate, more “scientific.” But here is what no robot, under any circumstances, will ever be able to do: to be filled with wonder, to be awed, to have feelings, to be moved by tenderness, to rejoice, to see what can’t be seen by measurement or analysis of any kind. No robot will hear those unheard sounds that give birth to music and poetry; no robot will ever cry, or trust. But without all this doesn’t our world become colorless, boring and, I would say, unnecessary? Oh yes, planes and spaceships will fly ever further and faster. But where to and what for? Oh yes, laboratories will conduct their analyses with ever increasing accuracy. But to what end? “For the good of humanity,” I’m told. I understand, so this means that one day we will have a healthy, well fed, self-satisfied human being walking about, who will be totally blind, totally deaf and totally unaware of his deafness and blindness.

“Unless I see I will not believe.” Clearly, however, observable experience, empirical data, is just one form of knowledge, the most elementary, and therefore the lowest form. Empirical analysis is useful and necessary, but to reduce all human knowledge to this level is like trying to comprehend the beauty of a painting by a chemical analysis of its paint. What we call faith is at a second and higher level of human knowledge, without which, it can be claimed, man would be unable to live even a single day. Every person believes in something or someone, so the only question is whose faith, whose vision, whose knowledge of the world corresponds more accurately and more completely to the richness and complexity of life.

Some say that the resurrection of Christ must be a fabrication since the dead do not rise. True, if there is no God. But if God exists, then death must be overthrown, since God cannot be a God of decay and death. Others will then say: but there is no God, since no one has seen him. But how then do you account for the experience of millions of people who joyfully affirm that they have seen, not with their physical eyes, but with a profound and certain inner sight? Two thousand years have passed, but when the joyful proclamation “Christ is risen!” descends as if from heaven, all still send out the same triumphant response, “Truly He is risen!”

Is it really true that you neither see nor hear? Is it really true that in the deepest part of your consciousness, away from all analysis, measurements and palpation, you neither see nor feel any undying, radiant light, you do not hear the sounds of an eternal voice: “I am the way, the resurrection and the life…”? Is it really true that in the depth of your soul you do not recognize Christ within us, within me, answering Doubting Thomas, “Blessed are those who have not seen, and yet believe?”
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:27 AM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Apologetics, Atheism-Agnosticism-Skepticism, Pascha and the Pentecostarion, Science-Intelligent Design-Darwinism
Reactions: 

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Homily for the Sunday of Saint Thomas


by St. John of Kronstadt

Christ is Risen!

Beloved brothers, so Bright Week has passed and taken with it our deeds to the throne of the Heavenly Master and Judge: there, brothers, there are our deeds now. I say this in order to frighten with the fear of the heavenly judgment those who unworthily, not Christian-like, spent the feast of the bright Resurrection of Christ and to comfort those who spent it with temperance and spiritual joy.

How did very many spend the feast of the bright Resurrection? I would not like to call to remembrance foul human deeds but they, together with those that performed them, need to be remembered and judged on behalf of God. The all-bright feast was met, after the bright Paschal service, with dark deeds: intemperance and drunkenness, fights, cursing, and all types of sin. Consider that we fasted before the feast only in order to, with even more eagerness, rush into all fleshly, sinful deeds so that we can unashamedly and with insolence indulge in every iniquity. Alas! Woe unto us!

All those who met the feast with intemperance and drunkenness, adultery, cursing, and other similar deeds of the flesh lost all the benefit which they had received (if they even received any) from the fast, lost the benefit from repentance and communion of the Holy Mysteries, trampled them as an unreasonable animal under their feet, lost the acceptable time for salvation, given them by the mercy of the Lord, time which will not be returned. It was proper to say to you during the fast, behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation (2 Cor. 6:2) for it was just then that you had come to the saving font of repentance and to the all-cleansing, true Mysteries of the body and blood of the Lord. Now your confession and communion is put off until the next fast but who knows if the Lord will vouchsafe you to again confess and commune? Who knows if you will repose in those very iniquities with which again, after the font of repentance, you have defiled yourself? How painful, how piteous, beloved brothers, that so soon you have turned out to be betrayers of Christ and have given yourself over to the devil to serve him, the original murderer, the author of, and instructor in of every type of sin! You are, using the words of the Savior, and I, a great sinner, am as well are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do (John 8:44).

What, then, remains for us to do, beloved brothers? To pray and weep for our sins. To weep that not Christian-like and not even human-like did many of us meet the feast but like vile idol worshipers and like wild animals, which have not been fed for a long time with their favorite food. To weep that we have trampled upon the great, soul-saving Mysteries of Christ, that is, repentance and communion, and counted them as nought. To weep that the time, given for salvation, we have thoughtlessly lost. May we weep and pray to the Lord that He “not become angry with us neither destroy us with our iniquities” (first morning prayer) but would return us to the way of repentance and make us skilled performers of His commandments. Let us firmly decide from now on not to give ourselves over to intemperance and drunkenness and all the sins which follow, and with tears ask the Lord that He, with the Grace of the Holy Spirit, would strengthen us in our intentions and good deeds.

Brothers! May we all shed tears for we all unworthily met the great feast of the Lord and angered our Lord; not in this way, not in this way indeed, should we meet the feasts of the Lord. We need to meet them with spiritual joy in the Lord, for our deliverance from sins and for our eternal salvation through Christ, the Son of God, with deeds of mercy, temperance from passions, visiting the church of God in spirit and truth and with simplicity in food and clothing.

O, you, decorated with gold and a multitude of precious fabrics, women and maids! In the name of the Lord, I direct my speech to you! What a multitude of poor would you have been able to cause to rejoice on the all-bright day of the Resurrection of Christ and, in that way, worthily meet that great feast, if you would have, in generosity and Christian love, changed even a few of these decorations into money and given that money to the poor who are so many in our city? Would it not have been reasonable, in a Christian way, if you had fewer precious clothing and the money remaining you had given to the poor? What rich mercy would you have received on that day from Christ the Lord? Yes, truly Christian-like would you have then met the feast of Christ’s Resurrection. But now what? You are decorated like idols but the members of Christ are without clothes; you are satiated but the members of Christ are in want; you roll in every possible pleasure but those are in tears; we are in rich and decorated dwellings but those are in cramped conditions and uncleanness, in dwellings which are often not any better than a pigsty. We do not have Christian love and, therefore, there is no true feast of the Resurrection of Christ, for those truly celebrate the Resurrection who himself is raised from dead deeds to deeds of virtue and Christian faith and love, trampling on intemperance, luxury, and all of the passions. Brothers! May we celebrate the feasts of the Lord as Christians and not as pagans! Amen.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 11:50 PM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Pascha and the Pentecostarion
Reactions: 

Orthodox Bulgaria Marks Sunday of St. Thomas


April 10, 2010
Novinite

Bulgaria marks on April 10, the Sunday after Easter or Sunday of St. Thomas, also known as Second Sunday or Antipascha.

Historically, this day in the early Church was the day that the newly-baptized Christians removed their robes and entered once again into the life of this world.

This day is also known as Antipascha. This does not mean "opposed to Pascha," but "in place of Pasch," i.e., at the other end of Bright Week.

Liturgically, the Church remembers the Apostle Thomas' vision of Christ after eight days.

Thomas the Apostle, also called Doubting Thomas was one of the Twelve Apostles of Jesus. He is best known for disbelieving Jesus' resurrection when first told of it, then proclaiming "My Lord and my God" on seeing Jesus in John 20:28.

On the eight day Christ said to Thomas, "Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it in my side; do not be faithless, but believing." Thomas answered him, "My Lord and my God!" Jesus said to him, "Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe" (John 20:26-29).

In Bulgaria, on Sunday of St. Thomas women dye eggs one more time and give them away for the souls of their dead relatives and friends. The belief is that this giving away of colored eggs will prevent the latter from reincarnation.

The Second Sunday in Bulgaria is also the name day of Toma, Tomislav, Tomislava.
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 10:58 PM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Orthodoxy in Bulgaria, Pascha and the Pentecostarion
Reactions: 

Feast of the Synaxis of the Holy Kollyvades Fathers

Icon of the Synaxis of the Holy Kollyvades Fathers


On the Saturday of Bright Week, a service has been written to commemorate all of the Saintly Holy Fathers of the so-called "Kollyvades" movement. These were monastics primarily from Mount Athos who taught adherence to Holy Orthodox dogma and tradition amid waves of westernization and secularism during the years of the Turkish occupation of Greece. The ranks of such Holy Fathers include some of the Church's most beloved Saints: St. Nikodemos of the Holy Mountain, St. Makarios (Notaras) of Corinth, St. Nektarios of Pentapolis, St. Kosmas Aitolos, St. Savvas of Kalymnos, St. Athanasios of Paros, St. Paisius Velichovsky, St. Nicholas Planas, and so many more. The following quote (from mountathos.gr) discusses the Holy Mountain and the Kollyvades by Monk Moses:

"In the mid 18th century a grave theological debate developed all over the Holy Mountain in connection with the issues of the holding of memorial services for the departed, frequency of Holy Communion, and other matters relating to the exact observance of Orthodox tradition. The starting-point for this prolonged controversy was the building of the kyriakon at the Skete of St Anne (1754). The question arose as to whether the commemoration of the founders and benefactors should be held on Saturday or Sunday, and with what frequency the monks should receive Holy Communion. The debate divided the monks, and those who insisted that the memorial services should be held on Saturdays were mockingly dubbed 'kollyvades'. It seems, however, that, behind their apparent obstinacy, they had a profound knowledge of church tradition and fought hard for its authenticity and for its purification from adulteration. Thus the name of 'kollyvas' became a title of honour and the movement was responsible for a profitable and beneficial regeneration and renewal. Indeed, this devout movement was led by three saints: Makarios Notaras, Nicodemus the Athonite, and Athanasios of Paros, and they numbered among their supporters and sympathisers distinguished scholars such as Neophytos Kafsokalyvitis, Christophoros Artinos, Agapios of Cyprus, Iakovos the Peloponnesian, Pavlos the hermit, Theodoritos of Esphigmenou, and a number of others. Some of them chose voluntary exile and took refuge in mainland Greece or the islands, where they founded scores of monasteries, of which a fair number survive today. Thus we see Makarios Notaras on Chios, Niphon on Skiathos, Dionysios of Skiathos on Skyros, Ierotheos on Hydra, with numerous disciples and friends of that Athonite tradition which has nourished monks and saints. The monasteries which they founded were noted for their vigour and service. The Ecumenical Patriarchate by decisions of the Holy Synod finally put an end to the 'kollyvades' issue, by ruling that memorial services could be held as circumstances demanded and that Holy Communion, with the proper preparation, could be received frequently, and that the life of the substance, and not the aridity of the form, was to be adhered to."
(taken from:
http://www.mountathos.gr/active.aspx?mode=en%7B00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000004%7DView)

Apolytikion (in Greek) of the Holy Kollyvades Fathers

Apolytikion of the Holy Kollyvades Fathers - 1st Tone

Let us honor the choir of Kollyvades Fathers, ministers of the Holy Spirit, stewards of grace, they taught to us the Gospel of Christ in evil times, and as very bright stars, they delivered souls from the darkness of error. Rejoice o Godly band, rejoice boast of the nation, rejoice torches of truth and expounders of the faith.


For the full service text (in Greek) of the Synaxis of the Holy Kollyvades Fathers:
http://www.pigizois.net/latreia/paraklitikoi_kanones/pdf/esperinos_kolivadon_pateron.pdf http://www.pigizois.net/latreia/paraklitikoi_kanones/pdf/orthros_kolivadon_pateron.pdf

Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 4:47 PM 1 comment: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Modern Saints and Elders, Mount Athos, Pascha and the Pentecostarion, Saints, Spirituality, Tradition
Reactions: 

"The Byzantine Empire Sucks": A Cynical View

In 60 seconds Olivia Munn offers an "epic" rant as to why she thinks the Byzantine Empire sucks. Though I of course strongly disagree with her (except for her first point), I am only hoping that this segment will prove not only how under appreciated the Byzantine Empire is, but how misunderstood as well.

Game Reviews - E3 2010 - Comedy
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 12:36 PM 13 comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Funny, Roman (Byzantine) Empire
Reactions: 

Experiences of the Risen Jesus


Experiences of the Risen Jesus: The Foundational Historical Issue in the Early Proclamation of the Resurrection

by Gary R. Habermas

Introduction

Having specialized for several decades in critical studies of the resurrection of Jesus, I recently decided to update my Bibliography. What began rather modestly evolved into a five year study of well over 2000 sources on this topic, published from 1975 to the present in German, French, and English. I was most interested in scholarly trends, resulting in a survey of well over 100 sub-issues.

One area of concentration was the common historical content recognized by virtually all researchers. For a variety of reasons, contemporary scholars widely conclude that after his death, Jesus' followers at least thought that they had seen appearances of the risen Jesus. Do the disciples' beliefs that they had witnessed resurrection appearances provide any clues as to what may really have occurred? The answer depends on how one accounts for these experiences. Here, where scholarship differs widely, three chief options prevail. In spite of these differences, it is my contention that this is the single most crucial aspect of the historical question.

During the examination of this subject, I will attempt to clarify some of the relevant issues in order to narrow the major options. While I will not choose between these answers regarding the underlying cause, my chief task is to tighten the focus of the discussion. In the process, I will use chiefly those data to which the vast majority of recent researchers agree, at least in principle, regardless of their theological positions. Due to the volume of relevant material, I will often resort to summarized conclusions of recent scholarly trends. The endnotes provide additional background information, perspectives, argumentation, and other details.

The Disciples' Experiences of the Risen Jesus

The substantially unanimous verdict of contemporary critical scholars is that Jesus' disciples at least believed that Jesus was alive, resurrected from the dead. Reginald Fuller refers to the disciples’ belief in Jesus' resurrection as "one of the indisputable facts of history." Upon what was their claim based? Fuller continues that it is clear that the disciples had real experiences, characterized as appearances or visions of the risen Jesus. Whether these are explained naturally or supernaturally, this experience "is a fact upon which both believer and unbeliever may agree."[1]

In recent studies of the historical Jesus, this aspect has enjoyed the support of a broad scholarly consensus. E.P Sanders declares that the "equally secure facts" indicate that Jesus' disciples "saw him (in what sense is not certain) after his death . . . . Thereafter his followers saw him."[2]

That the vast majority of scholars, in spite of extensive disagreements in other areas, recognizes that the disciples had some sort of experience is a significant starting point. How these experiences are explained is another matter. But there are some rather impressive reasons that explain such a widespread, initial conclusion. We will begin by listing eight pointers, four from Paul and four more from various other sources.

(1) Contemporary critical scholars agree that the apostle Paul is the primary witness to the early resurrection experiences. A former opponent (1 Cor. 15:9; Gal. 1:13-14; Phil. 3:4-7), Paul states that the risen Jesus appeared personally to him (1 Cor. 9:1; 15:8; Gal. 1:16). The scholarly consensus here is attested by atheist Michael Martin, who avers: "However, we have only one contemporary eyewitness account of a postresurrection appearance of Jesus, namely Paul’s."[3]

(2) In addition to Paul's own experience, few conclusions are more widely recognized than that, in 1 Corinthians 15:3ff., Paul records an ancient oral tradition(s). This pre-Pauline report summarizes the early Gospel content, that Christ died for human sin, was buried, rose from the dead, and then appeared to many witnesses, both individuals and groups.

Paul is clear that this material was not his own but that he had passed on to others what he had received earlier, as the center of his message (15:3). There are many textual indications that the material pre-dates Paul. Most directly, the apostle employs paredoka and parelabon, the equivalent Greek terms for delivering and receiving rabbinic tradition (cf. 1 Cor. 11:23). Indirect indications of a traditional text(s) include the sentence structure and verbal parallelism, diction, and the triple sequence of kai hoti Further, several non-Pauline words, the proper names of Cephas (cf. Lk. 24:34) and James, and the possibility of an Aramaic original are all significant. Fuller attests to the unanimity of scholarship here: "It is almost universally agreed today that Paul is here citing tradition."[4] Critical scholars agree that Paul received the material well before this book was written.[5]

The most popular view is that Paul received this material during his trip to Jerusalem just three years after his conversion, to visit Peter and James, the brother of Jesus (Gal. 1:18-19), both of whose names appear in the appearance list (1 Cor. 15:5; 7). An important hint here is Paul's use of the verb historesai (1:18), a term that indicates the investigation of a topic.[6] The immediate context both before and after reveals this subject matter: Paul was inquiring concerning the nature of the Gospel proclamation (Gal. 1:11-2:10), of which Jesus' resurrection was the center (1 Cor. 15:3-4, 14, 17; Gal. 1:11, 16).

Critical scholars generally agree that this pre-Pauline creed(s) may be the earliest in the New Testament. Ulrich Wilckens asserts that it "indubitably goes back to the oldest phase of all in the history of primitive Christianity."[7] Joachim Jeremias agrees that it is, "the earliest tradition of all."[8] Perhaps a bit too optimistically, Walter Kasper even thinks that it was possibly even "in use by the end of 30 AD . . . ."[9]

Indicating the wide approval on this subject, even more skeptical scholars frequently agree. Gerd Ludemann maintains that "the elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus. . . . not later than three years. . . . the formation of the appearance traditions mentioned in I Cor.15.3-8 falls into the time between 30 and 33 CE. . . ."[10] Similarly, Michael Goulder thinks that it "goes back at least to what Paul was taught when he was converted, a couple of years after the crucifixion."[11] Thomas Sheehan agrees that this tradition "probably goes back to at least 32-34 C.E., that is, to within two to four years of the crucifixion."[12] Others clearly consent.[13]

Overall, my recent overview of critical sources mentioned above indicates that those who provide a date generally opt for Paul's reception of this report relatively soon after Jesus’ death, by the early to mid-30s A.D.[14] This provides an additional source that appears just a half step removed from eyewitness testimony.

(3) Paul was so careful to assure the content of his Gospel message, that he made a second trip to Jerusalem (Gal. 2:1-10) specifically to be absolutely sure that he had not been mistaken (2:2). The first time he met with Peter and James (Gal. 1:18-20). On this occasion, the same two men were there, plus the apostle John (2:9). Paul was clearly doing his research by seeking out the chief apostles. As Martin Hengel notes, "Evidently the tradition of I Cor. 15.3 had been subjected to many tests" by Paul.[15]

These four apostles were the chief authorities in the early church, and each is represented in the list of those who had seen the resurrected Jesus (1 Cor. 15:5-7). So their confirmation of Paul's Gospel preaching (Gal. 2:9), especially given the apostolic concern to insure doctrinal truth in the early church, is certainly significant. On Paul's word, we are again just a short distance from a firsthand report.

(4) Not only do we have Paul's account that the other major apostles confirmed his Gospel message, but he provides the reverse testimony, too. After listing Jesus' resurrection appearances, Paul tells us he also knew what the other apostles were preaching regarding Jesus' appearances, and it was the same as his own teaching on this subject (1 Cor. 15:11). As one, they proclaimed that Jesus was raised from the dead (15:12, 15). So Paul narrates both the more indirect confirmation of his Gospel message by the apostolic leaders, plus his firsthand, direct approval of their resurrection message.

(5) Critical scholars usually recognize that James, the brother of Jesus, was a rather skeptical unbeliever prior to Jesus' crucifixion (Mk. 3:21-35; Jn. 7:5). Not long afterwards, James is a leader of the Jerusalem church, where Paul finds him during his two visits (Gal. 1:18-19; 2:1-10; cf. Acts 15:13-21). In-between, the pre-Pauline statement in 1 Corinthians 15:7 states that the risen Jesus appeared to James.

Scholars find several reasons for believing that James was an unbeliever before this event. John Meier points out that James' unbelief is multiply attested. Further, the criterion of embarrassment is probably the strongest consideration, since it would be highly unlikely that the early church would otherwise sponsor what would potentially be some "deeply offensive" statements regarding Jesus' brother, as well as a major leader. To a lesser extent, the criterion of coherence indicates a similarity between Jesus' frequent call to place God before one's family, and Jesus' own example, in that he did the same although some of his own family members were unbelievers.[16]

Surprisingly, Fuller concludes that even if the New Testament had not referenced the resurrection appearance to James, "we should have to invent" one in order to account for his conversion and his promotion to his lofty position in the Jerusalem church![17] The majority of recent scholars, including many rather skeptical ones, agree that James was converted from unbelief by Jesus' personal appearance.[18]

(6) Many other early creedal texts are found throughout the New Testament. Many scholars think that the Book of Acts incorporates some of these early traditions, located in the sermons contained there.[19] They are generally identified by factors such as their compactness, theological simplicity, and because the structure, style, and/or diction reflect word patterns other than the author's. Not as widely accepted as the pre-Pauline tradition(s) in 1 Corinthians 15:3ff., it still appears that a majority of critical scholars conclude that some of these snippets reflect the early preaching of the Gospel message.[20] The risen Jesus is the center of each tradition, and Jesus' appearances are mentioned frequently.[21]

These Acts traditions are often dated very early. Gerald O’Collins thinks that this book "incorporates resurrection formulae which stem from the thirties."[22] John Drane concludes that this material "almost certainly goes back to the time immediately after the resurrection event is alleged to have taken place."[23]

(7) Virtually no critical scholar questions that the disciples’ convictions regarding the risen Jesus caused their radical transformation, even being willing to die for their beliefs. Their change does not evidence the resurrection appearances per se, but it is a clear indication that the disciples at least thought that they had experienced the risen Jesus.[24] Alternatives must account for this belief.

(8) In the study mentioned at the outset of this essay, I found that approximately 75% of the surveyed scholars accept one or more arguments for the historicity of the empty tomb. The remaining 25% accept one or more arguments against the early church's knowledge of an empty tomb. If the majority is correct that Jesus' burial tomb was later found empty, this perhaps adds some credibility to the disciples' claim that they saw the risen Jesus. If the minority view is correct, this reason would of course not support Jesus' appearances.[25]

The survey revealed almost two dozen reasons supporting Jesus’ empty tomb. These include the potentially embarrassing but unanimous agreement in all four Gospels that women were the earliest witnesses, Jerusalem being the least-likely place for a resurrection proclamation, the attestation by multiple sources, the early pre-Pauline creed (1 Cor. 15:3-4) implying an empty tomb (cf. the possible early tradition in Acts 13:29-31, 36-37), along with the later report that the Jewish leaders conceded it (Matt. 28:11-15).[26]

The minority position that accepted one or more reasons against the empty tomb cited a total of about a dozen opposing considerations. These tend to center on the lateness of the Gospel reports, Paul's lack of discussion (and perhaps knowledge) of the empty tomb, and that the report served apologetic purposes in Christian preaching.

The empty tomb is not as widely held as are the other historical reasons for the disciples' experiences, which are seldom disputed. Still, most critical scholars agree that Jesus' tomb was found empty. James D.G. Dunn concludes: "I have to say quite forcefully: the probability is that the tomb was empty. As a matter of historical reconstruction, the weight of evidence points firmly to the conclusion. . . ." Potential alternative explanations are not feasible.[27] Historian Michael Grant surprisingly states that "the historian . . . cannot justifiably deny the empty tomb" because normally applied historical criteria indicate that, "the evidence is firm and plausible enough to necessitate the conclusion that the tomb was indeed found empty."[28]

These eight reasons indicate why virtually all recent scholars conclude that the disciples thought that they had seen the risen Jesus. Paul's eyewitness testimony, the early date of the pre-Pauline creed(s) in 1 Corinthians 15:3ff., scrutinizing his Gospel message at least twice before the chief apostles who were also witnesses, and Paul's knowledge of their eyewitness teaching on the resurrection appearances produces a simply astounding, interconnected line of evidence nearly unheard of in ancient documents. Howard Clark Kee surprisingly remarks that Paul's research "can be critically examined and compared with other testimony from eyewitnesses of Jesus, just as one would evaluate evidence in a modern court or academic setting."[29]

Further, four additional reasons include the conversion of James from unbelief after witnessing an appearance from his brother Jesus, other early creedal texts in Acts and elsewhere, the disciples' transformation, and the possibility of the empty tomb. It is clear that the disciples were thoroughly convinced that Jesus was raised from the dead and that they had seen him. Still other factors could be mentioned, but these are sufficient for our purposes.[30]

No other thesis viably opposes the conclusion that the disciples at least thought that Jesus was raised from the dead. This was what Fuller termed "one of the indisputable facts of history." The disciples thought that they had witnessed Jesus' appearances, which, however they are explained, "is a fact upon which both believer and unbeliever may agree."[31] Fuller adds that "[e]ven the most skeptical historian" must do one more thing: "postulate some other event" that is not the disciples' faith, but the reason for their faith, in order to account for their experiences. Of course, both natural and supernatural options have been proposed.[32]

For the remainder of this article, we will survey the major categorical options that propose explanations to account for the disciples' belief that they had actually seen the risen Jesus. Although we will not decide here on a specific cause, it is my contention that even narrowing the options can be of great assistance in addressing the single most crucial aspect of these historical issues.

Accounting for the Disciples' Experiences

Each of the eight reasons above argues clearly for the belief that Jesus was seen alive after his crucifixion. The widespread view of contemporary scholars is that a visual claim was being made, either as a perceived revelation or as some type of presence. The disciples proclaimed that they had seen appearances of Jesus. This is what Paul clearly attested. The pre-Pauline creed lists Peter, James, and the other apostles as recipients. Peter, James, and John were all present when Paul's Gospel was affirmed. Paul knew of their preaching on Jesus' appearances. Most scholars agree that Jesus' tomb was empty. As a result, these disciples were transformed.

Recent scholars agree. Helmut Koester points out that, "We are on much firmer ground with respect to the appearances of the risen Jesus and their effect." Jesus' appearances "cannot very well be questioned."[33] Bart Ehrman declares: "we can say with complete certainty that some of his disciples at some later time insisted that . . . he soon appeared to them, convincing them that he had been raised from the dead."[34] Ehrman adds: "Historians, of course, have no difficulty whatsoever speaking about the belief in Jesus' resurrection, since this is a matter of public record."[35] Holtz thinks that the disciples' "experience of resurrection . . . is in fact an undeniable historical event."[36] Ludemann reminds us that the appearance language employed by Paul is that of sight: "active sensual perception. . . . Paul is claiming a visual side to the appearance . . . ."[37] More specifically, Paul thinks that Jesus appeared in his "transformed spiritual resurrection corporeality."[38]

It seems clear that the disciples were utterly persuaded that the risen Jesus had appeared to them. The data are strong enough that this is granted by virtually all critical scholars. Can we get any closer to the nature of the experience that convinced the disciples? We will mention three avenues, each of which presents its own problems.

Those who deny (or question) whether the disciples actually saw Jesus in some sense would seemingly sever the connection between what the disciples thought, and what really happened. They generally move in either of two directions, by directly or indirectly positing their solution.

(1) The more popular of the two skeptical approaches, reaching its heyday in nineteenth century thought, posed a naturalistic theory to account for the data. Such a move basically accepted the strongest historical facts, while veering off in a natural direction instead of affirming the resurrection.[39]

However, in spite of a minority resurgence at present,[40] this approach has proven to be the most difficult. In fact, the vast majority of critical scholars reject this option. They are often well aware that the weight of the known historical facts opposes each of the proposals, and comparatively few attempt it. Scholars generally concede that there are multiple historical problems with each of the options.

For instance, Raymond Brown refers to these theses as "gratuitous charges."[41] James D.G. Dunn charges that these "alternative interpretations of the data fail to provide a more satisfactory explanation."[42] Stephen Davis agrees: "All of the alternative hypotheses with which I am familiar are historically weak; some are so weak that they collapse of their own weight once spelled out. . . . the alternative theories that have been proposed are not only weaker but far weaker at explaining the available historical evidence. . . ."[43] John A.T. Robinson admits that, "It is indeed very difficult to dismiss [Jesus' appearances] and still find a credible explanation."[44]

(2) Another option[45] is the agnostic plea that we do not (or cannot) really know what happened. The disciples indeed were sincere in their belief that they saw Jesus, but we cannot determine the cause.

This position sometimes seems to reject even the possibility of actual appearances, rather than following the data to its conclusion. The approach is difficult to maintain, since its question mark could be answered by the many factual considerations. Perhaps we have plenty of evidence already to decide the case, especially since we used only those minimal data that virtually all critical scholars accept, including agnostics. So critics must not reject, or pull up short of, the results that are indicated by their own research, which may clearly indicate that more than an undefined "something" occurred to Jesus' disciples.

Recognized historical particulars must be accounted for in a viable manner. For example, perhaps the eight areas mentioned above could settle the matter of the cause of the disciples' experiences. But simply to label these data as insufficient does not explain them--they may be precisely what is capable of solving the historical issue. With Fuller, many scholars counter that we are capable of positing a cause for the disciples' faith beyond the faith itself.[46]

(3) In my study mentioned at the outset of this essay, by far the most popular option at present is that Jesus was actually raised in some form, either as an objective vision or in a transformed body.[47] The former view was more popular a few decades ago, while the latter appears clearly to be the majority view at present . Reasons such as those listed here are most frequently mentioned for establishing this position, each of which points to a visual event that changed the disciples' lives, completely convincing them that they had seen the risen Jesus.

Besides the rejoinders posed by the naturalistic hypotheses, various a priori objections have been proposed. While seldom addressed specifically to the resurrection, these philosophical misgivings are aimed at miracles in general. For example, naturalists or more deistic thinkers object that miraculous events do not occur. Or, these reservations might concern background information (as with Bayes Theorem), or issues regarding the nature of the evidence. While favored by some philosophers, these responses are also opposed by many.[48]

Conclusion

I have argued that at the center of the historical issue regarding the resurrection appearances is that Jesus' disciples were totally convinced that they had seen the risen Jesus. Many strong reasons support the historicity of these beliefs. Virtually all critical scholars agree that these the disciples' convictions are thoroughly historical.

Do the disciples' beliefs that they had experienced resurrection appearances provide any clues as to what caused these convictions? We have outlined three chief options. It is not our purpose here to choose between these general paths that purport to account for the cause of the disciples' experiences.

One option might potentially show itself to be superior. For example, since many researchers accept the maxim that a viable natural hypothesis is to be accepted before a supernatural one, postulating and checking alternative scenarios by the known data will probably continue. This process makes sense. On the other hand, if alternative theses continually fail amid dissatisfaction with agnostic reluctance, the reasons favoring the disciples' experiences might indicate that the most likely scenario is that the disciples actually did see the risen Jesus.

In general, the more thoroughly one option fails, the more likely the others become. And the more strongly an option is established, the more the others diminish. Even without a final solution here, however, there is still value in honing our instruments and narrowing our options.

Endnotes

[1] Fuller, The Foundations of New Testament Christology (New York: Scribner's, 1965), 142.

[2] E.P. Sanders, The Historical Figure of Jesus (London: Penguin, 1993), 11, 13.

[3] Michael Martin, The Case Against Christianity (Philadelphia: Temple University, 1991), 81.

[4] Reginald Fuller, The Formation of the Resurrection Narratives (New York: Macmillan, 1980), 10.

[5] Of the vast number of scholars who agree, some examples include John Kloppenborg, "An Analysis of the Pre-Pauline Formula in 1 Cor 15:3b-5 in Light of Some Recent Literature," Catholic Biblical Quarterly, Vol. 40 (1978), especially 351, 360; Jerome Murphy-O'Connor, "Tradition and Redaction in 1 Cor 15:3-7," Catholic Biblical Quarterly, Vol. 43 (1981), 582-589; John Meier, A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus (New York: Doubleday, 2001), Vol. 2:139; Sanders, The Historical Figure of Jesus, 277; Pinchas Lapide, The Resurrection of Jesus: A Jewish Perspective (Minneapolis: Augsberg, 1983), 97-99.

[6] Several studies on the meaning of historesai in Gal. 1:18 have reached similar conclusions. See William Farmer, "Peter and Paul, and the Tradition Concerning `The Lord's Supper' in I Cor. 11:23-25," Criswell Theological Review, Vol. 2 (1987), 122-130, in particular, and 135-138 for an apostolic, Petrine source for the pre-Pauline tradition. Also helpful is an older but still authoritative study by G.D. Kilpatrick, "Galatians 1:18 historesai Kephan" in New Testament Essays: Studies in Memory of Thomas Walter Manson, A.J.B. Higgins, editor (Manchester: Manchester University, 1959), 144-149. Paul Barnett reports that this same term appears in Herodotus, Polybius, and Plutarch, for whom it meant to inquire (41). Similar ideas are contained in J. Dore, "La Resurrection de Jesus: A L'Epreuve du Discours Theologique," Recherches de Science Religieuse, Vol. 65 (1977), 291, endnote 11.

[7] Ulrich Wilckens, Resurrection: Biblical Testimony to the Resurrection: An Historical Examination and Explanation (Edinburgh: St. Andrew, 1977), 2.
[8] Joachim Jeremias, "Easter: The Earliest Tradition and the Earliest Interpretation," New Testament Theology, trans. John Bowden (N.Y.: Scribner's, 1971), 306.

[9] Walter Kaspar, Jesus the Christ, new ed., trans. V. Green (Mahweh: Paulist, 1976), 125.

[10] Gerd Ludemann, The Resurrection of Jesus, trans. John Bowden (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1994), 38 (Ludemann’s emphasis).

[11] Michael Goulder, "The Baseless Fabric of a Vision," in Gavin D’Costa, editor, Resurrection Reconsidered (Oxford: Oneworld, 1996), 48.
[12] Thomas Sheehan, The First Coming: How the Kingdom of God became Christianity (New York: Random House, 1986), 118; cf. 110-111.

[13] For instances, see A.J.M. Wedderburn, Beyond Resurrection (Peabody: Hendrickson, 1999), 274, note 265; Robert Funk, Roy W. Hoover, and the Jesus Seminar, The Five Gospels (New York: Macmillan, 1993), 24; Jack Kent, The Psychological Origins of the Resurrection Myth (London: Open Gate, 1999), 16-17; G.A. Wells, Did Jesus Exist? (London: Pemberton, 1986), 30.

[14] Besides those listed above, a few of the many others include: Meier, A Marginal Jew, 2:139; Fuller, The Formation of the Resurrection Narratives, 10, 14, 48; Raymond Brown, The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus (N.Y.: Paulist, 1973), 81; Francis X. Durrwell, La Resurrection de Jesus: Mystere de Salut, (Paris: Les edtions du Cerf, 1976), 22; Peter Stuhlmacher, Jesus of Nazareth--Christ of Faith, trans. Siegfried S. Shatzmann (Peabody: Hendrickson, 1993), 8; C.E.B. Cranfield, "The Resurrection of Jesus Christ," Expository Times, Vol. 101 (1990), 169; James D.G. Dunn, The Evidence for Jesus (Louisville: Westminster, 1985), 70; Leander E. Keck, Who is Jesus? History in Perfect Tense (Columbia: University of South Carolina, 2000), 139; Helmut Merklein, "Die Auferweckung Jesu und die Anfange der Christologie (Messias bzw. Sohn Gottes und Menschensohn)," Zeitschrift fur die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der alteren Kirche, Vol. 72 (1981), reprint, 2.

[15] Martin Hengel, The Atonement: The Origins of the Doctrine in the New Testament, trans. John Bowden (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981), 38.

[16] Meier, A Marginal Jew, 2:68-71.

[17] Fuller, The Formation of the Resurrection Narratives, 37.

[18] Of the many examples, see Ludemann, The Resurrection of Jesus, 109; Helmut Koester, Introduction to the New Testament (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982), Vol. 2:84; Robert Funk, Honest to Jesus (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1996), 33; Wedderburn, 116; John Shelby Spong, The Easter Moment (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1987), 68; Peter Stuhlmacher, "The Resurrection of Jesus and the Resurrection of the Dead," trans. Jonathan M. Whitlock, Ex Auditu, Vol. 9 (1993), 49; E.P. Sanders, "But Did it Happen?" The Spectator, Vol. 276 (1996), 17.

[19] The most popular candidates for these condensed confessional segments are located within the sermon material in Acts 1:21-22; 2:22-36; 3:13-16; 4:8-10; 5:29-32; 10:39-43; 13:28-31; 17:1-3; 17:30-31.

[20] For some examples, see Gerd Ludemann, Early Christianity According to the Traditions in Acts: A Commentary, trans. John Bowden (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989), especially 47-49, 112-115; Hengel, 34; Kloppenborg, 361; John Alsup, The Post-Resurrection Appearance Stories of the Gospel Tradition: A History-of-Tradiitons Analysis with Text-Synopsis, Calwer Theologische Monographien 5 (Stuttgart: Calwer Verlag, 1975), 64-65, 81-85; Merklein, 2; Raymond E. Brown, An Introduction to New Testament Christology (Mahweh: Paulist, 1994), 112-113, 164; Durrwell, 22; Ben F. Meyer, The Aims of Jesus (London: SCM, 1979), 61, 64, 66; Fuller, The Formation of the Resurrection Narratives, 44-45; Pheme Perkins, Resurrection: New Testament Witness and Contemporary Reflection (Garden City: Doubleday, 1984), 90, 228-231; Max Wilcox, The Semitisms of Acts (Oxford: Clarendon, 1965), esp. 79-80, 164-165; Luke Timothy Johnson, Living Jesus: Learning the Heart of the Gospel (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1999), 34; C.H. Dodd, The Apostolic Preaching and its Developments (Grand Rapids: Baker, reprint, 1980), 17-31.
[21] For examples, mentions of Jesus' appearances are found in Acts 2:31-32, 3:15, 10:39-41; 13:29-37.

[22] Gerald O’Collins, Interpreting Jesus (London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1983), 109-110.

[23] John Drane, Introducing the New Testament (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1986), 99.

[24] For critical agreement in various elements here, see Willi Marxsen, Jesus and Easter (Nashville: Abingdon, 1990), 66; J. Dore, "Croire en la Resurrection de Jesus-Christ," etudes, Vol. 356 (1982), 536-537; Funk, Honest to Jesus, especially 270; Wedderburn, 46-47; Hengel, 65; J.K. Elliott, "The First Easter," History Today, Vol. 29 (1979), 210, 215, 218; Wolfhart Pannenberg, Jesus--God and Man, second ed., trans. Lewis L. Wilkins and Duane A. Priebe (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1977), 96; Michael Grant, Saint Peter: A Biography (N.Y.: Scribner, 1994), pp. 89, 96; Sanders, 11, 276-280; Hugh Jackson, "The Resurrection Belief of the Earliest Church: A Response to the Failure of Prophecy," The Journal of Religion, Vol. 55 (1975), 419-422; Elaine Pagels, The Gnostic Gospels (NY: Random House, 1979), 8.

[25] This data is summarized in my forthcoming article, "The Empty Tomb of Jesus: Recent Critical Arguments."

[26] Similar reports are also found in Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho 108 and Tertullian, On Spectacles 30.

[27] Dunn, 68.

[28] Michael Grant, Jesus: An Historian’s Review of the Gospels (N.Y.: Collier, 1992), 176.

[29] Howard Clark Kee, What Can We Know about Jesus? (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1990), 1-2.

[30] For details on all of these reasons, as well as other pertinent information, see Gary R. Habermas, The Risen Jesus and Future Hope (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), Chapter 1.

[31] Fuller, The Foundations of New Testament Christology, 142.

[32] Fuller, The Formation of the Resurrection Narratives, 2, 169, respectively; cf. 181.

[33] Koester, 2:84.

[34] Bart Ehrman, Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium (New York: Oxford University, 1999), 230.

[35] Ehrman, 231.

[36] My translation of the German text in Traugott Holtz, "Kenntnis von Jesus und Kenntnis Jesu: Eine Skizze zum Verhaltnis zwischen historisch-philologischer Erkenntnis und historisch-theologischem Verstandnis," Theologische Literaturzeitung, Vol. 104 (1979), 10.

[37] Ludemann, The Resurrection of Jesus, 50; cf. 37.

[38] Gerd Ludemann, What Really Happened to Jesus: A Historical Approach to the Resurrection, with Alf Özen, trans. John Bowden (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1995), 103.

[39] For details, see Gary R. Habermas, "The Late Twentieth-Century Resurgence of Naturalistic Responses to Jesus' Resurrection," Trinity Journal, new series, Vol. 22 (2001), 179-196.

[40] Represented by the works of Ludemann, Goulder, and Kent above.

[41] Brown, An Introduction to New Testament Christology, 163; cf. 163-167.

[42] Dunn, 76. Cf. N.T. Wright, "Christian Origins and the Resurrection of Jesus: The Resurrection of Jesus as a Historical Problem," Sewanee Theological Review, Vol. 41 (1998), 118-122.

[43] Stephen T. Davis, "Is Belief in the Resurrection Rational?" Philo, Vol. 2 (1999), 57-58.

[44] John A.T. Robinson, Can We Trust the New Testament? (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977), 124.

[45] Represented by the works of Marxsen and Wedderburn above.

[46] Fuller, The Formation of the Resurrection Narratives, 2, 169, 181.

[47] The first is favored by Jeremias and the second by Wright above.

[48] For examples of each, see Rodney D. Holder, "Hume on Miracles: Bayesian Interpretation, Multiple Testimony, and the Existence of God," British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Volume 49 (1998), especially 60-62; George N. Schlesinger, "Miracles and Probabilities," Nous, Volume 21 (1987), especially 219, 230-232; John Earman, "Bayes, Hume, and Miracles," Faith and Philosophy, Volume 10 (1993), especially 293, 305-306; Richard Otte, "Schlesinger and Miracles," Faith and Philosophy, Volume 10 (1993), especially 93, 97; David Owen, "Hume Versus Price on Miracles and Prior Probabilities," Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 37 (1987), 187-202.


Originally published in Dialog: A Journal of Theology, Vol. 45; No. 3 (Fall, 2006), pp. 288-297; published by Blackwell Publishing, UK.

Source
Tweet
Share on Tumblr
Posted by J.Sanidopoulos at 12:07 PM No comments: Links to this post
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: Apologetics, Pascha and the Pentecostarion
Reactions: 
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Related Posts with Thumbnails